Rikkitic:
Wiggum:
The graph is actually pointless.
As per the website:
Absence of a definition of homelessness, agreed to by most nations, hampers meaningful comparisons.
Its similar to the definition of "Poverty". Its definition is different depending on where you are in the world.
Poverty as defined in New Zealand are the households that make less than 60 per cent of the median disposable income.
Its got nothing to do with how much food the poor have, or where they sleep, or if they have shoes. Instead its based on what most people in NZ earn. Therefore no matter how rich we get, we will always have a class of people that are described as living in poverty. Thats why I never take any NZ politician seriously when they start talking about poverty in NZ. We really have none. Its an insult to countries that face actual poverty. We very lucky in NZ, everybody here is actually very well off when compared to most of the rest of the world.
You sure do know a lot. Such an expert on housing, social welfare, politics, what have you. Full of declamations. This is, that isn't, no room for doubt at all. In fact, you sound a lot like Donald Trump. You must have so much life experience. I bet you're rich as well. Ahh, such wisdom. It drips. Off. You.
My you sure resentful. What has my financial status got to do with anything? You got something against the rich or wealthy it seems? Tall poppy Syndrome maybe?