|
|
|
Psilan: Doesn't look as terrible from those photos. Lots of excessive cabling.
What the hell is going on next to your green singlet?
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Vladmax:
Thanks for your details explanation dude, appreciate the info, very interesting. The connection is stable and is faster then 90% of New Zealand according to Speedtest.Net, so I'm happy with it and don't really want to start fiddling with firmwares and other tweaks just to push it 2-4mbsp further. I might try to get it re-synced at higher rate one day though, but can't be bothered at the moment. All I need to do online goes very well and perfectly fast.
SamF: The capacitor type things are a line testing devices which telecom use for line checks. I don't know if they affect VDSL or not but they are not essential and not all lines have them. I took mine out and there were no adverse effects. My advice would be to remove them.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
eXDee: Wow. That's some of the worst wiring i've ever seen for a job. I'd wager with a bit of instruction from people on here, you yourself could probably do far better.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
SamF: The capacitor type things are a line testing devices which telecom use for line checks. I don't know if they affect VDSL or not but they are not essential and not all lines have them. I took mine out and there were no adverse effects. My advice would be to remove them.
Bme 1 Port 1 Excessive Severe Error (ESE) Failure detected
[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposPortStop cmdtag 0 status: IN PROGRESS
cpe> [dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposPortStop cmdtag 0 status: COMPLETE
cpe> VDSL Link is Down
local event log from BME 1
Sep 25 04:59:18 chronyd[1870]: Source 80.190.97.205 offline
Sep 25 04:59:18 chronyd[1870]: Source 195.5.136.1 offline
Sep 25 04:59:18 chronyd[1870]: Source 188.39.98.165 offline
Sep 25 04:59:18 chronyd[1870]: Source 131.234.137.24 offline
[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposPortStart cmdtag 0 status: IN PROGRESS
cpe> [AVM] hostTrafficThrottle action=1
[AVM] hostTrafficThrottle action=0
[AVM] hostTrafficThrottle action=1
Setting Framing mode to EFM
VDSL Link Training
[AVM] hostTrafficThrottle action=0
ipos idx: 8 present 1380078006s start 1380077960s diff 46s[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposPortStart cmdtag 0 status: COMPLETE
cpe> VDSL Link Established
[dsl_ikanos] showtime: ds rate 44872 us rate 10360, intlv ds 163 intlv us 37
Eoc Opcode = b9
b1p1 EocGetData: EocOpcode 185[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: IN PROGRESS
cpe> Eoc Opcode = ba
b1p1 EocGetData: EocOpcode 186[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: IN PROGRESS
cpe> Eoc Opcode = a8
b1p1 EocGetData: EocOpcode 168[dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: IN PROGRESS
cpe> [dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: COMPLETE
cpe>
VendorId:
b5 00 49 4b 4e 53 00 00 [ I K N S ]
Version-Num:
36 2e 37 2e 33 2e 32 49 4b 30 30 35 30 31 30 00
[ 6.7.3.2IK005010]
Serial-Num:
01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
cpe> [dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: COMPLETE
cpe> SNR Margin (SNRM-avg): 16.90 dB
SNR Margin (SNRMpb-0): 0.00 dB
SNR Margin (SNRMpb-1): 16.90 dB
SNR Margin (SNRMpb-2): 0.00 dB
SNR Margin (SNRMpb-3): 0.00 dB
SNR Margin (SNRMpb-4): 0.00 dB
cpe> [dsl_ikanos] b1p1 iposEocGetData cmdtag 0 status: COMPLETE
cpe> Attainable Net Data Rate (ATTNDR): 1328000 (bits/sec)
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
stevehodge:Vladmax:
Thanks for your details explanation dude, appreciate the info, very interesting. The connection is stable and is faster then 90% of New Zealand according to Speedtest.Net, so I'm happy with it and don't really want to start fiddling with firmwares and other tweaks just to push it 2-4mbsp further. I might try to get it re-synced at higher rate one day though, but can't be bothered at the moment. All I need to do online goes very well and perfectly fast.
There is nothing wrong with the speed, but that error rate is going to cause you problems I believe.
Vladmax:stevehodge:Vladmax:
Thanks for your details explanation dude, appreciate the info, very interesting. The connection is stable and is faster then 90% of New Zealand according to Speedtest.Net, so I'm happy with it and don't really want to start fiddling with firmwares and other tweaks just to push it 2-4mbsp further. I might try to get it re-synced at higher rate one day though, but can't be bothered at the moment. All I need to do online goes very well and perfectly fast.
There is nothing wrong with the speed, but that error rate is going to cause you problems I believe.
Not sure why but I think last graph I have posted was rubbish, as you could see that graph was stuck on 8db SNR while in the line stats the SNR was 13. Modem was powered down yesterday and have re-synced at 44.4 with SNR of 12, Latency: Fast and INP 0. Now graph shows only around 6 CRC errors per minute.
But what problems would you envisage with higher CRC error rate, say 15 or 20CRC per minute? And is there a significant difference between DLM1 & DLM2 ?
chevrolux: The tech really should have eliminated the tru-rip cable (the flat white cable).
It isn't the right impedance and will affect VDSL frequency's badly.
Again, a new cable (Cat 5e minimum) needs to be run directly from the ETP to where you want the modem. This is not me recommending, this is what Chorus are actually told and PAID to do. Yes it is peanuts but regardless, if a Chorus Quality Assurance guy checked this connection the tech would be made to fix it all up because it simply isn't up to spec.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Vladmax:
Not sure why but I think last graph I have posted was rubbish, as you could see that graph was stuck on 8db SNR while in the line stats the SNR was 13. Modem was powered down yesterday and have re-synced at 44.4 with SNR of 12, Latency: Fast and INP 0. Now graph shows only around 6 CRC errors per minute.
But what problems would you envisage with higher CRC error rate, say 15 or 20CRC per minute? And is there a significant difference between DLM1 & DLM2 ?
any idea how one pulls out a quality assurance guy? would love to have their comments on the workmanship lawl..
chevrolux:any idea how one pulls out a quality assurance guy? would love to have their comments on the workmanship lawl..
It's all random. And the sad thing is this job probably won't even get QA'd. The QA fellas are more keen on a tech's penmanship than his actual work. It sucks really.
Don't let this issue slide by, moan and moan until the tech returns.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
|
|
|