Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




2876 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 503


Topic # 189063 15-Dec-2015 21:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

I don't know about you but I'm always sceptical about the type of talk fests we've just witnessed in Paris about the climate change accord.

I came across this blog today.  It has some frightening figures.  

The cost of the agreement by 2030 will be 1-2 trillion annually. 

The agreed carbon emission reductions are less that 1% of what's actually required to keep temperature rises below 2 degrees.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-have-treaty-what-cost-bjorn-lomborg 

It all seems to be a very expensive waste of time to me.





Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Mad Scientist
19315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2525

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1451203 15-Dec-2015 22:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

I think there are a few separate issues that some professional protesters lump together and say that CO2 is killing the earth. In reality they are very distinct entities

1. Non degradable rubbish. The more of this crap that is generated, the larger your dumping ground needs to be. And it never degrades! IMHO = bad

2. Fossil fuel and polution. You just need to look at urban China. Complete loss of night-day. Smog everywhere. Surely if we keep burning crap we will all soon live in a fog of smog. IMHO = bad

3. CO2 and climate change. There are contrasting arguments about whether one causes the other or are actually independant beasts. I have no idea. These guys are pretty certain though.




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


Mad Scientist
19315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2525

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1451204 15-Dec-2015 22:08
Send private message

oh and 4. Politics, Greenpeace, and the rest of the world. One cares about votes and power. One will protest just about anything, and try to crucify non conformists. The rest just struggle on to make ends meet.




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


 
 
 
 




2876 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 503


  Reply # 1451220 15-Dec-2015 22:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

joker97: I think there are a few separate issues that some professional protesters lump together and say that CO2 is killing the earth. In reality they are very distinct entities

1. Non degradable rubbish. The more of this crap that is generated, the larger your dumping ground needs to be. And it never degrades! IMHO = bad

2. Fossil fuel and polution. You just need to look at urban China. Complete loss of night-day. Smog everywhere. Surely if we keep burning crap we will all soon live in a fog of smog. IMHO = bad

3. CO2 and climate change. There are contrasting arguments about whether one causes the other or are actually independant beasts. I have no idea. These guys are pretty certain though.


I see one of "Those Guys" is the writer of the blog I linked.

I'm not convinced CO2 emissions are the root cause of climate change.  It's a proven fact the earth has been heating and cooling for 1000's of years. having said that I don't think we should just ignore pollution either.

As for Greenpeace they're just eco terrorists. They're not peaceful at all.




Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


1528 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 790


  Reply # 1451221 15-Dec-2015 22:53
2 people support this post
Send private message

A lot of what has been agreed, and demanded by the greenies, is just socialism on a global scale - redistribution of wealth from successful countries to struggling ones.

It must just be pure coincidence that many greenies used to be overt socialists and turned green when red went out of fashion

And the truly effective way of saving earth's resources - limiting global population growth - mustn't be mentioned

12127 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3947

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1451231 15-Dec-2015 23:39
4 people support this post
Send private message

Personally I think it is bunk. If the world never warmed, Europe would still be under several kilometres of ice.

 

 

There is money being made out of this and that is the reason why it is being blamed on humans and not on the sun, planetary movement, general natural climate change and so on.





UHD

656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 303
Inactive user


  Reply # 1451244 16-Dec-2015 01:18
Send private message

joker97: I think there are a few separate issues that some professional protesters lump together and say that CO2 is killing the earth. In reality they are very distinct entities

1. Non degradable rubbish. The more of this crap that is generated, the larger your dumping ground needs to be. And it never degrades! IMHO = bad

2. Fossil fuel and polution. You just need to look at urban China. Complete loss of night-day. Smog everywhere. Surely if we keep burning crap we will all soon live in a fog of smog. IMHO = bad

3. CO2 and climate change. There are contrasting arguments about whether one causes the other or are actually independant beasts. I have no idea. These guys are pretty certain though.


1. Yes. Yes it does degrade.

2. The difference between China and the rest of the western world is nearly a billion people and some semblance of emissions standards.



13549 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1451259 16-Dec-2015 06:48
Send private message

Unless the big industrial nations fully participate it will fail. Anything NZ does without their full commitment would be like fighting a forest fire with cups of water.

The time for procrastination and denial is past.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 




2876 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 503


  Reply # 1451326 16-Dec-2015 09:23
2 people support this post
Send private message

MikeB4: Unless the big industrial nations fully participate it will fail. Anything NZ does without their full commitment would be like fighting a forest fire with cups of water.

The time for procrastination and denial is past.


So are you saying climate change is man made? I don't agree with that.

Anything NZ does will be a hugely expensive waste of time.




Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


13549 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1451327 16-Dec-2015 09:27
One person supports this post
Send private message

Technofreak:
MikeB4: Unless the big industrial nations fully participate it will fail. Anything NZ does without their full commitment would be like fighting a forest fire with cups of water.

The time for procrastination and denial is past.


So are you saying climate change is man made? I don't agree with that.

Anything NZ does will be a hugely expensive waste of time.


