Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


jarledb

Webhead
3319 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1983

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#141045 28-Feb-2014 00:48
Send private message

Must admit this story is cracking me up


British soldiers banned from training for snowy conditions at Norwegian base because health and safety rules deem it too COLD

...

British soldiers are being banned by health and safety rules from training at a military base in the Arctic circle - because it's too cold. Locals at the Allied Training Centre in Porsanger in Norway said they were stunned that while Norwegian troops were out in -25C weather, the Brits were being kept in the warm because of the army rules.


Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568384/British-soldiers-banned-training-snowy-conditions-Norwegian-base-health-safety-rules-deem-COLD.html


Apparently they are not allowed out if the temperature drops below -20 C. And NATO has classified temperatures below 8 degrees as "Cold winter training".

"Eight degrees in Porsanger means a fine autumn day" says The base commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel Trond Thomassen





Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6198

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #995926 28-Feb-2014 03:04
Send private message

Are they allowed to fight for real if it's below -20 C, as in a war? If not, this could be a breakthrough for world peace. Great to see the possibility of unionism in the military. "Call off the attack - it's too cold/hot/muddy/dangerous/dusty ...".




Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.




MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #995956 28-Feb-2014 06:54
Send private message

Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Batman
Mad Scientist
30012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #995969 28-Feb-2014 07:56
Send private message

I'd imagine their bodies/bits/lungs/etc could freeze and frozen tissue I imagine can't be too good for soldiers?

Nevermind NZ soliders - Ever wondered why Hilter lost? yeah lost most of his army trying to do just that - attack a frozen country



jeffnz
2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #995974 28-Feb-2014 08:03
Send private message

KiwiNZ: Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.


just curious but when and where was that




Galaxy S10

 

Garmin  Fenix 5




wakaridnnz
226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13


  #995997 28-Feb-2014 08:33

jeffnz:
KiwiNZ: Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.


just curious but when and where was that


Mt Ruapehu August 13 1990

jeffnz
2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #996003 28-Feb-2014 08:41
Send private message

wakaridnnz:
jeffnz:
KiwiNZ: Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.


just curious but when and where was that


Mt Ruapehu August 13 1990


ok thanks yes I recall that but it wasn't a training exercise it was the adventurous training centre course so a bit different in that respect.




Galaxy S10

 

Garmin  Fenix 5




 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #996017 28-Feb-2014 08:50
Send private message

I asked my son about this and he agrees with their policy up to a point. For normal exercises and training the risk is way too high. However pre-deployment training for a unit being deployed to a region needs to experience and learn how to keep judgement and cognitive thinking at its highest in adverse conditions therefore it would be appropriate for pre-deployment. Also equipment needs to be checked, tested and calibrated in those conditions.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #996031 28-Feb-2014 08:56
Send private message

jeffnz:
wakaridnnz:
jeffnz:
KiwiNZ: Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.


just curious but when and where was that


Mt Ruapehu August 13 1990


ok thanks yes I recall that but it wasn't a training exercise it was the adventurous training centre course so a bit different in that respect.


It was an Army Training exercise, my Nephew was to go on it but injured himself on the assault course two days prior, it still haunts him




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Klipspringer
2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  #996033 28-Feb-2014 08:57
Send private message

This is ridiculous.

MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #996037 28-Feb-2014 09:03
Send private message

Klipspringer: This is ridiculous.


disagree

for the record my family military involvement is as follows...

Father, WW2,
two uncles NZ Army,
Father in law British Army,
Uncle NZ Navy,
Uncle RNZAF,
two sons NZArmy,
Four Nephews NZ Army,
one Niece NZ Army,
Brother in law NZ Army,
Sister in law Australian Army,
Sons father in law  NZ Army








Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Buzz Bumble
332 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 56
Inactive user


  #996046 28-Feb-2014 09:15
Send private message


eracode: Are they allowed to fight for real if it's below -20 C, as in a war? If not, this could be a breakthrough for world peace. Great to see the possibility of unionism in the military. "Call off the attack - it's too cold/hot/muddy/dangerous/dusty ...".


"Sergeant Major, it's -19.5degrees. Time to tuck 'em all up in beddy-byes with a nice electric blanket and a cup of hot coca." ;-)

Of course, you'll now get all the planet's morons planning their terrorist attacks precisely when it is "too cold/hot/...".

HP

 
 
 
 

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
old3eyes
9158 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1364

Subscriber

  #996065 28-Feb-2014 09:22
Send private message

So as the Russians advance into Western Europe in the winter the EU decides it's too cold to fight so they wave the white flag due to OSH concerns. Churchill would turn in his grave...




Regards,

Old3eyes


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #996070 28-Feb-2014 09:26
Send private message

old3eyes: So as the Russians advance into Western Europe in the winter the EU decides it's too cold to fight so they wave the white flag due to OSH concerns. Churchill would turn in his grave...


There is a big difference between Training, Pre-deployment Training, Special Ops Training and combat.  Losing military personnel during normal training makes no sense what so ever.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


jeffnz
2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #996137 28-Feb-2014 10:08
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
jeffnz:
wakaridnnz:
jeffnz:
KiwiNZ: Putting needless risk on defence force personnel for training is pointless. NZ lost a group from 1st Battalion doing just that.


just curious but when and where was that


Mt Ruapehu August 13 1990


ok thanks yes I recall that but it wasn't a training exercise it was the adventurous training centre course so a bit different in that respect.


It was an Army Training exercise, my Nephew was to go on it but injured himself on the assault course two days prior, it still haunts him


I have a bit of experience to and was a serving Officer when this happened and know one of the instructors that was involved. It wasn't a training exercise as in  what the op is posting about as  it wasn't a unit it was people from units that do these courses.

I do agree about adverse conditions and what is the real goal needing to be achieved, if you don't have the right gear or training it is a recipe for disaster.






Galaxy S10

 

Garmin  Fenix 5




jeffnz
2870 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 666

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #996142 28-Feb-2014 10:09
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
Klipspringer: This is ridiculous.


disagree

for the record my family military involvement is as follows...

Father, WW2,
two uncles NZ Army,
Father in law British Army,
Uncle NZ Navy,
Uncle RNZAF,
two sons NZArmy,
Four Nephews NZ Army,
one Niece NZ Army,
Brother in law NZ Army,
Sister in law Australian Army,
Sons father in law  NZ Army






thats really good but fail to see that it makes you an expert as you are only getting this info third hand and someones opinion.




Galaxy S10

 

Garmin  Fenix 5




 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.