Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




BDFL - Memuneh
59392 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10605

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 183749 28-Oct-2015 21:37
2 people support this post
Send private message

Never let the truth get in the way of a good headline... Found this as an ad for a vegan website:



Sure, but let's look at something different:

Google tells me there's 2.8g of protein per 100g of broccoli which provides 34 calories. This means 294g of brocolli are needed for 100 calories. Do the maths and those 294g of brocolli are actually 8.23g of protein, not 11.1 as claimed.

Google tells me there's 26g of proteins per 100g of lean beef and 250 calories on this same 100g. So to get those 6.4g of protein we would need to eat only 24g of meat (against 294g of broccoli). This is only 60 calories (which means that you would get more than the claimed 6.4g of protein if you ate 100 calories of beef as per this ad).

Also they used calories... Let's use weight instead. 100g of beef will give you 26g of protein, while 100g of broccoli gives you 2.8g of protein. You would have to eat almost 10 times more broccoli in weight to get the same amount of protein as beef.







View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
6169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2894

Subscriber

  Reply # 1415832 28-Oct-2015 23:07
Send private message

This kind of thing is so widespread I don't think this specific example has any special significance. I'm sure there are plenty of meat ads that play just as fast and loose with the truth.

Anyway, if I want protein my first choice would not be broccoli.

 




I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


25816 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5546

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1415862 29-Oct-2015 06:15
Send private message

I remember a TV ad from the old days (I'm guessing probably the '90s) that showed a piece of meat on a plate and a plate of spinach comparing how much of both you needed to get the recommended intake of (off the top of my head) iron. As you can imagine the piece of meat was small. The plate of spinach was huge.



 
 
 
 


5984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 906

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1415864 29-Oct-2015 06:47
Send private message

At least that headline is technically true. A few weeks ago the local paper had a big headline saying "sugary drinks banned". In reality, a local organisation had chosen not to sell sugary drinks on its own premises - hardly the same thing!

Fully Operational
3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1088

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 1415865 29-Oct-2015 06:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

Surely you realise Google is part of the Big Meat Conspiracy?

1748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 916


  Reply # 1415870 29-Oct-2015 06:59
2 people support this post
Send private message

Reminds me of the flyer asking people if they want the real spin on meat.




Location: Dunedin

11505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5211

Trusted

  Reply # 1415871 29-Oct-2015 07:00
Send private message

Best thing is to spread the load. Lower the red meat intake a lot and increase the vegetable intake. Gives the energy needed and reduces the health risks.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


13448 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2274

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1415876 29-Oct-2015 07:20
Send private message

Assuming that graphic is accurate look at it another way: if you eat 294g of broccoli you're probably going to be pretty full, you've eaten 96 calories and 13g of protein (according to my fitness pal). If you eat 294g of eye fillet steak you've eaten 349 calories and 63g of protein. So for anyone losing weight the bulky broccoli is a better bet.

Unless you're trying to lose weight or gain muscle most people don't need that much protein a day. According to what I've read, given I'm trying to gain muscle, I need to eat around 200g of protein a day. Obviously very difficult eating natural foods for a vegetarian, so protein powders are required. 110 calories of protein powder gives you 30g of protein, which is even better than beef.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


Mad Scientist
17733 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2174

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1415885 29-Oct-2015 07:48
Send private message

I'm surprised the Vegan website uses a broccoli to sell their misleading agenda, PETA is way ahead of the game.

11505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5211

Trusted

  Reply # 1415886 29-Oct-2015 07:57
Send private message

Vegan is OK it's just not a lot of meat in the topic.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


509 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155
Inactive user


  Reply # 1416259 29-Oct-2015 17:45
Send private message

It comes down to empathy really.
Can you imagine being that brocolli.
Happily enjoying its life until one day, out of the blue its ripped out of its home by its hair,
Carted inside,
having its lower limbs removed ,
water boarded,
then slowly boiled within an inch of its life
only to then be stabbed with a large fork and lifted into the awaiting mouth of its murderer who grids it between his slab like teeth in some sort of sick ceremony that is repeated nightly.

You can buy protein shakes you know !
 

Mad Scientist
17733 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2174

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1416260 29-Oct-2015 17:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

Agree. Much kinder with cattle. Feed them, tlc them, stun them into a happy dream. No suffering.

604 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38


  Reply # 1416319 29-Oct-2015 19:01
Send private message

People replacing meat with something else, should make sure it provides a complete protein which broccoli doesn't.
Not to mention the B group vitamins,

A lot of people could benefit from reducing their meat intake, but misinformation isn't helping anyone.




#include <standard.disclaimer>

2801 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1213


  Reply # 1416341 29-Oct-2015 19:13
6 people support this post
Send private message

If it doesn't include meat...it's just a snack.






Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



5231 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2472


  Reply # 1416550 29-Oct-2015 23:37
Send private message

freitasm: 

Sure, but let's look at something different:

Google tells me there's 2.8g of protein per 100g of broccoli which provides 34 calories. This means 294g of brocolli are needed for 100 calories. Do the maths and those 294g of brocolli are actually 8.23g of protein, not 11.1 as claimed.



 I don't actually believe there's any protein at all in broccoli.  It's all in those long green superbly camouflaged caterpillars which infest all broccoli (unless nuked on a daily basis). The 2.8/100g shown on the lab analysis was surely the result of a lazy lab tech.

20559 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3956

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1416559 30-Oct-2015 01:38
Send private message

scuwp: If it doesn't include meat...it's just a snack.


Or garnishing




Richard rich.ms

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.