There is a factor of natural climate swing however the evidence showing that climate change has been dramatically exacerbated and accelerated by man is extensive and compelling. On its own NZ can not do much but as part of a collective effort
we can be part of the solution, doing nothing will be vastly more costly.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


13810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2508

Trusted

  Reply # 1451335 16-Dec-2015 09:41
Send private message

joker97: I think there are a few separate issues that some professional protesters lump together and say that CO2 is killing the earth. In reality they are very distinct entities

1. Non degradable rubbish. The more of this crap that is generated, the larger your dumping ground needs to be. And it never degrades! IMHO = bad

2. Fossil fuel and polution. You just need to look at urban China. Complete loss of night-day. Smog everywhere. Surely if we keep burning crap we will all soon live in a fog of smog. IMHO = bad

3. CO2 and climate change. There are contrasting arguments about whether one causes the other or are actually independant beasts. I have no idea. These guys are pretty certain though.


Ive read and watched many docos on climate change, for and against. The difference with the past is that is natural, and is more to do with coolling than heating. heating and cooling cycles occur and are natural. When you throw on a human created hearting effect, i.e. the spike from the Industrial Revolution thats a different manner. We are heating the atmosphere, and insulating it, and we are inputting a global cooling into the atmosphere as well, smoke particles. If we emitted gas, CFC, CO2, but no smoke we would be circa 2 degrees worse off. (smoke particles are large and block sunlight, and the moisture they hold is much larger and allow more diffusing of sunlight)

But I can see that this thread will go to the "it is real" and to the "it is rubbish" camps!

13810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2508

Trusted

  Reply # 1451341 16-Dec-2015 09:47
Send private message

Technofreak:
joker97: I think there are a few separate issues that some professional protesters lump together and say that CO2 is killing the earth. In reality they are very distinct entities

1. Non degradable rubbish. The more of this crap that is generated, the larger your dumping ground needs to be. And it never degrades! IMHO = bad

2. Fossil fuel and polution. You just need to look at urban China. Complete loss of night-day. Smog everywhere. Surely if we keep burning crap we will all soon live in a fog of smog. IMHO = bad

3. CO2 and climate change. There are contrasting arguments about whether one causes the other or are actually independant beasts. I have no idea. These guys are pretty certain though.


I see one of "Those Guys" is the writer of the blog I linked.

I'm not convinced CO2 emissions are the root cause of climate change.  It's a proven fact the earth has been heating and cooling for 1000's of years. having said that I don't think we should just ignore pollution either.

As for Greenpeace they're just eco terrorists. They're not peaceful at all.


I agree re Greenpeace

Heating and coolling, yes its natural, but we add our ingredients as well, thats not natural. Siberia has held massive methane under the tundra. Many areas have warmed there to 0 degrees, and some are leaking methane. Thats massive. Cows are a big issue. Removing vegeation, Amazon is a big deal, that area is huge in adding oxygen and removing CO2 as do all plants. When it gets away, its too late to reverse it.



2876 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 503


  Reply # 1451345 16-Dec-2015 09:57
Send private message

One of the age old problems is the Lies, Damn Lie and Statistics.

Unfortunately I think both sides of the story are using Statistics to tell "lies".

One real problem I have is whether or not global warming is worsened by human influence there seems to be plenty of evidence to show the efforts being agreed to at meetings like the one in Paris will have virtually no effect but have significant cost. In the short term the money would be better spent on mitigating the effects rather than trying to stop the change. Money also needs to be spent on developing new technology

Another question needs to be asked.  Is it actually possible to reduce the emissions enough to achieve the temperature reduction goals? Right now I'd say No, without the whole world returning to pre steam boat days style of living. Is that likely to happen? New technology may change this.




Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


536 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 154


  Reply # 1451351 16-Dec-2015 10:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

shk292: And the truly effective way of saving earth's resources - limiting global population growth - mustn't be mentioned


Here is the root of the problem! We are far beyond the global population that our planets resources can viably sustain. 

And with global population likely to reach 9-10 billion by 2050, demand for energy, food and water are only going to increase.

Wars over food and water will almost certainly happen within our lifetime....  frown



13549 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1451352 16-Dec-2015 10:06
Send private message

Technofreak: One of the age old problems is the Lies, Damn Lie and Statistics.

Unfortunately I think both sides of the story are using Statistics to tell "lies".

One real problem I have is whether or not global warming is worsened by human influence there seems to be plenty of evidence to show the efforts being agreed to at meetings like the one in Paris will have virtually no effect but have significant cost. In the short term the money would be better spent on mitigating the effects rather than trying to stop the change. Money also needs to be spent on developing new technology

Another question needs to be asked.  Is it actually possible to reduce the emissions enough to achieve the temperature reduction goals? Right now I'd say No, without the whole world returning to pre steam boat days style of living. Is that likely to happen? New technology may change this.


Your questions are best directed at climate scientists.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


13549 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1451355 16-Dec-2015 10:10
Send private message

The Earth has not yet reached a tipping point, but that is not far off and the window of opportunity is closing fast. Once past the tipping point then we are going to be along for the ride and any actions then will be akin to King Cnut




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.