Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


stevenz

2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


#109148 13-Sep-2012 12:41
Send private message

Now this sounds intriguing. An audio codec that is suitable for virtually all purposes and is royalty free.

http://opus-codec.org/

Support is already in the current build of Firefox, amongst other apps. Sounds promising.

  • Bit-rates from 6 kb/s to 510 kb/s
  • Sampling rates from 8 kHz (narrowband) to 48 kHz (fullband)
  • Frame sizes from 2.5 ms to 60 ms
  • Support for both constant bit-rate (CBR) and variable bit-rate (VBR)
  • Audio bandwidth from narrowband to full-band
  • Support for speech and music
  • Support for mono and stereo
  • Support for up to 255 channels (multistream frames)
  • Dynamically adjustable bitrate, audio bandwidth, and frame size
  • Good loss robustness and packet loss concealment (PLC)
  • Floating point and fixed-point implementation

In a similar vein to OGG but seems a bit more versatile, maybe it'll catch on more.




Create new topic
billgates
4705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 671

Trusted

  #685520 13-Sep-2012 12:44
Send private message

Skype has written a easy to explain blog about it yesterday as well.

http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/09/skype_and_a_new_audio_codec.html




Do whatever you want to do man.

  



sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #685524 13-Sep-2012 12:53
Send private message

Now that does sound promising.

stevenz:
In a similar vein to OGG but seems a bit more versatile, maybe it'll catch on more.


Minor point; wasn't ogg the container format and vorbis the codec? :)




"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman


stevenz

2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  #685525 13-Sep-2012 12:55
Send private message

Pedant ;)






sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #685537 13-Sep-2012 13:03
Send private message




"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman


stevenz

2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  #685581 13-Sep-2012 13:43
Send private message

Speed is good too, tested encoding a 13.5 minute track and got:

22.3s to encode using LAME (v3.99, 64bit build)
17s to encode using Opus!

Using entirely default settings of course, so YMMV.

The resulting file played happily in Firefox.




blair003
557 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  #685585 13-Sep-2012 13:53
Send private message

I thought the main difference between Opus and Vorbis is that Opus was originally aimed at the low latency applications such as real time communication, voip etc where there is no real dominant codec.

Whereas vorbis was really going head to head with the likes of mp3, which is well entrenched.

As a side benefit, it turns out that Opus compares pretty well to mp3 and aac as well.. but I got the impression that Opus could for example be a replacement for the likes of G.722?

And a couple of companies have made patent claims, namely Qualcom and Huawei, but the Opus developers are adamant that the patents don't apply to their code (but that didn't really work out for samsung). And while the patent claims may be subject to FRAND, that could still mean there is a cost involved which would really suck.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
stevenz

2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  #685599 13-Sep-2012 14:13
Send private message

Hopefully they are using a genuine from-scratch algorithm. Now someone needs a comparable video codec so we can get rid of h.264.




dontpanic42
1574 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  #685642 13-Sep-2012 15:31
Send private message

stevenz: Hopefully they are using a genuine from-scratch algorithm. Now someone needs a comparable video codec so we can get rid of h.264.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_(video_compression_format)

I don't know the technical ins and outs of this video codec. I simply know that it exists, and that is it purportedly an open and royalty-free video compression format.

These two codecs inside an MKV or OGG container could potentially become the new open source standard.

1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152
Inactive user


  #685675 13-Sep-2012 16:17
Send private message


1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152
Inactive user


  #685679 13-Sep-2012 16:19
Send private message

x264 is already a completely open source implementation of h.264. h.265 development will begin soon, perhaps focus should shift to that :)

blair003
557 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  #685715 13-Sep-2012 17:04
Send private message

hahha.. that's the good thing about standards right -- there are so many to choose from.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.