Christchurch Mosque Shooting

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification

Forums › Politics › Christchurch Mosque Shooting

1 | ... | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | ... | 79

7345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2117

ID Verified

#2201527 19-Mar-2019 12:21

Corrin dan talked to some well versed Islamic women on a 1:1 show I forget the name of.

They said the same straight to him when he asked about the trial. Their reply was Media have a responsibility in regards to it. And she challenged them to restraint and to make the difference. If it turned out it was his intention to not gratify it.

chatterbox

204 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 108

#2201528 19-Mar-2019 12:21

networkn:
Rikkitic:

Violent assault is blasting someone with a firearm, or smashing your partner in the face, or going after someone with a bat. An egg is not a weapon. It is a statement. It can't hurt anyone. I am all in favour of it as a measured response to someone like that racist a-hole. Just look at the discussion it has engendered! A million signatures! No polite words could have achieved that.

That's a disappointing response. I'd have thought better of you. It was a violent action taken in anger. The law obviously agrees as he has been charged. He will get a slap with a wet bus ticket.

We are heading down a slipperly slope once we start with the "ends justify the means" discussion.

Always interesting how we can watch the same video and come to vastly different conclusions. There is no way I can categorize an egging as ‘violent’.

The definition involves to hurt damage or kill. He didn’t kill him and the only thing hurt or damaged is Annings reputation. Will probably end up as a misdemeanor or something.

Anning also needs to be charged. His actions were hardly self defense. Lashed out twice in anger on a teenager that was obviously intent on filming his reaction.

If Anning has any sense he would drop the case. Be the man.

Never say never

tdgeek

30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201534 19-Mar-2019 12:33

MSD have just sent out emails offering financial help for those with expenses relating to Friday. That's quite good. I didn't expect it to be a mass email, more targeted to the families? And possibly directly? But in any case, good to see.

Batman

Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201548 19-Mar-2019 12:55

chatterbox:
networkn:
Rikkitic:

Violent assault is blasting someone with a firearm, or smashing your partner in the face, or going after someone with a bat. An egg is not a weapon. It is a statement. It can't hurt anyone. I am all in favour of it as a measured response to someone like that racist a-hole. Just look at the discussion it has engendered! A million signatures! No polite words could have achieved that.

That's a disappointing response. I'd have thought better of you. It was a violent action taken in anger. The law obviously agrees as he has been charged. He will get a slap with a wet bus ticket.

We are heading down a slipperly slope once we start with the "ends justify the means" discussion.

Always interesting how we can watch the same video and come to vastly different conclusions. There is no way I can categorize an egging as ‘violent’.

The definition involves to hurt damage or kill. He didn’t kill him and the only thing hurt or damaged is Annings reputation. Will probably end up as a misdemeanor or something.

Anning also needs to be charged. His actions were hardly self defense. Lashed out twice in anger on a teenager that was obviously intent on filming his reaction.

If Anning has any sense he would drop the case. Be the man.

If anyone feels egging is fine, please send me your name and work number, we can arrange on Monday to get your colleagues, preferably someone from a rival company, best if it were your teenager's boyfriend. When you are in your best attire at 11 am on Monday we will arrange for them to smash a carton of eggs on any part of your body they so choose to. Should be fine. No hard feelings ok.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80662 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41090

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#2201556 19-Mar-2019 12:59

No different than a pie. I see it as a protest.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

#2201565 19-Mar-2019 13:12

There used to be a guy who went around pie-ing prominent people. I remember he got Bill Gates once in Belgium.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

Sideface

9652 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15607

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201568 19-Mar-2019 13:18

Let's get back to the real problem here ...

Sideface

tdgeek

30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201592 19-Mar-2019 13:40

Sideface:

Let's get back to the real problem here ...

Exactly right, the owner of the foot is more important than the incidentals

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

#2201593 19-Mar-2019 13:40

I don't believe you can change the thinking of people who have already gone down this path. But you can take their megaphones away, and you can isolate and minimise them and make it loud and clear what is wrong with their ideas.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

networkn

Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15475

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201600 19-Mar-2019 13:41

Rikkitic:

I don't believe you can change the thinking of people who have already gone down this path. But you can take their megaphones away, and you can isolate and minimise them and make it loud and clear what is wrong with their ideas.

Isolation is what I believe lead to this attack.

networkn

Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15475

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201603 19-Mar-2019 13:43

It would be very interesting to me to see what the gunmans views on his crimes are 20 years and 40 years from now.

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

#2201606 19-Mar-2019 13:47

networkn:

Isolation is what I believe lead to this attack.

You are missing the point. He clearly wasn't isolated from the poison that fed his thinking or the audience he was broadcasting to.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

#2201639 19-Mar-2019 14:00

networkn:

It would be very interesting to me to see what the gunmans views on his crimes are 20 years and 40 years from now.

Leslie Van Houten says she is sorry.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

networkn

Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15475

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2201691 19-Mar-2019 14:20

Rikkitic:

networkn:

It would be very interesting to me to see what the gunmans views on his crimes are 20 years and 40 years from now.

Leslie Van Houten says she is sorry.

Says she is, or actually is?

It's probably not for this thread, but I often wonder how long a particular action, spoken word or whatever should haunt someone for. Obviously, mass murder aside. When I see people doing good work now, and then someone finds a horrendous video from 15 years ago and people are calling for resignations etc....

I often think back to my younger years and truly cringe at what I thought, or may have said. I would hate to be judged by that today, because a) I am genuinely different and feel differently now b) because whilst at the time those actions didn't seem harmful or bad, I didn't have the experience, alternative perspective and resources to see what I can see now.

I expect a few years from now, things may be different again.

chatterbox

204 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 108

#2201694 19-Mar-2019 14:22

Batman:
chatterbox:
networkn:

Rikkitic:

Violent assault is blasting someone with a firearm, or smashing your partner in the face, or going after someone with a bat. An egg is not a weapon. It is a statement. It can't hurt anyone. I am all in favour of it as a measured response to someone like that racist a-hole. Just look at the discussion it has engendered! A million signatures! No polite words could have achieved that.

That's a disappointing response. I'd have thought better of you. It was a violent action taken in anger. The law obviously agrees as he has been charged. He will get a slap with a wet bus ticket.

We are heading down a slipperly slope once we start with the "ends justify the means" discussion.

Always interesting how we can watch the same video and come to vastly different conclusions. There is no way I can categorize an egging as ‘violent’.

The definition involves to hurt damage or kill. He didn’t kill him and the only thing hurt or damaged is Annings reputation. Will probably end up as a misdemeanor or something.

Anning also needs to be charged. His actions were hardly self defense. Lashed out twice in anger on a teenager that was obviously intent on filming his reaction.

If Anning has any sense he would drop the case. Be the man.

If anyone feels egging is fine, please send me your name and work number, we can arrange on Monday to get your colleagues, preferably someone from a rival company, best if it were your teenager's boyfriend. When you are in your best attire at 11 am on Monday we will arrange for them to smash a carton of eggs on any part of your body they so choose to. Should be fine. No hard feelings ok.

Context is important (eg killing in self defence vs a planned execution). So randomly egging someone to prove a point about someone else egging someone else? Nope.

I definitely feel Annings actions and words were much more harmful than the egging he received.

Never say never

1 | ... | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | ... | 79