![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Benoire: From what the Twitter page has indicated, Snap are reviewing their prices but consider themselves competative enough at present so I'm not expecting anything decent.
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
Benoire: It is for me. I'm a snap customer and would jump at VDSL at similar prices to what I pay now, but at the moment its $50 more for the same service, just faster speeds and I cannot justify that at all.
chevrolux: Wouldn't touch Voyager with a 10 foot pole. Other people's experience's may be different but we are dealing with their VoIP team and communication is a bit rubbish. Price's are nothing special either.
Personally I don't see the problem paying another $20 considering the speed is going to be 3 times faster than ADSL.
I do notice that 2Talk's VDSL has been bought down in price and only $10 more than ADSL.
chevrolux:I do notice that 2Talk's VDSL has been bought down in price and only $10 more than ADSL.
Benoire: My issue is that if a product has been cut in price and is now no longer a premium product, why should it carry a price premium?! I understand companies will try to get as much as they can, a service is only worth what people are willing to pay for it... However I still don't understand why Snap are currently charging an extra $30 for VDSL with Pots over Naked VDSL...
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |