Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
crazed

484 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 26

Trusted

  #337675 3-Jun-2010 09:37
Send private message

Ragnor:
insane: I was going to tell you to have a read of johl's excetel blog to hopefully get some sort of idea of what NZ's larger ISPs would be like. Now his blog costs a $20 donation to view so this info will cost you.



Australian ISP Exetel
http://public.mrtg.exetel.com.au/bwsummary/ExetelBandwidthSummary.html
http://public.mrtg.exetel.com.au/bwsummary/total-supplier-bandwidth.html

UK ISP Plusnet
http://www.plus.net/support/network_performance/broadband_bandwidth_usage.shtml?supporta=networkpbroadbandusage
http://www.plus.net/supportpages.html?a=212

NZ ISP's are wimps Tongue out but seriously not many ISP's around the world are brave enough to put the real
stats out there.


Yes, quite afew ISP's overseas provide this type of information freely to anyone who wants to know.




CraZeD,
Your friendly Southern Geeky Fellow :P




1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152
Inactive user


  #337704 3-Jun-2010 11:17
Send private message

I would love to see statistics on all ISP's international links. I don't think information on local/national data is very important as the international link is the bottleneck. Possibly data on national backhaul as well.

I wish ISPs were forced to provide contention ratio information as well as how many customers make use of their international pipes and their sizes. This would greatly ease the performance woes of many people as they would be able to see which ISPs were over-selling and just what type of performance to expect _before_ signing up.

If every ISP was forced to do this the data would no longer be 'commercially sensitive' and we'd all have a better idea of what we were signing up for.

nate
6473 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 458

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#337821 3-Jun-2010 14:08
Send private message

Sounddude: I take bribes for such answers.


I spose the fairest way to decide who reveals this info is a paintball match.  Whoever wins is immune, everyone else has to cough up their data.

Any takers?



muppet
2647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1669

Trusted

  #337833 3-Jun-2010 14:23
Send private message

Well, I have no data to give, but I'd love to have a few pot shots!




Audiophiles are such twits! They buy such pointless stuff: Gold plated cables, $2000 power cords. Idiots.

 

OOOHHHH HYPERFIBRE!


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80665 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41105

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#337835 3-Jun-2010 14:27
Send private message

beachmark: Lets be honest. Telecom just sucks in pretty much everything these days and the New Zealander is the one short changed.

If any Telecom rep reads this: yes, I am willing to go into a public face to face discussion about performance.


How is this comment relevant to this discussion?





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Zeon
3926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 759

Trusted

  #337879 3-Jun-2010 15:40
Send private message

I know in 2006 Ihug had just over 1gbps of international bandwidth and 10gbps between their data center and the Sky Tower. So they probably had a 10Gbps link to APE and maybe 100mbps~ Telecom/Telstra.




Speedtest 2019-10-14


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
crazed

484 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 26

Trusted

  #337942 3-Jun-2010 17:14
Send private message

I think some of you guys are getting alittle confused here, I'm not asking for capacity of National and International Links at all.

What I'm asking is the total amount of traffic in GB or TB or what ever that say an ISP's customers have used in a 30 day period.

For example:

ISP has 3000 customers, each customer uses 60GB per month, therefore 3000 X 60 = 180,000GB or 180TB of data in a month.




CraZeD,
Your friendly Southern Geeky Fellow :P


Zeon
3926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 759

Trusted

  #337951 3-Jun-2010 17:50
Send private message

I don't think they themselves would even track that. And if they do, it doesn't really represent anything. For example at work we move 1TB+ a month between our office and our ISPs data center, maybe 300GB to APE/WIX/Other open peers and 100GB to Telecom and 5GB international. The cost to deliver all of those is signifcantly different so why would they want to know those details?

They are more interested about the load on each of those links hence why we talk about the amount of bandwidth they have.




Speedtest 2019-10-14


insane
3325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1006

ID Verified
Trusted
2degrees
Subscriber

  #338426 5-Jun-2010 00:54
Send private message

crazed: I think some of you guys are getting alittle confused here, I'm not asking for capacity of National and International Links at all.

What I'm asking is the total amount of traffic in GB or TB or what ever that say an ISP's customers have used in a 30 day period.

For example:

ISP has 3000 customers, each customer uses 60GB per month, therefore 3000 X 60 = 180,000GB or 180TB of data in a month.


Its basically the same thing though as you're still working this out over time. You can always do the maths to get it into XXgbps which as mentioned above is totally irrelevant to the quality of service users will get, so making this info public will not make much/any difference at all unless the ISP is being cheap and is underprovisioning their International transit connectivity.

If you google through enough nzherald articles you'll get an idea of how many users each ISP has. Some ISPs have managed to max out their DSL backhaul that they are allocated by Telecom Wholesale and therefore you can take the number of users they have x 10GB. 10GB per month is equal to the 32kbps each user is allocated by Telecom Wholesale to said ISPs.

So in your example expect to see that ISP moving Up To 30,000 GB of data in a month for DSL traffic, of which 80 to 90% of that will be international traffic based on what I've seen posted on this forum.



- This info here does not in any way reflect figures or ratios from the ISP I work for, please don't try to draw any parallels. -

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.