Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | ... | 140
nzkc
1647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1049


  #2427258 26-Feb-2020 10:09
Send private message quote this post

tehgerbil:

 

I wonder if this sets a nasty precedent?

 

 

Dont know about nasty....certainly interesting. A couple more like this could have huge implications with the extreme end being our motorways become unrestricted autobahns.

 

Personally; I'd be trying to use this as a case law if I was clocked a bit over the limit on a motorway with little/no traffic around.  If you're going to lose your license anyway, why wouldnt you?

 

For the record: I don't have any points on my license, but have had a couple of camera tickets of just over the limit in the last 10 years.




floydbloke
3703 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4688

ID Verified

  #2427269 26-Feb-2020 10:25
Send private message quote this post

tehgerbil:

 

I wonder if this sets a nasty precedent? Poor lighting conditions at twilight, relatively new driver (held full less than a year) and was driving at 68km/h over the speed limit. 
Road engineers do not set speed limits for their own amusement, this utterly makes a mockery of the law.

I'm sure police everywhere are sighing heavily into their coffee over the paper and wondering when they hit their first speeder who'll claim they should get away scott-free because this guy did. 

This is not ok. 

 

 

Probably worth noting that he still had to pay the $400 fine and $130 court fees, so not entirely scot-free, just didn't get a dangerous-driving conviction.  Agree though, the precedent could be a concern.

 

 





The Institute of Unfinished Research has concluded that 6 out of 10 people


afe66
3181 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1679

Lifetime subscriber

  #2427288 26-Feb-2020 10:57
Send private message quote this post

I would have kept my head down after that case.

Certainly not appear on stuff website looking proud in front of my car.

While he hasnt been convicted of dangerous driving but now his name will appear in any google search and might be an issue in his future...



Handsomedan
8046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7872

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2427292 26-Feb-2020 11:05
Send private message quote this post

afe66: I would have kept my head down after that case.

Certainly not appear on stuff website looking proud in front of my car.

While he hasnt been convicted of dangerous driving but now his name will appear in any google search and might be an issue in his future...

 

In fairness, he's been quite contrite around the "speeding is bad" message...





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...


jarledb

Webhead
3336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2000

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427446 26-Feb-2020 13:13
Send private message quote this post

floydbloke:

 

Probably worth noting that he still had to pay the $400 fine and $130 court fees, so not entirely scot-free, just didn't get a dangerous-driving conviction.  Agree though, the precedent could be a concern.

 

 

That's not a serious speeding ticket. He would have lost his license and gotten a fine of $1,800 NZD in Norway for that kind of driving. In fact if you go more than 40 kmh over the speed limit (on 90 or higher) that's what you get.

 

I don't get why the penalty for driving over the speed limit is so low here. Given the death toll on NZ roads you would think those fines would be higher to keep people from being stupid.





Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


Jase2985
13830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6296

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427449 26-Feb-2020 13:22
Send private message quote this post

NzBeagle:

 

tehgerbil:

 

Road engineers do not set speed limits for their own amusement ...

 

Are you sure? I do often wonder....

 

The 80kph Northwestern in Auckland for example

 

 

which part? the one with the variable speed signs?


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
Geektastic
18033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8497

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427472 26-Feb-2020 13:45
Send private message quote this post

jarledb:

 

floydbloke:

 

Probably worth noting that he still had to pay the $400 fine and $130 court fees, so not entirely scot-free, just didn't get a dangerous-driving conviction.  Agree though, the precedent could be a concern.

 

 

That's not a serious speeding ticket. He would have lost his license and gotten a fine of $1,800 NZD in Norway for that kind of driving. In fact if you go more than 40 kmh over the speed limit (on 90 or higher) that's what you get.

 

I don't get why the penalty for driving over the speed limit is so low here. Given the death toll on NZ roads you would think those fines would be higher to keep people from being stupid.

 

 

 

 

The fine for jumping a red light is only $200 or so I think - and that most assuredly could kill people.

 

I agree that the fines should be increased by at least a factor of 10 and for more serious offences, your vehicle crushed if you do not pay in 14 days. Also we should have 100 times the number of cameras, and you should get points for camera offences too.

 

 

 

I have said before that part of the problem is caused by not having compulsory insurance: the effect on your premiums is so significant if you get done for speeding or drink driving that it acts as a massive deterrent aside from the issue of judicial sanction.






