Like many other Geekzoners, I do a lot of speed testing.
I'm on "100/10 Mbps" HFC cable, which has had a lot of problems over the last 12 months (see Krapi Cable Congestion).
I often use the OOKLA speedtest (which uses Flash) as well as the nPerf speedtest (no Flash required). I'm also a TrueNet volunteer, so i have a third source of speed tests.
I find that OOKLA often gives much "better" (or more optimistic?) speeds than nPerf. eg downstream with OOKLA 101 Mbps vs nPerf 80 Mbps or less (both to fast Auckland servers).
In my experience, nPerf is closer to real-world performance (eg downloading a MS ISO) than OOKLA.
What is the experience of other Geekzoners?
