tstone:
Crowds have been going to Eden Park for over 100 years. I think the current surrounding homeowners are well aware of the purpose of Eden Park and the crowds.
The comparison is flawed. In the meantime, there are huge car parks, megawatt loudspeaker systems, vuvuzelas, drums, drunken, inconsiderate fans, etc.
This is not meant to be a counter-argument, but one should look at the matter realistically. In the case of airports, this is compounded by the greatly increased frequency of flights over the years, possibly night flights, etc. As someone who has made this noise himself professionally, I can only say that it is no longer a matter of three or four Tiger Moths on a green field when, for example, a full-grown Airbus weighing 421 t blows out its thrust reversers from four engines because it may have landed too far behind the touchdown point.
Some airports are proactive and offer residents in certain noise cones, for example, a complete, free installation of triple and double-glazed windows in return for a waiver. Everything is not always black or white, by which I mean that one should take the respective concerns seriously and find a common compromise. The joke "buy a cheap house at the airport and found a citizens' initiative against aircraft noise!" exists all over the world (ok, maybe less so in Russia or China).
