frankv:
There's no need for 60 list MPs. I think MMP is a good thing, and it was a scam to use its introduction as an excuse (a) to increase Parliamentary seats to 120+, and (b) to give so much voting power to the Party Faithful as opposed to the People's Representatives.
I don't see why we need list MPs at all. List MPs have to vote on party lines, so are functionally just extra votes given to the party leader.
If a party has <10 electorate MPs, allow them up to 10 list MPs in accordance with their share of votes. That allows a few actual people on the ground to do political work.
Additional influence in parliament would be by way of extra votes. That's not miles away form how it works now, where party whips can use wield votes for their party.
Under such a system the greens would have 10 MPs and 4 additional votes. National would have 41 MPs and 19 additional votes. That's 23 less MPs right there. It Such system would also make it difficult to become a minister without winning and electorate.



