Again, you might be law abiding but it doesn't mean it's a sensible thing to drive as an inexperienced driver against one's normal circadian rhythm and carrying a group of young and (likely) immature males late in the morning. No one is disputing that as a matter of law people can do whatever the law allows them to -- all that I am calling out is that, heavens forbid, perhaps the adults involved can (for example) come in and offer a certain degree of realism to their own kids and encourage them to wrap things up at 1am instead of 4? This would be far more constructive than everyone feigning surprise when a few teens die after the driver wraps their car around a tree through either speeding or just misjudging the conditions/fatigue?
Oh and you know what is funny? It is considered an aggravating factor that someone was driving late in the morning and likely fatigued should the terrible crash happen and someone gets seriously injured or killed. Prosecutors, once the elements of the charges are proven, are not required to prove aggravating factors in sentencing beyond reasonable doubt and judges are entitled to draw reasonable inferences. But you being the expert about the courts, you'd already know this, right?



