|
|
|
If you can't laugh at yourself then you probably shouldn't laugh at others.
Handsomedan:
I think it's criminal that visitors are forced to pay for parking - especially at Starship of all places!
I was shocked when we visited our friends' newborn baby who had open heart surgery a few years back at how much it cost us. I dare say it's a lot more now.
If you're visiting family it shouldn't cost you anything.
When my illness flares I have to go to the hospital for treatment and observation depending what is happening I can be there all day and sometimes several times a week. I used to drive myself before I gave up driving and parking cost and arm and a leg. My wife will take me now and have to park all day
and it costs a lot and if she cannot one of my sons or friends will take and again I will pay a fortune for parking. I wont go by taxis due to the health risks. Patients and visitors should not be a revenue stream.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
I am fortunate enough that I can afford it, but I think think it's outrageous. $7.50 for an hour, my wife paid $40 the first time he was admitted. I can't really understand having Wilsons run it, a company who's ethics and charging schemes leave a huge amount to be desired.
I can't remember if this has been mentioned, but I think one of my team mentioned the Auckland Hospital carpark is owned by ACC.
I don't think anyone chooses to spend time in a hospital, and we shouldn't be punished for going there. Public transport is typically not an option if you are taking someone for an appointment.
Hospital parking charges feel outrageous, and IMHO should probably be on a cost-recovery basis (including capital cost). Maybe $1 per hour for the first 4 hours and then 50c/hour after that? You'd have to have a method of discouraging workers in the area using it though.
“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams
Many places (at least overseas) validate the parking charges of clients or visitors with an appointment. I don't see why hospitals could not do the same thing. (Expensive) paid parking may be necessary due to high demand and limited space, but there is no good reason a system could not be worked out for patients and visitors of certain categories of patients.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:I rather naively thought that's what would happen for patients...
Many places (at least overseas) validate the parking charges of clients or visitors with an appointment. I don't see why hospitals could not do the same thing. (Expensive) paid parking may be necessary due to high demand and limited space, but there is no good reason a system could not be worked out for patients and visitors of certain categories of patients.
Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...
Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale
*Gladly accepting donations...
I would rather a hospital spend (their insufficient) money on providing medical care than parking.
I had a cycling accident a long while back, whilst I still lived in the UK. Over the handlebars downhill on a mountain bike. Buckled the front wheel, broke helmet and so on.
Woke up the next day with a haematoma the size of a grapefruit on my right thigh. Agony - could barely hobble. Decided I had better get checked at A&E so off I went. Arrived at A&E and found all the carparking spaces near the doors were empty but marked "Doctors Only"...! Ended up having to hobble quite a way AND pay for the parking per hour whilst I was a patient in A&E! 🤬

blackjack17:
I would rather a hospital spend (their insufficient) money on providing medical care than parking.
Providing parking is a capital cost already paid for when the hospital was built. There is no significant cost to providing it thereafter apart from occasionally re-lining the parking spaces.

Geektastic:
blackjack17:
I would rather a hospital spend (their insufficient) money on providing medical care than parking.
Providing parking is a capital cost already paid for when the hospital was built. There is no significant cost to providing it thereafter apart from occasionally re-lining the parking spaces.
Great, 100% margin
So my little fella is home with us again. After a series of scary and intrusive tests they couldn't find a cause of his symptoms, but thankfully he has been symptom-free since he woke yesterday morning.
We have some exceptional medical and medical support people in our health care system, and some of those people really went above and beyond to help him feel as comfortable as it was possible to be all things considered. As a parent, I can't tell you grateful for that I am.
Some of the worst and scariest things have been ruled out, which has been a huge relief, even if they were pretty unlikely.
Right now I am just stupidly happy he is home with us and to boot, is his usual cheerful and happy self and with a very healthy appetite. It's done wonders for my state of mind.
I really hope we can have a few uneventful weeks or months!
Handle9: It's good to hear he's home. Hopefully this was just a passing episode and you can focus on arguing important matters like why the Crusaders shouldn't have anyone in the All Blacks 😉.
If you took the Crusaders out of the AB's then there would only be 4 players left to play Australia ;) That's probably still enough to keep the Bledisloe though :-)
Geektastic:
blackjack17:
I would rather a hospital spend (their insufficient) money on providing medical care than parking.
Providing parking is a capital cost already paid for when the hospital was built. There is no significant cost to providing it thereafter apart from occasionally re-lining the parking spaces.
Unfortunately, to generate cashflow, many hospitals in the main centres have contracted the operation of their carparks to commercial operators. Hospital carparks are then just commercial carparks which happen to be situated near a hospital.

|
|
|