![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
kingdragonfly: You might not realize how even the most ill-informed American knows about the tennis star and anti-vaxxer Novak Djokovic ejection from Australia.
Let me guess, Fox "News"?
I dunno how neutral The Guardian is, but this headline looked good.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/22/donald-trump-legal-perils
quickymart:
I dunno how neutral The Guardian is, but this headline looked good.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/22/donald-trump-legal-perils
This is just wishful thinking. It doesn't actually say anything substantial. Maybe Trump will be nailed eventually, maybe he won't. That is what it says. The Guardian is fairly left wing.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
quickymart:I dunno how neutral The Guardian is, but this headline looked good.
House of Trump is crumbling’: why ex-president’s legal net is tightening
The Washington Post - Opinion: The legal walls are closing in around Trump
today
Defeated former president Donald Trump just had a really bad week.
He faces, perhaps for the first time in his political career, a real prospect of being held accountable for his conduct in multiple legal challenges.
- Start with New York, where state Attorney General Letitia James showed her hand in the pending civil investigation into the Trump Organization’s finances. ...
- Meanwhile, Trump’s risk of criminal liability escalated in the case in Georgia concerning his attempt to bully secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to “find” just enough votes to reverse Georgia’s election outcome. ...
- As if that were not enough, the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection won a round at the Supreme Court, which summarily dismissed Trump’s efforts to invoke executive privilege to prevent the National Archives from turning over documents relating to the actions of his administration that day. ...
As Elizabeth McElvein and Benjamin Wittes explain at Lawfare:
Put simply, the former president, whether he knows it or not, is now in a dramatically weaker position with respect to the committee.
The new legal landscape, for example, almost certainly means that two top Trump officials - former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadow and former top adviser Stephen K. Bannon - can no longer argue that the privilege prevents them from cooperating with the committee.
The same applies to other potential witnesses, and to the former president himself, should the committee seek his testimony.
Sideface
kingdragonfly:
California has with
390.039 million people. Wyoming has about 0.6 million residents. But the both get two Senators.
FTFY
'He stole from me' - Stormy Daniels testifies at her ex-lawyers trial - BBC News
Remember when Avenatti was world-famous and people thought he could bring Trump down? At the end he seems to be just another scammer in the world.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Schadenfreude department ...
The Guardian - Melania Trump’s auction of NFT, hat and painting fall short of $250,000 opening bid
today
What do Melania Trump’s wide-brimmed white hat, a painting of her wearing the hat and an NFT of an animated version of the hat have in common?
They were all put up for auction by the former first lady – and as of early Wednesday, failed to rake in the target price of a $250,000 opening bid.
Trump announced earlier this month that she would auction off the autographed hat, which she wore to meet the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife during an official state visit in 2018. The auction also included a watercolor painting of herself wearing the hat and a non-fungible token, or NFT, of the painting.
She insisted that all bids be made in Solana tokens, a cryptocurrency.
When the auction concluded on Wednesday there were only five bids on the items, each around the minimum requirement of 1,800 Solana tokens.
Although the minimum number of tokens was met, a steep dive in the crypto market over the last two weeks resulted in the final bid being approximately $170,000 – about $80,000 short of the opening bid threshold.
Karma 😶
Sideface
I'm amazed that any of his or her followers could even afford to buy such narcissistic crap, so I guess I'm not amazed her over-inflated reserve price wasn't met 😄
Sideface:strong>The Guardian - Melania Trump’s auction of NFT, hat and painting fall short of $250,000 opening bid
Sideface:
What do Melania Trump’s wide-brimmed white hat, a painting of her wearing the hat and an NFT of an animated version of the hat have in common?
They were all put up for auction by the former first lady – and as of early Wednesday, failed to rake in the target price of a $250,000 opening bid.
Trump announced earlier this month that she would auction off the autographed hat, which she wore to meet the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and his wife during an official state visit in 2018. The auction also included a watercolor painting of herself wearing the hat and a non-fungible token, or NFT, of the painting.
She insisted that all bids be made in Solana tokens, a cryptocurrency.
When the auction concluded on Wednesday there were only five bids on the items, each around the minimum requirement of 1,800 Solana tokens.
Although the minimum number of tokens was met, a steep dive in the crypto market over the last two weeks resulted in the final bid being approximately $170,000 – about $80,000 short of the opening bid threshold.
Karma 😶
Which begs the question: W.T.F does Melonia need to sell her gear? I mean, married to a 'very rich' multi-billionaire and all...
'Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.' Voltaire
'A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.' Edward Abbey
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |