|
|
|
Batman: really curious what the flat earth tube are saying about these pics.
It'll be the usual cries of "fake" with the added bonus of now being able to scream "AI". Nothing here to be curious about at all.
gzt: More toilet problems. Frozen urine line solved by rotating the capsule to face the sun:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/04/science/artemis-2-toilet-malfunction
Urine is flushed into space. Turds are compacted and return to Earth with the capsule. I wonder why.
Ballast?
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Does anyone know why they needed 4 people in there? By the sound of they just needed a pilot and an IT tech to finish the Outlook Classic upgrade to Outlook New.
Batman:
really curious what the flat earth tube are saying about these pics. they have great imagination of invention those people.
![]()
I've been trying to work out this photo is - what that narrow connection is between the two land masses at 8 o'clock in the photo.
Thought it might be Bab-el-Mandeb in the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden where Djibouti is close to Yemen - but I'm not sure.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
eracode:
Batman:
really curious what the flat earth tube are saying about these pics. they have great imagination of invention those people.
![]()
I've been trying to work out this photo is - what that narrow connection is between the two land masses at 8 o'clock in the photo.
Thought it might be Bab-el-Mandeb in the Red Sea/Gulf of Aden where Djibouti is close to Yemen - but I'm not sure.
That'll be Spain and Africa.
Get your business seen overseas - Nexus Translations
Kookoo: Does anyone know why they needed 4 people in there? By the sound of they just needed a pilot and an IT tech to finish the Outlook Classic upgrade to Outlook New.
Dratsab:
Batman: really curious what the flat earth tube are saying about these pics.
It'll be the usual cries of "fake" with the added bonus of now being able to scream "AI". Nothing here to be curious about at all.
It's often worth explaining to people that given the state of film recording in the late 60's, it would have been harder to fake the moon landings than to actually go to the moon.
This explains it well.
Get your business seen overseas - Nexus Translations
Kookoo:
Does anyone know why they needed 4 people in there? By the sound of they just needed a pilot and an IT tech to finish the Outlook Classic upgrade to Outlook New.
So... a pilot and a CoPilot?
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Kookoo:
Does anyone know why they needed 4 people in there? By the sound of they just needed a pilot and an IT tech to finish the Outlook Classic upgrade to Outlook New.
they are the mechanics, the computer repair guy, firefighter team, the software engineer, satellite technician, rocket scientist, the doctor, your mother, toilet plumber, cleaner, everything
if something or someone breaks they fix it or die
this thing flies by gravity and has not enough power to get itself back
In the Apollo era communications were brisk and businesslike. In the Artemis Age they lactate sentiment and gooiness. Somewhere along the way, the Right Stuff has been evacuated into space!
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
In the Apollo era communications were brisk and businesslike. In the Artemis Age they lactate sentiment and gooiness. Somewhere along the way, the Right Stuff has been evacuated into space!
Graduates of the Star Fleet Academy?
I don't want to disparage in any way the achievements of the Artemis missions. I think they are an essential step in human evolution and exploration of the cosmos. They should have happened in the 1970s. But I just can't see the point of the 'crewed' journey of Artemis II. I don't see what they are doing that couldn't be done with the mannikins of Artemis I. They are passengers, not astronauts, along for a fun and very expensive ride. It is kind of pathetic the way NASA commentators keep trying to justify their presence by insisting they are doing real science by looking at the moon. They are not. They are doing group hugs and singing kumbaya. These are not the no-nonsense astronauts I remember from the 1960s.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
I don't want to disparage in any way the achievements of the Artemis missions. I think they are an essential step in human evolution and exploration of the cosmos. They should have happened in the 1970s. But I just can't see the point of the 'crewed' journey of Artemis II. I don't see what they are doing that couldn't be done with the mannikins of Artemis I. They are passengers, not astronauts, along for a fun and very expensive ride. It is kind of pathetic the way NASA commentators keep trying to justify their presence by insisting they are doing real science by looking at the moon. They are not. They are doing group hugs and singing kumbaya. These are not the no-nonsense astronauts I remember from the 1960s.
you realise its testing the life support, habitability, communications etc etc for future launches/missions
Jase2985:
you realise its testing the life support, habitability, communications etc etc for future launches/missions
Sure, but that can be done with instruments. Or they can add a couple monkeys again. The human cargo is just that: cargo.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
|
|
|