Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 

gzt

gzt
19722 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8820

Lifetime subscriber

  #3530718 25-Sep-2026 13:50
Send private message quote this post

tripper1000: I was just watching the news where both Trump and Xi Jinping were both promoting no limits on A.I.

Trump is promoting no limits. Xi's message is quite different and focused on cooperation and safety:



https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/trump-xi-begin-summit-with-nod-to-fierce-ai-rivalry-20260925-p610dj



CYaBro
4766 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1222

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3530721 25-Sep-2026 13:58
Send private message quote this post

cddt:

 

gzt:
cddt: The AI agent is no more accountable for its actions than the stick. The human behind both must be held accountable for his/her actions.

and in a hypothetical case where a human asks an AI to tell them what medical conditions they may be at risk for and the AI decides independently to hack medical records in Australia to determine what their distant relatives died of?

 

If you pull the trigger on a gun, you're responsible for where the bullet ends up, and should be held accountable if it ends up in the wrong place. 

 

In your hypothetical case, the person using the computer program (remember, AI is just a fancy matrix implemented in software) is responsible for any actions the AI may take, be they deliberate, inadvertent, or unintentional. And they should likewise be held accountable if any of these actions are illegal. 

 

Remember, a machine cannot be held accountable. It's a tool. Don't personify it any more than you would a hammer. 

 

 

So if I'm in an autonomous vehicle and it crashes and/or injures/kills someone it's my fault because I told it where to take me?

 

 





Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


cddt
2194 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2167


  #3530725 25-Sep-2026 14:09
Send private message quote this post

CYaBro:

 

So if I'm in an autonomous vehicle and it crashes and/or injures/kills someone it's my fault because I told it where to take me?

 

 

I don't have any examples from NZ, but in the USA there have been several cases where a driver has been criminally prosecuted after their vehicle killed someone whilst using "Full Self-Driving Mode". 

 

So... yes? 




geek3001
568 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 986

ID Verified
Subscriber

  #3530727 25-Sep-2026 14:13
Send private message quote this post

CYaBro:

 

So if I'm in an autonomous vehicle and it crashes and/or injures/kills someone it's my fault because I told it where to take me?

 

 

The answer to that, is that it depends upon the jurisdiction in which the crash occurred, ie: what law applies in the location where the crash happened.

 

The same is true with the Medicare AI breach, what law was broken in Australia and perhaps in the location where the hardware running the AI is located.

 

But that's just my interpretation.

 

Are there any laws that can be relied upon to regulate and deal with (discipline?) the behaviour of AI, or do all countries need to come together to agree on a framework in which AI can function. Albanese saying this is a wake up call suggests there is not one at the moment.

 

We all know about the term Wild West being applied to the Internet.

 

I would argue the Wild West term should be applied to AI too.


CYaBro
4766 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1222

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3530728 25-Sep-2026 14:15
Send private message quote this post

cddt:

 

CYaBro:

 

So if I'm in an autonomous vehicle and it crashes and/or injures/kills someone it's my fault because I told it where to take me?

 

 

I don't have any examples from NZ, but in the USA there have been several cases where a driver has been criminally prosecuted after their vehicle killed someone whilst using "Full Self-Driving Mode". 

 

So... yes? 

 

 

That's not what I said, I said autonomous vehicle, as in no steering wheel or peddles.

 

FSD is still supervised so the drivers should be prosecuted in those cases.





Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


mattwnz
20670 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4921


  #3530736 25-Sep-2026 14:50
Send private message quote this post

It does make me wonder about NZs systems tbh with AI getting more and more powerful and advanced. It appears we are going to be using AI to interact with the web instead of visiting websites. Already if you do a google search, google will give you the answer without the need to visit any website at all so it must also mean websites are getting a lot less traffic over time


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
boosacnoodle
1564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1043


  #3530791 25-Sep-2026 15:42
Send private message quote this post

cddt:

 

Surely a case of unauthorised access to a government computer system should be referred to the police. 

 

Whatever tool someone used, whether an AI agent or by poking a long stick through a window, is irrelevant. 

 

The AI agent is no more accountable for its actions than the stick. The human behind both must be held accountable for his/her actions. 

 

 

Absolutely and to further make the point: when an American-based AI does it, it's a rogue AI that made a simple mistake - but when a China-based AI does it, it's state-sponsoring hacking.

 

Both are hacking. Both are illegal. Both should be prosecuted.

 

If it were you (or I) who hacked ManageMyHealth we would rightly have the Police sicced onto us.

 

Because it's an AI it's, somehow, different? I reject the premise completely.


Stu

Stu
Hammered
8988 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2490

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3530795 25-Sep-2026 16:01
Send private message quote this post

mattwnz:

 

It does make me wonder about NZs systems tbh with AI getting more and more powerful and advanced. It appears we are going to be using AI to interact with the web instead of visiting websites. Already if you do a google search, google will give you the answer without the need to visit any website at all so it must also mean websites are getting a lot less traffic over time

 

 

Google's AI result is quite often totally incorrect. I don't think I've ever seen it's suggestions be 100% accurate.





People often mistake me for an adult because of my age.

 

Keep calm, and carry on posting.

 

Referral Links: Sharesies - 

 

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? If so, please consider supporting us by subscribing.

 

No matter where you go, there you are.


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.