Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




999 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 219

Subscriber

Topic # 144194 10-May-2014 16:58
Send private message

Yes - I received one ... no wait, make that two....and thus my question.sealed
<aside> Before I start - please don't tell me I should have registered the vehicle earlier or got a warrant earlier or anything similar - not interested in hearing that - and if you want to say it, instead of hating maybe you could fly to Whitianga and collect the money owed to me by an ex-client who didn't pay leaving me  very short over Christmas, or the corporate who didn't pay leaving me short over Christmas, or the other five companies who didn't pay ... you get the message. </aside> This is about legality of 'double dipping' on the fines.

When I was younger you couldn't get a warrant unless you had a current rego  - that was cool as getting a rego didn't require anything more than rocking up with the dollars and paying for it.
Now days you cant get a rego without getting a warrant and if you get caught without a warrant you also get fined for not having a rego - thus the double dipping.

Short story - I want to get a WOF - failed because the Right Front Headlight would do Hi-beam and park but not low-beam. I also needed to get the lens coveres polished as they were scratched. Filled out rego form and tried to get rego - cant as no WOF.  No problems. Left the WOf station, purchased the polisher (damn that's expensive stuff) and found repco didn't have bulbs for my van.

I put the WOF inspection sheet and the rego form I had filled out in windscreen - visible to all who might look, and drove into town two days later, with the van as there were two options for the bulbs and wanted to make sure I got the right ones. No problems - nothing illegal there.

Replaced bulb in RF light, also replaced bulb in LF light (might as well have two new ones - matching pair and an old one as a spare in the glove box ) and also replaced the park light bulbs - means there is a new set all around. Got home, tested the lights against my garage door - RF is gone again. Bother!!!!!

Next day scafolder un-installers turned up (we hadn't been warned they were coming that day) as they had to remove scaffold put up so they could repair our earthquake damaged chimney area. They needed to go up and down the drive so I moved my van onto the street outside my house. It turns out we have a person living on our street who phones the council if he spots a vehicle minus rego and/or warrant on the street and gets the enforcement unit around.  I get back from work (having borrowed my wife's car) to find I have two tickets - one for no current evidence of inspection and one for rego. 2 x $200 = $400. Ouch.

My questions - Isn't that double dipping? I have evidence of trying to register my vehicle and the Govt process says I cant. Having tried, and with no legitimate reason why a rego and WOF should be tied together (remember in the past they were not tied and then tied in the other order) is it fair / just / legal to double fine a person? It feels like I tried to do the right thing paying for a rego but got stopped by the govt than fined for not having one.

Second question - Current Evidence of Inspection - doesn't a current WOf inspection sheet count? i know i cant go driving anywhere i want with just the inspection sheet but parked outside my own house?

Lastly - my rant against the council - Grow up!!!!! Ticketing a person who has to park their vehicle on the road outside their own house because they are having earthquake repairs done and turning down the request to waive is just another sign that reinforces my belief that all beaurecrats must have a full frontal lobotomy and any vestiges of common sense and decency removed before taking up their jobs - or maybe its just that bureaucracy and the enforcement unit attract little people who need to make themselves feel important by exercising pointless authority over others. Little man syndrome in my opinion.






nunz

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
221 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 81


  Reply # 1041403 10-May-2014 17:10
Send private message

I agree it seems unfair, but I'm sure it's legal.  If you manage to prove it wasn't, I suspect a lot of people would be due refunds :)   You can renew your rego as long as the WOF is current (even if it only has 1 day left on it).  So I try to keep my rego paid up well ahead of my WOF meaning if the same thing happens at least I only get one fine.


Baby Get Shaky!
1528 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 375

Subscriber

  Reply # 1041405 10-May-2014 17:20
Send private message

IMHO No it is not double dipping. The Police, depending on how they feel, would ticket you for both as well (not to mention giving you demerits).
"Current evidence of inspection" means a valid WOF not a piece of paper saying a failure. 

One thing you haven't mentioned is how far out your WOF and Rego are? Councils are usually good at waving enforcement tickets if they are within 30 days of expiry if you can prove that compliance is in the works, anything over that and you're likely out of luck.


 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software
11171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3539

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1041408 10-May-2014 17:27
Send private message

It's a mite unfair, but probably legal.

In the UK by way of comparison, if your rego (known as Vehicle Excise Duty or 'tax disc') is late, at 1 minute past midnight on the day it should have been renewed the computer will simply print and mail you the fine notice...!!





6142 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3101


  Reply # 1041414 10-May-2014 17:37
One person supports this post
Send private message

Write a letter to council explaining the circumstances, include a copy of the WOF rejection and mention when it was booked in for a recheck.
Sometimes council are reasonable - but they definitely won't waive the fine if their records show you've had a previous infringement for WOF/Reg.


