Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


12517 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2212

Trusted

Topic # 238204 6-Jul-2018 18:21
Send private message quote this post

I didnt put this in Politics so it gets wider coverage.

 

To me its merit, end of story, close the thread please!  I dont even know why this is an issue.

 

Currently One News says its 45% someone said it needs to be 50%, I just caught the end off the clip.

 

Why does it need to be 50%? I think 45% is great. Most males are eligible. Many females have children, so the 50% of females gets reduced, so by my off the cuff calculations, the gals are doing really well. 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
2618 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 630


  Reply # 2050770 6-Jul-2018 18:40
10 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

it shouldn't matter as long as the best person has the job.





Common sense is not as common as you think.




12517 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2212

Trusted

  Reply # 2050777 6-Jul-2018 18:58
Send private message quote this post

vexxxboy:

 

it shouldn't matter as long as the best person has the job.

 

 

Agree, but the history says otherwise. Its all about equality apparently. Much like when South Africa decided it needs x% of black players. So for them it was about equality and not about sport. I guess these thing fill space in papers and websites, and give activists something to do.


'That VDSL Cat'
8091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1688

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 2050794 6-Jul-2018 19:15
4 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

i support that there should be equality.

 

 

 

However, i don't support it at the expense of everything else in order to reach a metric. 





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


262 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 50


  Reply # 2050822 6-Jul-2018 20:26
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Is this is about Julie Anne Genters rabid comments about directors and boards?

 

Two things, you have equal opportunity and equal outcomes. Equal opportunity is where everyone gets a fair crack at the job - no matter gender/race/age/etc, and whomever best fits the role gets it. Equal outcomes is where you force a proportion of people - where someone may be hired because of their sex rather than their capabilities/merit. We want equal opportunity - not equal outcomes. Equal outcomes is essentially a form of sexism/racism etc.

 

The second problem we have is NZ has a lot of diverse companies, we have:

 

 - 362,000 companies with zero employees. So the directors of these companies are probably a single owner /+ accountant

 

 - there are 140,000 with less than 20 employees. So once again likely to be owner/directors

 

So screaming that we need more company directors and boards to be 50% female just doesn't work as a lot of them are owner/operator directors. Unless we have a massive wave of women starting their own businesses this isn't going to change.

 

But I suppose this kind of ignorance is to be expected by some young greenie yank who wasn't actually representing an electorate nor voted in by an electorate. 


gzt

9922 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1492


  Reply # 2050828 6-Jul-2018 20:39
Send private message quote this post

Looks like a new policy tdgeek saw on the one news today:

Link to policy announcement and stats data:

http://women.govt.nz/news/more-women-public-boards

2079 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 217

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2050865 6-Jul-2018 22:25
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Everything should be based on merit.

Personally in my job I couldn’t care less if my supervisor is a male or female. As long as they are the best person for the job then gender is irrelevant.

Meeting a gender based target does not necessarily equate with competence or capability.




MacBook Pro 13" w/ Touch Bar (Early 2017) | iPad Pro 10.5 Wi-Fi 128GB (Space Grey) | iPhone 8 Plus 64GB (Product RED) | HomePod (Space Grey) | Apple TV 4K | Apple TV (4th Generation) | Apple Watch Series 3 42mm (Space Grey)

17246 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4927

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2050875 6-Jul-2018 22:49
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I find this drive to create outcomes based on any one factor to equality sickening. 

 

I support anyone being able to put their name forward for a job, man women or otherwise. I 100% only support hiring the best person for the job. I don't care about gender for that.

 

I consider it madness to even consider hiring a particular gender for a particular role, gender shouldn't be a factor. 


450 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 281


  Reply # 2050904 7-Jul-2018 01:16
Send private message quote this post

vulcannz:

 

So screaming that we need more company directors and boards to be 50% female just doesn't work as a lot of them are owner/operator directors. Unless we have a massive wave of women starting their own businesses this isn't going to change.

 

I haven't looked into the detail around this, but I'm guessing Julie Anne Genter is referring to something like listed companies, rather than every company.

 

That said, I tend to agree with you. Especially when J.A.G. posts idiotic stuff like this:

 


6659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3414


  Reply # 2050963 7-Jul-2018 09:29
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Journeyman:

 

That said, I tend to agree with you. Especially when J.A.G. posts idiotic stuff like this:

 

 

What's idiotic about that?

 

It's only twitter - and it's actually a damned good question.  Why the hell - when having a clean-out - did he end up following only men on twitter?

 

Edit to say hahahaha.

