Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Gurezaemon
~HONYAKKER!~
1418 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2286325 31-Jul-2019 11:11
Send private message

Earbanean:

Gurezaemon: It's a sad fact, however, that out of this list, I wouldn't be surprised that only the names Richie McCaw and Taika Waititi would be recognized by the average Joe or Jill in the street. I'm reasonably well-educated, and like to consider myself reasonably well-informed, but I frankly couldn't have told you who half of the people on that list were. I'm happy the other award-winners were recognized, but the social recognition that sportspeople have cannot be understated.

 

Yeah, but name recognition isn't the same thing.  Kim Kardashian would probably trump all these on recognition, but that doesn't make her a hero to anyone.  I seriously hope it doesn't...

 

 

I agree 100%. The awards may go a small way towards rectifying the unbalance, but as long as average people spend a lazy Saturday watching sport on TV instead of documentaries about science, medicine, or the arts (or more to the point engaging in these activities directly), then I don't hold out a lot of hope that society as a whole will improve.



Earbanean
1111 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 377


  #2286340 31-Jul-2019 11:23
Send private message

Interesting view.  So people need to spend their spare time watching documentaries and educating/bettering themselves?  If we choose to unwind by watching some sport, or taking in a Marvel movie, or having a few drinks, etc, etc, then society is doomed?


Handsomedan
7772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7412

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2286342 31-Jul-2019 11:24
Send private message

So...back to the subject at hand...Who doesn't like Rugby? 

 

 

 

I'm not a massive fan. I don't dislike it, but I am not one to watch a game on telly if there's something better on. 

 

 

 

I am, however, a HUGE football fan and will watch many, many games of said kickball at any opportunity. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...




Gurezaemon
~HONYAKKER!~
1418 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2286349 31-Jul-2019 11:31
Send private message

Earbanean:

Interesting view.  So people need to spend their spare time watching documentaries and educating/bettering themselves?  If we choose to unwind by watching some sport, or taking in a Marvel movie, or having a few drinks, etc, etc, then society is doomed?

 

 

Nah, I wouldn't go that far. I enjoy all of those things. I just wish that there was more of a focus on people outside of sport and entertainment being held up as role models. The Stephen Hawkings of this world, rather than the Kim Kardashians.

alasta
6891 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3365

Trusted
Subscriber

  #2286353 31-Jul-2019 11:40
Send private message

networkn:

 

I don't recall many people referring to Rugby Players (Or actually any sports I follow) as hero's. I have heard them referred to as excellent role models and I believe some of them are.

 

 

That's a fair point. I have zero interest in rugby but my landlord is a well known professional rugby player and he is a thoroughly nice guy who genuinely believes in family and social equity.

 

It must be really tough for those young guys to be thrust into the media spotlight and expected to act as role models when they themselves haven't had much of an opportunity to build up their life experience.


GV27
5978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2286357 31-Jul-2019 11:44
Send private message

Gurezaemon:
Earbanean:

 

Gurezaemon: It's a sad fact, however, that out of this list, I wouldn't be surprised that only the names Richie McCaw and Taika Waititi would be recognized by the average Joe or Jill in the street. I'm reasonably well-educated, and like to consider myself reasonably well-informed, but I frankly couldn't have told you who half of the people on that list were. I'm happy the other award-winners were recognized, but the social recognition that sportspeople have cannot be understated.

 

Yeah, but name recognition isn't the same thing.  Kim Kardashian would probably trump all these on recognition, but that doesn't make her a hero to anyone.  I seriously hope it doesn't...

 

I agree 100%. The awards may go a small way towards rectifying the unbalance, but as long as average people spend a lazy Saturday watching sport on TV instead of documentaries about science, medicine, or the arts (or more to the point engaging in these activities directly), then I don't hold out a lot of hope that society as a whole will improve.

 

At some point you are dictating to people what is and isn't a valid form of cultural expression, and the whole debate takes a somewhat totalitarian bent.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
Gurezaemon
~HONYAKKER!~
1418 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2286358 31-Jul-2019 11:50
Send private message

GV27:

Gurezaemon:
Earbanean:

 

Gurezaemon: It's a sad fact, however, that out of this list, I wouldn't be surprised that only the names Richie McCaw and Taika Waititi would be recognized by the average Joe or Jill in the street. I'm reasonably well-educated, and like to consider myself reasonably well-informed, but I frankly couldn't have told you who half of the people on that list were. I'm happy the other award-winners were recognized, but the social recognition that sportspeople have cannot be understated.

 

Yeah, but name recognition isn't the same thing.  Kim Kardashian would probably trump all these on recognition, but that doesn't make her a hero to anyone.  I seriously hope it doesn't...

 

I agree 100%. The awards may go a small way towards rectifying the unbalance, but as long as average people spend a lazy Saturday watching sport on TV instead of documentaries about science, medicine, or the arts (or more to the point engaging in these activities directly), then I don't hold out a lot of hope that society as a whole will improve.

 

At some point you are dictating to people what is and isn't a valid form of cultural expression, and the whole debate takes a somewhat totalitarian bent.

