|
|
|
It would take 24 meetings to agree the schedule and agenda for the main meeting in that place!
i just don't know what are they waiting for, the number of cases is increasing day by day.
tdgeek: ... If our cases of 5 went from 1 to 5 to 25 I'd be wanting more than you are. But ts 5, like it was a week ago. I have NO issue with harsh action. But to trash our economy when there is zero evidence isnt wise. ...
Unfortunately, not so reassuring.
Our first case was diagnosed on 28 Feb, just 2 weeks ago and went from 1 - 5 in a week, with none since. So yes, after two weeks, we have 5 (equates to 60 for a population the size of Italy though)
The first (two) cases in Italy were diagnosed on 31 Jan. Six days later a 3rd case, and then no more for another two weeks. So three weeks in Italy had just 3 cases, despite 12 times the population. Now a touch over 3 weeks later they have 15,000+ cases.
Other countries have experienced a similar trajectories: UK 8 after 3 weeks, now 590; Spain just 3 after 3.5 weeks, now 3,148; Sweden only 1 after 3.5 weeks, now 688; ... and so on. The numbers after 3 weeks might have been reassuring to them also? Yes, European countries that did not get their first case until more recently (say late Feb) have not had the same 3 weeks grace. Fairly inevitable given that they are in a free travel area with a population of 400 million where SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading.
A few jurisdictions did apply stringent measures from the start and have avoided exponential increases in cases, even up to 7 weeks in.
==
So five after two weeks is not reassuring, nor is the fact that we have had none in the last week.
Do we learn from others or be lulled into complacency and hold back on stringent measures until too late? Either way will involve pain but not necessarily in equal measures.
Perhaps we should heed the collective wisdom passed down through the ages ... "a stitch in time saves nine".
mattwnz:
I see Italy now has 1000 deaths, But it says only 15,000 people are reported to have it. If following Chinas death rate, the number of actual people who have it could more than double that figure. Guessing a lot of people may not being tested, or wonder if there is another reason why their death rate percentage is a lot higher?
Few things to consider:
DS248:
tdgeek: ... If our cases of 5 went from 1 to 5 to 25 I'd be wanting more than you are. But ts 5, like it was a week ago. I have NO issue with harsh action. But to trash our economy when there is zero evidence isnt wise. ...
Unfortunately, not so reassuring.
Our first case was diagnosed on 28 Feb, just 2 weeks ago and went from 1 - 5 in a week, with none since. So yes, after two weeks, we have 5 (equates to 60 for a population the size of Italy though)
The first (two) cases in Italy were diagnosed on 31 Jan. Six days later a 3rd case, and then no more for another two weeks. So three weeks in Italy had just 3 cases, despite 12 times the population. Now a touch over 3 weeks later they have 15,000+ cases.
Other countries have experienced a similar trajectories: UK 8 after 3 weeks, now 590; Spain just 3 after 3.5 weeks, now 3,148; Sweden only 1 after 3.5 weeks, now 688; ... and so on. The numbers after 3 weeks might have been reassuring to them also? Yes, European countries that did not get their first case until more recently (say late Feb) have not had the same 3 weeks grace. Fairly inevitable given that they are in a free travel area with a population of 400 million where SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading.
A few jurisdictions did apply stringent measures from the start and have avoided exponential increases in cases, even up to 7 weeks in.
==
So five after two weeks is not reassuring, nor is the fact that we have had none in the last week.
Do we learn from others or be lulled into complacency and hold back on stringent measures until too late? Either way will involve pain but not necessarily in equal measures.
In the UK they have nearly 600 diagnosed cases, and 10 deaths. However they believe there are now 5,000 - 10,000 infected at this time, but not yet showing symptoms. So they have moved into the stage of delaying the spread. But they have warned that loved ones will die from this. My understanding is that the WHO wants countries to eliminate it, and not just try to slow down the spread. So the UK seem to be taking a different approach to Italy, who have basically made everyone self isolate themselves. The UK are still allowing schools to run etc, which I don't think is good. I also have concerns of Oz, as they seem to be in a similar situation.
Although NZ has officially had 5 confirmed cases, we don't know how many more currently infected at this time who have't been tested and not showing symptoms. 9000 or so are self isolated but we don't know if any of those are infected or not until they show symptoms, so it is a waiting game for them.
I fear that with no new official cases recently, it may lull some people into a false sense of security, and people may not be as careful as they should be in self isolating.
freitasm: Telstra announced all office employees to work from home starting this Monday.
The same here for HAPAG and SAP ... we got advise to follow on demand during the weekend as well. Got my Digital workplace at home (except flight operations ๐คจ).
My UK office has just announced WFH starting Monday. I start a new job in 3 weeks, could be interesting!
DS248:
Unfortunately, not so reassuring.
Our first case was diagnosed on 28 Feb, just 2 weeks ago and went from 1 - 5 in a week, with none since. So yes, after two weeks, we have 5 (equates to 60 for a population the size of Italy though)
The first (two) cases in Italy were diagnosed on 31 Jan. Six days later a 3rd case, and then no more for another two weeks. So three weeks in Italy had just 3 cases, despite 12 times the population. Now a touch over 3 weeks later they have 15,000+ cases.
Other countries have experienced a similar trajectories: UK 8 after 3 weeks, now 590; Spain just 3 after 3.5 weeks, now 3,148; Sweden only 1 after 3.5 weeks, now 688; ... and so on. The numbers after 3 weeks might have been reassuring to them also? Yes, European countries that did not get their first case until more recently (say late Feb) have not had the same 3 weeks grace. Fairly inevitable given that they are in a free travel area with a population of 400 million where SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading.
A few jurisdictions did apply stringent measures from the start and have avoided exponential increases in cases, even up to 7 weeks in.
==
So five after two weeks is not reassuring, nor is the fact that we have had none in the last week.
Do we learn from others or be lulled into complacency and hold back on stringent measures until too late? Either way will involve pain but not necessarily in equal measures.
Fair enough. Remember though, we have been exposed the same timeframe as everyone else. Far less people travel here than to Italy and virtually any other country. There are small populations in Europe, but Europe is the hotbed. It will eclipse China
What do you suggest? Serious question.
Batman: There's no need to wonder. UK are doing exactly the opposite of Europe. Just watch what happens and we'll know in a few days.
What are they doing? A quick check shows schools remain open, and if anyone gets a cough etc they have to self isolate fr 7 days
Ademir:
It would take 24 meetings to agree the schedule and agenda for the main meeting in that place!
i just don't know what are they waiting for, the number of cases is increasing day by day.

Trump just suggested that he may extend the Europe travel ban to include the UK. Supposedly there are announcements on new measures in a couple of hours.
Trump's press conference was scripted and timed solely to boost the markets.
Batman: There's no need to wonder. UK are doing exactly the opposite of Europe. Just watch what happens and we'll know in a few days.
You mean this? Let it infect everybody so that many die and the rest get herd immunity?
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/13/uk/uk-coronavirus-response-boris-johnson-intl-gbr/index.html
|
|
|