 

Sam had stated that his method to clean out people he followed was to unfollow anybody who tweeted anything.  Based on gender difference in use of social media, women tended to self select themselves out at a faster rate than men - knock me down with a feather.  I'm not signed up to twitter, only facebook.  With a few exceptions, most of my male facebook friends seldom post anything, if I used Sam's method to cull my friend list, I think the same would happen.  In the end I'd be left friends with a few male friends who don't seem to post anything at all, and some old fake accounts people set up for their now long dead cats etc.


1684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 811


  Reply # 2050966 7-Jul-2018 09:36
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

Journeyman:

 

That said, I tend to agree with you. Especially when J.A.G. posts idiotic stuff like this:

 

 

What's idiotic about that?

 

It's only twitter - and it's actually a damned good question.  Why the hell - when having a clean-out - did he end up following only men on twitter?

 

 

 

 

Stop trolling Fred.

 

It is nobodies business as to who he follows on twitter. Maybe he also needs to have equal numbers of coffees with women as he does men. Clearly JAG is a man hater who will stop at nothing to push her own very skewed agenda. IMO having rules to ensure women get at least 50% of everything is clearly bias and should be illegal.  Rules should be to ensure the best person gets the job throughout out public service.


6659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3414


  Reply # 2050969 7-Jul-2018 09:46
Send private message quote this post

Pumpedd:

 

It is nobodies business as to who he follows on twitter. 

 

 

You're wrong there.  It's public information that people choose to make available to the public.  If you don't like how that's being used - then do what Sam has done.

 

See my edit above - there's probably a very simple explanation.  If there's gender imbalance as observed, asking why is a valid question.  Even the probable answer (in that case possibly that women post more frequently on social media) kind of begs further question "why" - even if the answer doesn't matter to you.


Glurp
7560 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3536

Subscriber

  Reply # 2050982 7-Jul-2018 10:23
6 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

I believe the argument about merit is a fake one, used to justify current practice. Females have been, and still are, discriminated against throughout their lives in a variety of ways. This is changing but people today are still affected by the practices of yesterday. The result is that there are always more men than women with the best CVs because men are given better opportunities to develop their careers and women have to be extra capable or extra lucky to reach the same levels. 'Merit' can be assessed in different ways. The current ones disadvantage women. It is a fake  argument.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 811


  Reply # 2051000 7-Jul-2018 11:28
5 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

I believe the argument about merit is a fake one, used to justify current practice. Females have been, and still are, discriminated against throughout their lives in a variety of ways. This is changing but people today are still affected by the practices of yesterday. The result is that there are always more men than women with the best CVs because men are given better opportunities to develop their careers and women have to be extra capable or extra lucky to reach the same levels. 'Merit' can be assessed in different ways. The current ones disadvantage women. It is a fake  argument.

 

 

 

 

That is true as to history..no doubt there. It is more about the evolution of humans than anything else. Now I believe men are being discriminated against very clearly. A lot of public service jobs now must be women by decree. Public Servant CEO's have a mandate to appoint women, but no mandate to appoint men. This is clearly discrimination.

 

I strongly agree to equality, but not at any cost.


Glurp
7560 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3536

Subscriber

  Reply # 2051006 7-Jul-2018 11:36
Send private message quote this post

I agree that some men are being discriminated against in some situations. I think the argument for this is that it is a temporary measure to compensate for past discrimination against women, and once a fair balance is achieved it will no longer be necessary. I don't know if this is a good idea. It doesn't feel right to me. But I do think something has to be done to bring women to a genuinely equal footing with men, and if this is what it takes, then maybe it is a necessary evil.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 811


  Reply # 2051009 7-Jul-2018 11:50
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

Pumpedd:

 

It is nobodies business as to who he follows on twitter. 

 

 

You're wrong there.  It's public information that people choose to make available to the public.  If you don't like how that's being used - then do what Sam has done.

 

See my edit above - there's probably a very simple explanation.  If there's gender imbalance as observed, asking why is a valid question.  Even the probable answer (in that case possibly that women post more frequently on social media) kind of begs further question "why" - even if the answer doesn't matter to you.

 

 

Whether or not information is available to be seen publicly or not is irrelevant in this case. It is still not a Ministers role to judge on how many followers are what sex. It is typical of what is happening this generation. It is still nobodies business but Morgans on what sex his followees are. This is what is wrong with society these days. We judge a person on a small piece of irrelevant information that actually says nothing about the person.

 

Maybe we should reverse the same sex relationships Acts, as it is not right not to have a male and a female in that role.


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.