Hi all,
I am a current Vodafone Cable user on a grandfathered 50/2 cable (DOCSIS 3) plan. The connection has always been rock solid, even when others were suffering horrendously through the 'Krapi Cable Congestion' time my connection was always usable, presumably because the load on the node that serves Khandallah was less than it was in other areas.
Because I now need more data than the 80gb cap on my plan provides and a higher upload speed i'm considering my options.
I have been trying to connect to UFB for 10 months now and it has been a nightmare. Our house is a stand alone dwelling with no neighbor consent required and existing services are aerial. On paper this should be the simplest category of UFB installation that Chorus could hope for. Yet it has spent 10 months tripping over it's sub-contractors and somehow trying to progress both aerial and underground options at the same time only to make no progress on either. I understand all the reasons why GPON (real fibre) is better than DOCSIS 3.1 (Fibre X), yet given the prolonged struggle to connect to UFB will no resolution in site, the question I need to ask myself is whether FibreX is good enough..
I acknowledge the threads on here about micro outages and other problems with 'real world' performance. What I would like to know is that, given the node that serves Khandallah seemed to escape previous problems on the cable network, can anyone in my area confirm whether FibreX 200 is stable and providing good service?
Many thanks in advance.