Batman:
interesting high court statement (assuming it is as it says and i think i understand it)
"He also said there was no requirement in the New Zealand Bill of Rights or any other piece of legislation that said that secondary legislation could not contain a provision that limiting one or more rights set out in the bill of rights."
There is nothing inherent in the bill of rights act that prevents parliament from over riding the rights described in it. NZ doesn't really have a constitution like somewhere like the US or even Australia.



