Aaroona:

nitrotech: Best advise I've been given is to remember that it's a court of law not a court of justice - there is very little chance of winning in court - having been through the process it's just not worth the time or energy - save yourself the hassle invest your time into other pursuits.

The problem is here in this case, is it seems the "Law" is not clear.

Their camera started taking pictures of my vehicle before and after I was exiting the intersection. That is approx. 98 meters from where the last photo is taken.

First picture:



Second picture, showing I waited for the bus and then was pulling in behind it - if I was going to use the bus lane, why would I swing out so wide?




Third picture, vehicle in the left lane, driving over a bus stop (not stationary), but NOT in the bus lane, evident by the car next to mine which is over the writing "BUS LANE"





am I incorrect in what I'm thinking?

EDIT: 

Also in the last picture, a quick google map to calcualate distance - even if I started to move before the lane started to split; that's still less than 40 meters, account only for the "BUS LANE"

Am I correct in saying their evidence is alleging I used the bus lane from Picture 1 all the way to picture 3? in which case, that's definitely incorrect.