641 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1041421 10-May-2014 17:46
Send private message

Toothpaste would have worked as the lens cleaner.

640 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Subscriber

  Reply # 1041422 10-May-2014 17:48
Send private message

I'd agree with Fred99.
I was caught out in a similar situation, wrote a letter including copies of all the information, and my fine was waived.

640 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Subscriber

  Reply # 1041446 10-May-2014 18:34
Send private message

Zippity: Toothpaste would have worked as the lens cleaner.


For really hazy lenses, 1200-1600 grit with hand soap. Then a buffing compound.

Aussie
4187 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1179

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1041457 10-May-2014 18:59
Send private message

Sidestep:
Zippity: Toothpaste would have worked as the lens cleaner.


For really hazy lenses, 1200-1600 grit with hand soap. Then a buffing compound.

1200-1600 wet and dry...
Don't buy the dry paper and get it wet! :)

3049 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 902

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1041478 10-May-2014 20:25
One person supports this post
Send private message

kingjj: One thing you haven't mentioned is how far out your WOF and Rego are? Councils are usually good at waving enforcement tickets if they are within 30 days of expiry if you can prove that compliance is in the works, anything over that and you're likely out of luck. 


This is very relevant, although I think you should say some councils as Wellington City Council seem to have a strict policy of not budging a millimeter once a ticket has been issued.

nunz: the WOF checksheet is evidence of inspection (you wouldn't have one if the vehicle hadn't been inspected) and should give you 28 days grace. Write the council a [polite] letter, as Fred99 says, laying out the circumstances as you've posted here and see what the response is. 

490 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  Reply # 1041479 10-May-2014 20:27
One person supports this post
Send private message

I know a guy who got off tickets similar to this because they used the wording "operated a vehicle..." but he wasn't operating it. it was parked


2503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 928

Subscriber

  Reply # 1041482 10-May-2014 20:32
One person supports this post
Send private message

Dratsab:
nunz: the WOF checksheet is evidence of inspection (you wouldn't have one if the vehicle hadn't been inspected) and should give you 28 days grace.


The 28-day grace period is exclusively to drive the vehicle to get repaired and reinspected, and does not allow a grace period for parking on public roads. Some councils will be lenient, others won't, but by letter of the law, you can't park on a public road during said grace period.




Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

2389 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 267


  Reply # 1041532 10-May-2014 22:57
Send private message

Operating includes parking.

28 days grace only applies to retest fees nothing else.

Evidence of inspection is the WOF sticker in the windscreen not a check sheet.

778 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 173


  Reply # 1041631 11-May-2014 11:06
Send private message

I agree with knowing when the expiry dates are. You might be able to write in and explain why you were on the road that day if you are not far out of expiry.

The rego needing a wof thing is to stop crappy cars getting half the fine they deserve. Some people still registered their cars without a wof. Now you can't and (hopefully) forces a wof check or bigger fine of caught.

4955 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1318

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 1041633 11-May-2014 11:23
Send private message

local govt. will be too money hungry to waive it

1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 1041637 11-May-2014 11:37
2 people support this post
Send private message

Personally I've found the Police are more accepting of people in your situation and (can) give you a few days to present the (paperwork) evidence that you were resolving the issue. Maybe because they're public focused.....

Councils on the other hand seem to troll carparks looking for these types of revenue opportunities.

 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Umbrellar becomes Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider
Posted 22-May-2018 15:43


Three New Zealand projects shortlisted in IDC Asia Pacific Smart Cities Awards
Posted 22-May-2018 15:14


UpStarters - the New Zealand tech and innovation story
Posted 21-May-2018 09:55


Lightbox updates platform with new streaming options
Posted 17-May-2018 13:09


Norton Core router launches with high-performance, IoT security in New Zealand
Posted 16-May-2018 02:00


D-Link ANZ launches new 4G LTE Dual SIM M2M VPN Router
Posted 15-May-2018 19:30


New Panasonic LUMIX FT7 ideal for outdoor: waterproof, dustproof
Posted 15-May-2018 19:17


Ryanair Goes All-In on AWS
Posted 15-May-2018 19:14


Te Papa and EQC Minecraft Mod shakes up earthquake education
Posted 15-May-2018 19:12


Framing Facebook: It’s not about technology
Posted 14-May-2018 16:02


Vocus works with NZ Police and telcos to stop scam calls
Posted 12-May-2018 11:12


Vista Group signs Aeon Entertainment, largest cinema chain in Japan
Posted 11-May-2018 21:41


New Privacy Trust Mark certifies privacy and customer control
Posted 10-May-2018 14:16


New app FIXR connects vehicle owners to top Mechanics at best prices
Posted 10-May-2018 14:13


Nutanix Beam gives enterprises control of the cloud
Posted 10-May-2018 14:09



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.