 

 

Not dictating. Just bemoaning :)

GV27
5978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2286366 31-Jul-2019 12:09
Send private message

Gurezaemon:

 

Not dictating. Just bemoaning :)

 

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think the world is considerably better off that I spend my weekends watching sport rather than practicing medicine 😉

 

There tends to be two schools of thought about these sorts of things; one is that culture is incredibly prescriptive and that only certain things qualify as 'culture' and the counter "all things are worth studying because people enjoy them for some reason and the underlying reason is the thing we should be studying, not an arbitrary test of what is and isn't culture which excludes huge swathes of the population by default and therefore can't be that relevant to understanding society as a whole".

 

No prizes for guessing where I sit on this one. 


Gurezaemon
~HONYAKKER!~
1418 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2286377 31-Jul-2019 12:31
Send private message

GV27:

Gurezaemon:

 

Not dictating. Just bemoaning :)

 

Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think the world is considerably better off that I spend my weekends watching sport rather than practicing medicine 😉

 

There tends to be two schools of thought about these sorts of things; one is that culture is incredibly prescriptive and that only certain things qualify as 'culture' and the counter "all things are worth studying because people enjoy them for some reason and the underlying reason is the thing we should be studying, not an arbitrary test of what is and isn't culture which excludes huge swathes of the population by default and therefore can't be that relevant to understanding society as a whole".

 

No prizes for guessing where I sit on this one. 

 

 

I actually agree with you on this. I used to be very dismissive of people trying to excel at leisure activities, trying to improve themselves. However, advancing years make me more aware of the limited time we have, and it has made me more open to the idea of doing something that although totally impractical, gives you something to look forward to. Watching my kids strive and learn life skills through their sport has also changed my perspective.

 

That is why I decided on a whim to start HEMA, and find that I actually enjoy hitting people with longswords, although outside of a zombie apocalypse, the skill-set required is less than useful in the real world.

Movieman
Movieman
3835 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2533

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2293623 10-Aug-2019 17:35
Send private message

I don't dislike Rugby. I will probably watch tonight's Test Match against Aussie, and International's are mostly what I watch.

 

Give me a game of Football any day. I am originally from Yorkshire, and I hardly ever missed a Huddersfield Town home game when I lived there.

 

When I first arrived in NZ (1975) footballers were called "The Kiss and Kick Boys" 😄 Thankfully NZers now have a greater appreciation for my beloved game. 

 

Also, coming from the North of England, I like Rugby League. I am a regular viewer of the English Super League (Go Giants) and the NRL (Go Warriors). 





MAN CAVE: 2025 TCL C7K 75" QD Mini LED TV - Apple TV 4K 32gb (2nd Gen) - Samsung HW Q990F Soundbar - Panasonic DP-UB820 4K Blu-ray Player - Apple Airpods Max - LIVING ROOM: 2021 Sony 75” X95J LCD/LED TV - Apple TV 4K 32gb (1st Gen) - 2 x Apple Homepods Gen.2 (paired) - TECH: iPhone 15 Plus, iPad Gen. 10, Apple Watch SE.


floydbloke
3648 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4555

ID Verified

  #2294721 12-Aug-2019 12:08
Send private message

Rugby ranks 3rd on my list of sports I like to watch, behind football and cricket.  In saying that, a good game of rugby is better to watch than a bad game of football (and vice versa of course).

 

I've probably become more frustrated with watching it over the years; I really struggle with the rules when the ball is amongst the forwards, the video ref is way too involved now and I don't like the way a referee can put his hand up to say a try a is scored and then go and review, and scrums annoy me too with lots of resets when 95% of the time the team putting in gets the ball anyway.

 

(Football and cricket have some annoyances for me as well of course, but this thread is about rugby.)





Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2294736 12-Aug-2019 12:34
Send private message

I am going to like rugby for a week. Very like, as in sleep eat dream rugby, but after this week it will be back to unlike for until about September, depending on how the Spark Sport saga plays out.


Deamo
144 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 63
Inactive user


  #2294758 12-Aug-2019 13:22
Send private message

I dislike rugby.

 

I will watch the odd game of league like state of origin, but that's as far as my interest goes in any form of rugby.

 

Other sports like Hockey, Cricket, Athletics, Cycling (track & road), I'll absolutely watch whenever I can.


kingdragonfly
11996 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12893

Subscriber

  #2307317 28-Aug-2019 14:27
Send private message

I don't mind All-Black rugby, but the news coverage is ridiculous.

I watch TV 1 mid-day news, because its short, and sports are usually not a major portion of the coverage.

However every time the All Blacks do anything, it's becomes the lead new item.

Today's All Black announcement was literally 18 minutes.

News coverage, including life threatening measles, was 6 minutes.

So the All Blacks are 3X more important than all other news combined.

Gurezaemon
~HONYAKKER!~
1418 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2307325 28-Aug-2019 14:34
Send private message

kingdragonfly: I don't mind All-Black rugby, but the news coverage is ridiculous.

I watch TV 1 mid-day news, because its short, and sports are usually not a major portion of the coverage.

However every time the All Blacks do anything, it's becomes the lead new item.

Today's All Black announcement was literally 18 minutes.

News coverage, including life threatening measles, was 6 minutes.

So the All Blacks are 3X more important than all other news combined.

 

^This.

 

The announcement of the world cup team is no doubt a big deal to a lot of people, but it doesn't belong on the news segment of the news.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.