Batman
Mad Scientist
30124 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6312

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427515 26-Feb-2020 14:09
Send private message quote this post

jarledb:

 

floydbloke:

 

Probably worth noting that he still had to pay the $400 fine and $130 court fees, so not entirely scot-free, just didn't get a dangerous-driving conviction.  Agree though, the precedent could be a concern.

 

 

That's not a serious speeding ticket. He would have lost his license and gotten a fine of $1,800 NZD in Norway for that kind of driving. In fact if you go more than 40 kmh over the speed limit (on 90 or higher) that's what you get.

 

I don't get why the penalty for driving over the speed limit is so low here. Given the death toll on NZ roads you would think those fines would be higher to keep people from being stupid.

 

 

the penalty for driving 51k above speed limit here is loss of licence for ?28 days iirc


trig42
5925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2143

ID Verified

  #2427540 26-Feb-2020 14:48
Send private message quote this post

Batman:

 

the penalty for driving 51k above speed limit here is loss of licence for ?28 days iirc

 

 

It's 40+k's over the limit, and this fellow got a 28 day suspension (he was 68k over). 

 

Speeding fines (actually, all driving infringements) are too lenient here. Compare it to Australia (QLD anyway), he would have had a $1245 fine, 6 months suspension and 8 Demerits (of a possible 10). Another thing, in Aus, do something again within 12 months, and the demerits are doubled. 

 

Interestingly, in QLD (maybe others) if you get a camera speeding fine in a work vehicle, the fine is 5x the standard unless the business nominates you (so that you also cop the demerits). Why don't we copy their system?


Dairyxox
1595 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 455


  #2427571 26-Feb-2020 15:40
Send private message quote this post

 

Heard continuous revving/screeching outside my place one night.


Geektastic
18033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8497

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427622 26-Feb-2020 17:15
Send private message quote this post

Dairyxox:

 

 

Heard continuous revving/screeching outside my place one night.

 

 

 

 

That did not sound very well!






 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
huckster
910 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 486

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2427682 26-Feb-2020 18:41
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

Dairyxox:

 

 

 

Heard continuous revving/screeching outside my place one night.

 

 

 

 

That did not sound very well!

 

 

Good. Hope it was expensive.


geoffwnz
1789 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1672

ID Verified
Subscriber

  #2428074 27-Feb-2020 10:08
Send private message quote this post

huckster:

 

Geektastic:

 

That did not sound very well!

 

 

Good. Hope it was expensive.

 

 

Looked like just tyres down to the steel belts making that noise unfortunately.

 

But I've never understood the desire to destroy a set of tyres in a few minutes by turning them into smoke.  And I race cars.  I'd rather have them stick to the road and wear out from lots of kms of racing than "doing a skid bro".





mdooher
Hmm, what to write...
1476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 935

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2428100 27-Feb-2020 10:57
Send private message quote this post

trig42:

 

Batman:

 

the penalty for driving 51k above speed limit here is loss of licence for ?28 days iirc

 

 

It's 40+k's over the limit, and this fellow got a 28 day suspension (he was 68k over). 

 

Speeding fines (actually, all driving infringements) are too lenient here. Compare it to Australia (QLD anyway), he would have had a $1245 fine, 6 months suspension and 8 Demerits (of a possible 10). Another thing, in Aus, do something again within 12 months, and the demerits are doubled. 

 

Interestingly, in QLD (maybe others) if you get a camera speeding fine in a work vehicle, the fine is 5x the standard unless the business nominates you (so that you also cop the demerits). Why don't we copy their system?

 

 

because although "speed was a factor" in a reasonable percentage of crashes it was not a causative factor in all but a very few. So it not sensible to fine people exorbitant amounts of money when they are not actually significantly increasing the risk to the road going public.

 

 





Matthew


Geektastic
18033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8497

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2428103 27-Feb-2020 11:04
Send private message quote this post

mdooher:

 

 

 

because although "speed was a factor" in a reasonable percentage of crashes it was not a causative factor in all but a very few. So it not sensible to fine people exorbitant amounts of money when they are not actually significantly increasing the risk to the road going public.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pour encourager les autres...






1 | ... | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | ... | 140
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.