More Seth Abramson reckons.

And Seth Abramson's book is coming soon: Proof of Conspiracy: How Trump's International Collusion Is Threatening American Democracy.

freitasm:

 

And Seth Abramson's book is coming soon: Proof of Conspiracy: How Trump's International Collusion Is Threatening American Democracy.

 

For those that may be unaware, that's his second book. His first one, Proof of Collusion, has been available for a while.

And it looks like the White House is in full-on gloat mode.

It's an interesting question. Personally I don't think it would of made a difference. The left hated Trump before the Russia investigation, and they will continue to hate him after. I don't think the investigation changed anyone's minds about anything.

In the case, what is the point of your post?

Rikkitic:

 

In the case, what is the point of your post?

 

 

 

NZGamingIcon:

 

On this very thread, it appears to me that some people are convinced of collusion, and ignoring Mueller's report. ...

 

None of us have seen the Mueller Report yet - only a 4-page summary by a Trump minion.

Vox - Robert Mueller and the collapse of American trust

Mar 25, 2019   (extract)

 

Every piece of information is evaluated less on the merits and more on its provenance.

 

Court rulings are evaluated by whether the deciding judge was appointed by a Republican or a Democrat.

 

Congressional reports are judged by which party controlled the committee that produced them.

 

The reaction to the Barr letter was no exception.

 

Democrats see the attorney general as a hackish Trump loyalist and evaluate the letter through that lens.

 

Republicans see the media as in the tank for the Democrats and thus see the letter as confirmation that they were right to mistrust reporters on the Trump-Russia beat.

 

Sideface:

 

NZGamingIcon:

 

On this very thread, it appears to me that some people are convinced of collusion, and ignoring Mueller's report. ...

 

 

None of us have seen the Mueller Report yet - only a 4-page summary by a Trump minion.

 

Vox - Robert Mueller and the collapse of American trust

 

Mar 25, 2019

 

 

Every piece of information is evaluated less on the merits and more on its provenance.

 

Court rulings are evaluated by whether the deciding judge was appointed by a Republican or a Democrat.

 

Congressional reports are judged by which party controlled the committee that produced them.

 

The reaction to the Barr letter was no exception.

 

Democrats see the attorney general as a hackish Trump loyalist and evaluate the letter through that lens.

 

Republicans see the media as in the tank for the Democrats and thus see the letter as confirmation that they were right to mistrust reporters on the Trump-Russia beat.

 

 

No it was not. I recommend you read the previous two pages and analysis from The Washington Post and the NY Times.

No one has seen the report so we only have whatever the AG is saying - and he was nominated by Trump...

NZGamingIcon:

 

The part about no collusion was quoted from the Mueller report was it not? Are you saying the AG fabricated quotes?

I trust Mueller and his investigation, people trying to undermine him because of their hatred towards Trump are crazy.

 

I trust Mueller - I don't trust Barr to report him accurately.  It's that simple.   😕

freitasm:

 

No it was not. I recommend you read the previous two pages and analysis from The Washington Post and the NY Times.

 

No one has seen the report so we only have whatever the AG is saying - and he was nominated by Trump...

 

NZGamingIcon:

 

freitasm:

 

No it was not. I recommend you read the previous two pages and analysis from The Washington Post and the NY Times.

 

No one has seen the report so we only have whatever the AG is saying - and he was nominated by Trump...

 

I've read the 4 page pdf. It seemed pretty conclusive that there was no Russian collusion by Trump or his team. As for obstruction of justice that was up in the air in regards to Mueller, however the AG and Rosenstein determined there wasn't sufficient evidence for that.

We should get the Mueller report soon once legal redactions have been made to it which should put everything to rest.

 

That PDF is a letter from the AG with his summary. There's a lot of weasel words there and things that look like something but actually mean something else entirely. I recommend reading those sources I mentioned to see how some of the words could have been twisted.

Read this previous post. It is not up to the AG to determine that - it's up to the Congress now.

freitasm:

 

NZGamingIcon:

 

freitasm:

 

No it was not. I recommend you read the previous two pages and analysis from The Washington Post and the NY Times.

 

No one has seen the report so we only have whatever the AG is saying - and he was nominated by Trump...

 

I've read the 4 page pdf. It seemed pretty conclusive that there was no Russian collusion by Trump or his team. As for obstruction of justice that was up in the air in regards to Mueller, however the AG and Rosenstein determined there wasn't sufficient evidence for that.

We should get the Mueller report soon once legal redactions have been made to it which should put everything to rest.

 

 

That PDF is a letter from the AG with his summary. There's a lot of weasel words there and things that look like something but actually mean something else entirely. I recommend reading those sources I mentioned to see how some of the words could have been twisted.

 

freitasm:

 

Read this previous post. It is not up to the AG to determine that - it's up to the Congress now.