Recently an accident happened at this intersection when a car turning left collided with a cyclist going straight through. The cycle ran into the turning car more-or-less in the B-pillar/rear door area.

It's clear that a car crossing a cycle lane (to enter a driveway for example) has to give way to any cycles in the lane. At intersections a lot of drivers assume the left-turning lane gives them right-of-way to turn left. But it seems that in fact you have to give way to traffic in the inside lane and behind you, which in heavy traffic or poor weather can be mighty hard to spot.
What isn't clear to me whether lanes actually exist in "intersections" where there are no markings. If they do then in this situation the turning lane and the straight-through cycle lane must cross over each other, which doesn't seem a sensible lane arrangement.
Any thoughts?


