|
|
|
Trump is full of hot air, and he even managed to contradict himself a few times. Gloat over not paying taxes etc.
If his mission was to appear presidential, he completely failed. If he wanted to actually say anything specific about his policies, he did an equally bad job.
Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.
mattwnz:
She is almost too stage managed and rehearsed.
And Trump can only get better (hopefully) because Clinton has peaked, maybe too early. The only people not to speak so far are the silent majority, they will have the loudest voice in this election.
jarledb:
If his mission was to appear presidential, he completely failed. If he wanted to actually say anything specific about his policies, he did an equally bad job.
I seem to remember Ronald Reagan being pretty bad during his time but has gone down as one of America's best and most loved.
"No matter what time it is, wake me, even if it's in the middle of a Cabinet meeting." - Ronald Reagan.
networkn:SumnerBoy:Sideface:Hillary won the debate by a country mile.
+1
Can't believe some people think it was close. He was all over the show, barely answered a question he was asked directly and continuously interrupted Clinton. On the other hand she was calm, measured and to-the-point. She got a bit personal a few times which was probably a little unnecessary but all-in-all it was a landslide from where I was sitting.
Just got to hope like hell the US voters agree!
You only think it wasn't close because you don't understand how Americans think, and or vote. That isn't being disrepectful to them or to you, but it's entirely different. You can't apply Kiwi logic to matters.
cynnicallemon:jarledb:If his mission was to appear presidential, he completely failed. If he wanted to actually say anything specific about his policies, he did an equally bad job.
I seem to remember Ronald Reagan being pretty bad during his time but has gone down as one of America's best and most loved.
gzt: <snip> The main reason for claiming Reagan in recent years is because nobody wanted to claim Bush. They had to go all the way back to the previous republican president and claim that legacy instead. Most loved is just a complete joke. It's a retcon.
If Trump is elected, he'll probably make Bush Junior look good. ![]()
Sideface
cynnicallemon:
I seem to remember Ronald Reagan being pretty bad during his time but has gone down as one of America's best and most loved.
That's coz he single-handedly won the Cold War over them commie bastards, didn't he? Didn't he?
cynnicallemon:
mattwnz:
She is almost too stage managed and rehearsed.
And Trump can only get better (hopefully) because Clinton has peaked, maybe too early. The only people not to speak so far are the silent majority, they will have the loudest voice in this election.
Not sure Clinton has ever peaked. She is boring and predictable. But is a steady hand, and I think the US will be in safe hands. But she is very conservative and doesn't relate to the younger generation.
DarthKermit:
cynnicallemon:
I seem to remember Ronald Reagan being pretty bad during his time but has gone down as one of America's best and most loved.
That's coz he single-handedly won the Cold War over them commie bastards, didn't he? Didn't he?
Not single handed, he had help from Arnie.
Those of you that say he was good certainly missed when she mentioned he didn't pay taxes, to which he replied "That makes me smart"... Nope, that makes him a crook. Or him talking about Obama's birth certificate when the topic was racial discrimination.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
cynnicallemon:
jarledb:
If his mission was to appear presidential, he completely failed. If he wanted to actually say anything specific about his policies, he did an equally bad job.
I seem to remember Ronald Reagan being pretty bad during his time but has gone down as one of America's best and most loved.
"No matter what time it is, wake me, even if it's in the middle of a Cabinet meeting." - Ronald Reagan.
I've probably posted this before - perhaps even in this thread - but it's worthy of reposting IMO:

freitasm:
Those of you that say he was good certainly missed when she mentioned he didn't pay taxes, to which he replied "That makes me smart"... Nope, that makes him a crook. Or him talking about Obama's birth certificate when the topic was racial discrimination.
Not necessarily. If he does not pay taxes because he is bright enough to structure his business affairs in such a way that within the law he pays $x rather than $x+y, he is smart. I suspect that this is what he meant.
If he just admitted to tax evasion on national television, not so much.

Some things which came across loud and clear today relevant to NZ:
Obama would be very unwise to move to push through ratifying TPP before the election, or it will sabotage Clinton. I suspect TPP is dead.
Clinton was very strongly pushing the idea of abolishing student debt - not "reducing the size of it - but eliminating it. That's quite "left wing" - even by NZ standards.
Clinton was also very strongly condemning the concept of "trickle-down" economics, repeatedly stating that it hasn't worked. That's also left wing by NZ standards. Many here still believe it works.
If this seems bad for "business" - laissez-faire free-market "invisible hand" economics, then Trump isn't an alternative. He was talking strongly about imposing tariffs, "punishing" US trade partners, starting global trade wars. Much worse - and extremely worrying for the future of a nation as dependent on international trade as NZ is.
Geektastic:
freitasm:
Those of you that say he was good certainly missed when she mentioned he didn't pay taxes, to which he replied "That makes me smart"... Nope, that makes him a crook. Or him talking about Obama's birth certificate when the topic was racial discrimination.
Not necessarily. If he does not pay taxes because he is bright enough to structure his business affairs in such a way that within the law he pays $x rather than $x+y, he is smart. I suspect that this is what he meant.
If he just admitted to tax evasion on national television, not so much.
He's about as coherent as someone speaking in tongues after they just got bit by a rattlesnake.
Shouldn't need to be "suspecting what he meant". He's a serious contender for POTUS - not some lunatic speaking in tongues - isn't he?
SumnerBoy:
Sideface:
Hillary won the debate by a country mile.
+1
Can't believe some people think it was close. He was all over the show, barely answered a question he was asked directly and continuously interrupted Clinton. On the other hand she was calm, measured and to-the-point. She got a bit personal a few times which was probably a little unnecessary but all-in-all it was a landslide from where I was sitting.
Just got to hope like hell the US voters agree!
US voters probably have not changed their mindset. Probably celebrated Trump's excellent showcase. I expect the next straw poll to show little difference.
|
|
|