Consumer Guarantee Act on faulty repair??

Forums › Off topic › Consumer Guarantee Act on faulty repair??

MagicSquirrel

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5

#182433 15-Oct-2015 16:03

Alternator in our car failed about six months ago and we got it repaired by local dealer.
Dealer organised a replacement part from some company in AKL that sells refurbished alternators.
Alternator came with 12 month warranty.

Now replacement alternator packed up too and we took the car back to same garage.
I just got a call saying that alternator is free but we have to pay for labor cost which in this case is about $250 because "alternator warranty was provided by other company"

This doesn't sound quite right to me?? I do not have any contract with this 3rd party who provided refurbished alternator.
Is dealer just trying to pick my pockets or do they actually have rights to charge the labor from me under CGA?

1 | 2 | 3

11924 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1407330 15-Oct-2015 16:12

He is trying it on. You are correct that as your dealer supplied the alternator he is responsible for replacing it if it failed.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018

#1407342 15-Oct-2015 16:30

$250 sounds like a very steep labour cost to replace an alternator. I'd have expected perhaps 1 hour labour maximum, unless it's extraordinarily complicated to get access to it (possible but unlikely).
But anyway, you shouldn't be paying anything at all.

MagicSquirrel

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5

#1407344 15-Oct-2015 16:36

Fred99: $250 sounds like a very steep labour cost to replace an alternator. I'd have expected perhaps 1 hour labour maximum, unless it's extraordinarily complicated to get access to it (possible but unlikely).

It actually is extraordinary complicated and requires removing bumper, one headlamp housing, power steering pump bolts etc. and wiggling alternator out from underneath the car :)

Goosey

3014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 867

Subscriber

#1407345 15-Oct-2015 16:37

When my VW alternator packed up, it was replaced and a 12 month warranty for part only and I was informed this at the time. All labour cost was to be mine if it did packed up within 12 months, which was fair sounding to me. Depending on the car, an alternator can be tricky to get out and in again (i.e. radiators, hoses, belts, other things crammed in the way of access).

Was there any small print on the invoice pointing out that warranty was for parts only?

MikeB4

MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#1407347 15-Oct-2015 16:41

MagicSquirrel:
Fred99: $250 sounds like a very steep labour cost to replace an alternator. I'd have expected perhaps 1 hour labour maximum, unless it's extraordinarily complicated to get access to it (possible but unlikely).

It actually is extraordinary complicated and requires removing bumper, one headlamp housing, power steering pump bolts etc. and wiggling alternator out from underneath the car :)

That is a lot of work, $250 does not sound unreasonable

Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.

ubergeeknz

3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

Trusted

Vocus

#1407349 15-Oct-2015 16:50

MagicSquirrel:
Fred99: $250 sounds like a very steep labour cost to replace an alternator. I'd have expected perhaps 1 hour labour maximum, unless it's extraordinarily complicated to get access to it (possible but unlikely).

It actually is extraordinary complicated and requires removing bumper, one headlamp housing, power steering pump bolts etc. and wiggling alternator out from underneath the car :)

I thought mine was difficult and I only had to undo one engine mount and jack the engine a bit to get clearance

AliExpress

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).

MagicSquirrel

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5

#1407350 15-Oct-2015 16:50

MikeB4:
That is a lot of work, $250 does not sound unreasonable

Yep, I agree with that, and the amount in this case is irrelevant.
I'm interested in the legal side of charging labor fees.

Is repair considered as service or combination of goods & service?

wellygary

8810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5287

#1407351 15-Oct-2015 16:57

MagicSquirrel:
MikeB4:
That is a lot of work, $250 does not sound unreasonable

Yep, I agree with that, and the amount in this case is irrelevant.
I'm interested in the legal side of charging labor fees. Is repair considered as service or combination of goods & service?

A warranty can be "parts only" but I think it needs to be specified, best check the fine print...

Handle9

11924 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1407352 15-Oct-2015 16:57

MagicSquirrel:
MikeB4:
That is a lot of work, $250 does not sound unreasonable

Yep, I agree with that, and the amount in this case is irrelevant.
I'm interested in the legal side of charging labor fees. Is repair considered as service or combination of goods & service?

The labour cost is a consequential loss caused by the defective alternator, therefore is considered part of the supplied solution. The only exceptions would be if you free issued them the alternator to fit, or if the alternator was replaced under warranty and the original 12 month warranty had expired. Below has some good detail.

https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/consumer-guarantees-act

ubergeeknz

3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

Trusted

Vocus

#1407354 15-Oct-2015 17:03

wellygary:
MagicSquirrel:
MikeB4:
That is a lot of work, $250 does not sound unreasonable

Yep, I agree with that, and the amount in this case is irrelevant.
I'm interested in the legal side of charging labor fees. Is repair considered as service or combination of goods & service?

A warranty can be "parts only" but I think it needs to be specified, best check the fine print...

What's written in the warranty does not matter one jot. One cannot contract out of one's obligations under the CGA.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018

#1407365 15-Oct-2015 17:36

MagicSquirrel:
Fred99: $250 sounds like a very steep labour cost to replace an alternator. I'd have expected perhaps 1 hour labour maximum, unless it's extraordinarily complicated to get access to it (possible but unlikely).

It actually is extraordinary complicated and requires removing bumper, one headlamp housing, power steering pump bolts etc. and wiggling alternator out from underneath the car :)

What kind of car?
<for future reference as something to avoid>

Quic Broadband

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.

surfisup1000

5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159

#1407390 15-Oct-2015 18:22

Fred99:
What kind of car?
<for future reference as something to avoid>

Given that every model of car in the world will have suffered a mechanical issue from time to time I'm guessing your cars-to-avoid list will be rather lengthy.

Regardless, the dealer must pay for repairs... outrageous yet common what they are trying to do to you.

You can either pay up and make life easy...

Or, argue and fight (and inevitably win as the dealer is in the wrong) which might end up in the disputes tribunal though.

MagicSquirrel

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5

#1407393 15-Oct-2015 18:29

Fred99:

What kind of car?
<for future reference as something to avoid>

Ford Ka. Not sure if that even classifies as 'a car' :)

surfisup1000

5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159

#1407395 15-Oct-2015 18:29

Handle9:
The labour cost is a consequential loss caused by the defective alternator

The CGA does not really define the term 'repairs', but most normal people would assume that repairs includes both parts and labour.

The labour is not really a consequential loss. Consequential loss is the damage or loss done to other things due to the failure in question. eg, if i bought a new car tire which burst prematurely causing me to destroy a fence then the fence repairs would be considered consequential loss.

surfisup1000

5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159

#1407396 15-Oct-2015 18:30

MagicSquirrel:
Fred99:

What kind of car?
<for future reference as something to avoid>

Ford Ka. Not sure if that even classifies as 'a car' :)

Beats a smart car ha ha.

1 | 2 | 3