Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


1267 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 22


Topic # 185749 3-Dec-2015 18:36
Send private message



Where IJK and LMN are 3-digit whole numbers? Got me stumped.

Create new topic
572 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 82

Trusted

  Reply # 1440083 3-Dec-2015 18:49
Send private message

355 / 113



1267 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 22


  Reply # 1440084 3-Dec-2015 18:50
Send private message

Brilliant !

572 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 82

Trusted

  Reply # 1440085 3-Dec-2015 18:53
Send private message

no worries, i sort of guess, i started with 111 and times it by 3.141592 and then worked towards a number that match, so i got it in three goes. Someone out there will have the right method to doing it.

5117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1644


  Reply # 1440090 3-Dec-2015 19:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

In that notation, wouldn't IJK = I*J*K?

And is that pi or pi*3.141592? (approx pi squared)

EDIT: Or are they substituting 3.141592 for pi?

gzt

10191 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1562


  Reply # 1440104 3-Dec-2015 19:16
2 people support this post
Send private message

Pi is an irrational number. Ie; cannot be expressed as a ratio. Therefore if the answer is Pi the equation is false.



1267 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 22


  Reply # 1440108 3-Dec-2015 19:19
One person supports this post
Send private message

I think they are just 3-digit numbers and the expression for pi is an approximation, the answer given seems to fit in with the rest of the puzzle.

2852 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 798

Subscriber

  Reply # 1440110 3-Dec-2015 19:22
Send private message

I might have assumed that "IJK" (and LMN) implies that these integers are all different from each other - but obviously not. Otherwise 355 could be IJJ and 113 could be KKL?

But I have just read RunningMan's post and like that approach more.

2853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 491


  Reply # 1440174 3-Dec-2015 21:34
Send private message

Reading Wiki it would seem 355/113 (3.141592920) was a figure derived by a Chinese mathematician (Zu Chongzhi) in 480 AD and was for the next 800 years the most accurate calculation of pi.  I suspect those that are mathematicians probably know this number.

I don't know there is any ready and rough method to work the answer in the example out other than by trial and error.

Fabian, what made you choose 111 as a starting point.






Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.