|
|
|
That's why they are called banana republics!
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
LOL, Lindsey Graham. One of the more useless Republicans in the senate. Funny how he hated on Trump like there was no tomorrow back in 2016, then as soon as he won, he couldn't be Trump's friend fast enough. Almost like My Kevin 🙄
If only.
Trump crowned? No faux King way!
trumpswag.com
I bet Trump would be absolutely ecstatic to see someone making money off his ("good"?) name and he doesn't get a cent whatsoever 😃
God some of that stuff is just so...tacky 😣
(I didn't post the link properly so it doesn't show as a referral from Geekzone 👍)
Fittingly describes how MAGA morons think:

I remember reading about that meeting, apparently there was a lot of shouting and screaming (power struggle?) and a number of participants were extremely unimpressed that Trump wanted Powell designated with some sort of "special counsel" bs role to investigate apparent "election fraud". Fortunately that didn't come to pass, and later on she was basically cut off from the rest of the "legal team" (emphasis mine) that was looking into all of this so-called election fraud 🙄
Okay, this is kinda...terrifying: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/08/politics/trump-campaign-promises/index.html
Alternatively, it could also signal that he's got his 2016 crew back together. They took his speeches, cut them into 15-second slices, and checked them against various Facebook demographics, in Facebook terms Custom Audiences, then refined the ones that got a response. They ran hundreds of thousands of video creatives, meaning ad variants, to see which ones worked best, the record being 175,000 variations of one ad in one day. When one Custom Audience group responded well they used a tool called Lookalike Audiences to find nonobvious but algorithmically selected alternative Custom Audiences that would also respond well. The system was designed to make commercial advertising more effective but they just used it to make their horse run faster than anyone else's (Cambridge Analytica got all the flak because they pulled the data out of Facebook to do this, if you did it within Facebook and they got paid nothing happened). They also used multiple competing ad agencies to find and target new demographics and then at the end of the day whoever got the best numbers got the money. Some of them boasted that they could modify his speeches in real time to maximise audience response.
So what you could be seeing isn't campaign promises but just algorithmically selected bumf chosen to maximise audience response.
|
|
|