Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 31
richms
29104 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10222

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031171 3-Feb-2023 10:05
Send private message

If you don't like it, cancel it and do without netflix for a month so they get the message that their offering is lousy. Its not like you are on a term contract and the only way they will respond is with people leaving.





Richard rich.ms



networkn
Networkn
32871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15469

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031180 3-Feb-2023 10:33
Send private message

richms:

 

If you don't like it, cancel it and do without netflix for a month so they get the message that their offering is lousy. Its not like you are on a term contract and the only way they will respond is with people leaving.

 

 

They will have budgeted for it, and I suspect for longer than most people will be able to hold out and put up with the inconvenience of not paying for a second household for $4-5 dollars. 

 

I'll be pretty surprised if there is a significant drop in revenue long term as a result of only this change.

 

 


hsvhel
1273 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 596

ID Verified

  #3031218 3-Feb-2023 11:27
Send private message

Their share movement suggests people are largely un-phased by the announcement.

 

Unless that is yet to hit when they open

 

 





Referral Link Quic

 

Free Setup use R502152EQH6OK on check out

 

 




Scott3
4177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2990

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031257 3-Feb-2023 13:02
Send private message

A 2017 tweet from Netflix has aged poorly.

 

The original Netflix tweet posted in 2017.


Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #3031277 3-Feb-2023 13:48
Send private message

We're already paying for a limited number of simultaneous streams. 1 stream for Basic plan, 2 for Standard, 4 for Premium. So I really don't understand why this is even necessary. If people are paying for 2 or 4 streams, let them use them how they want.

 

I bet a lot of people are paying for the Premium plan simply so they can share the password, and when that ability goes away they'll downgrade. And a huge number of people who are using someone else's password won't think it's worth paying a full membership themselves. I just don't see this resulting in more revenue for Netflix.

 

I pay for Premium not for extra streams, but for 4K/HDR, and honestly most of the time I question whether it's worth it when (aside from a few rare exceptions) they only provide 4K/HDR for Netflix Originals. Why are modern movies, that are shot and mastered in 4K HDR, only available to stream in 1080p? Most other streaming services are just as bad, their services are 4K/HDR capable but they don't provide the films in that format.

 

It will also be interesting to see what will happen with those using DNS providers or VPNs who frequently switch regions.


networkn
Networkn
32871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15469

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031279 3-Feb-2023 13:55
Send private message

Paul1977:

 

I bet a lot of people are paying for the Premium plan simply so they can share the password, and when that ability goes away they'll downgrade. And a huge number of people who are using someone else's password won't think it's worth paying a full membership themselves. I just don't see this resulting in more revenue for Netflix.

 

 

It may not increase revenue per se, but it probably will increase profitability. If they drop 100,000 freeloading users then the back end and support requirements, and therefore people and resource use will go down.

 

I don't see there being many if any downsides for Netflix on this.

 

I could be proven wrong, a year from now they could cease to exist, but I doubt it, and I doubt it would be soley this responsible.

 

For all the rage I see online about this, I still maintain that at the end of the day, people value their time more than $5 a month for trying to work around this, and Netflix is unparalled entertainment value overall for most people.

 

 


 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #3031286 3-Feb-2023 14:14
Send private message

networkn:

 

It may not increase revenue per se, but it probably will increase profitability. If they drop 100,000 freeloading users then the back end and support requirements, and therefore people and resource use will go down.

 

I don't see there being many if any downsides for Netflix on this.

 

I could be proven wrong, a year from now they could cease to exist, but I doubt it, and I doubt it would be soley this responsible.

 

For all the rage I see online about this, I still maintain that at the end of the day, people value their time more than $5 a month for trying to work around this, and Netflix is unparalled entertainment value overall for most people.

 

 

Don't forget the additional backend requirements to monitor and enforce their new policy.

 

The section I bolded above used to be true, but not so much these days. With the rise of other services, Netflix loses more and more back catalog content; and there's more and more new content that they don't get because other services secure the rights. It's about value for money, and that is getting worse and worse  - Netflix used to be 80% of what I'd watch, now it's closer to 20%. Anything they do to make their services value for money worse will ultimately hurt them.

 

Gone are they days when Netflix could rely on being the only player in town.


ajw

ajw
1968 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 369


  #3031411 3-Feb-2023 17:03
Send private message

networkn:

 

richms:

 

If you don't like it, cancel it and do without netflix for a month so they get the message that their offering is lousy. Its not like you are on a term contract and the only way they will respond is with people leaving.

 

 

They will have budgeted for it, and I suspect for longer than most people will be able to hold out and put up with the inconvenience of not paying for a second household for $4-5 dollars. 

 

I'll be pretty surprised if there is a significant drop in revenue long term as a result of only this change.

 

 

 

 

If they manage to lose two to three million customers worldwide I guarantee there would be a rethink.


scuwp
3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #3031418 3-Feb-2023 17:34
Send private message

ajw:

 

If they manage to lose two to three million customers worldwide I guarantee there would be a rethink.

 

 

On global customer stats I can find online in a hurry, even at 3 mil that's an inconsequential 0.01% of their customers.  They won't bat an eyelid.  Also, it's not about subscribers, it about profitability.   

 

Also that won't happen.  It may be topical now because a vocal few are reacting on social media, creating some inflated sense of a global outrage that simply doesn't exist.   The majority of customers I would say will just accept the changes as inevitable and get on with worrying about life's bigger problems.  Once the initial outrage settles down, my bet is that they will probably have more subscribers.  





Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #3031425 3-Feb-2023 18:00
Send private message

scuwp:
On global customer stats I can find online in a hurry, even at 3 mil that's an inconsequential 0.01% of their customers.

Unless Netflix has 30 billion subscribers, your maths is a little off.

Q3 2022 they had 223 million subscribers, so 3 million would be about 1.35%.

networkn
Networkn
32871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15469

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031427 3-Feb-2023 18:04
Send private message

Paul1977:
scuwp:
On global customer stats I can find online in a hurry, even at 3 mil that's an inconsequential 0.01% of their customers.

Unless Netflix has 30 billion subscribers, your maths is a little off.

Q3 2022 they had 223 million subscribers, so 3 million would be about 1.35%.


Well that changes everything! They should file for chapter 11 immediately!

 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.
Handle9
11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031432 3-Feb-2023 18:21
Send private message

The sneering in this thread is pretty gross.

 

If you think Netflix new policy is fine and still offers the value you want, good for you. If others are in a different position that's their value judgement.

 

This isn't a change in policy based on any moral imperative, it's a change to bolster their collapsing stock price and stagnant growth rate. There's no moral aspect to this on either side, Netflix implicitly encouraged password sharing for years and now they want to monetise those customers. That's their business and if customers now find it doesn't offer value they should leave.

 

Expecting customers to quietly accept a significant reduction in value is dumb, why shouldn't customers complain if the value offered is reduced?


Handle9
11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031433 3-Feb-2023 18:26
Send private message

scuwp:

 

On global customer stats I can find online in a hurry, even at 3 mil that's an inconsequential 0.01% of their customers.  They won't bat an eyelid. 

 

 

If they lose 3 million customers the markets will punish them in a significant way. They will certainly bat an eyelid and have to take action.


ajw

ajw
1968 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 369


  #3031436 3-Feb-2023 18:36
Send private message

@Handle9

 

I'm surprised that they are going ahead with this as some markets are heading into recession.

 

 


Handle9
11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3031443 3-Feb-2023 18:48
Send private message

ajw:

 

Handle9

 

I'm surprised that they are going ahead with this as some markets are heading into recession.

 

 

I'm not surprised really. A lot of the big tech businesses are moving from high growth with extremely high PER to being lower growth businesses which have to focus on efficiency. Netflix is pretty close to saturation, it's very difficult for them get more people viewing the content.

 

This, like advertising supported packages, is a way to squeeze more juice out of the lemon.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 31
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.