![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Fred99:
This thread is hilarious.
Infantile jokes about the PM's name is the best you can do ???
Really?
Good job on overlooking the actual discussion about the TWG. Picking your battles much?
networkn:
Right, because there is so much maturity and reason in your other favourite thread!
Anwyays, I thought you rage quit this thread already.
Trump is a bigoted misogynous lying filthy dirty piece of sh*t - who you've repeatedly "excused" in that thread.
As for "rage quitting" I said:
I might pop back in at a later date when I feel like having another laugh.
I'm laughing. At you. LOL.
GV27:
Fred99:
This thread is hilarious.
Infantile jokes about the PM's name is the best you can do ???
Really?
Good job on overlooking the actual discussion about the TWG. Picking your battles much?
This thread title is about "or new PM".
A TWG was always on the agenda, you'll get to vote on any proposed policy decisions made as a result - in 2020.
The name calling crap is a sad reflection on the fact that even talking about change seems to be verboten in this echo chamber of conservative snowflakes.
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
Fred99:
This thread title is about "or new PM".
A TWG was always on the agenda, you'll get to vote on any proposed policy decisions made as a result - in 2020.
The name calling crap is a sad reflection on the fact that even talking about change seems to be verboten in this echo chamber of conservative snowflakes.
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
A TWG was on the agenda, not a fait accompli which has been massively politicised by Cullen, who seems to think he's still Deputy PM.
Perhaps we should talk about the gagging order on Kelvin Davis or (with the massive caveat of 'If what Hosking has said is true') PM Arden refusing to talk to NewstalkZB about anything other than her Pacific trip?
Fred99:
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
How passive aggressive of you. Don't hurry back on our account.
networkn:
Fred99:
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
How passive aggressive of you. Don't hurry back on our account.
get a life, man. Your posts here have really deteriorated.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
networkn:
Fred99:
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
How passive aggressive of you. Don't hurry back on our account.
get a life, man. Your posts here have really deteriorated.
and here comes Rikkitic to try and the the last word in by taking it to gutter....
Fred99:
Trump is a bigoted misogynous lying filthy dirty piece of sh*t -
Fred99:
The name calling crap is a sad reflection on ...(blah blah blah)
I'm honestly not sure how you live with yourself.
6FIEND:
Fred99:
Trump is a bigoted misogynous lying filthy dirty piece of sh*t -
Fred99:
The name calling crap is a sad reflection on ...(blah blah blah)
I'm honestly not sure how you live with yourself.
Rikkitic:
get a life, man. Your posts here have really deteriorated.
When was the last time you contributed to this discussion, other than to superficially (Not even constructively) criticize someone elses post? When you are asked to contribute something meaningful, like comment on policy, or provide an alternative position including something to support said argument you decline. If I make a comment, I am happy to justify it. If I hold a position or opinion, I am also happy to justify it. If there is evidence (proper evidence not just someone elses opinion) then I am prepared to consider a switch of opinion. I do not claim to be always correct, but I expect justification for a change of position.
I suggest you review *your* last 20 comments in this thread, and see how many actually justified a position, argued a point or otherwise supported your position.
it is hard to type on my device so i will come back to this later but i will collect all your unsubstantiated anti-jacinda comments, pointless digs and slurs, and other similar remarks and feed them back to you when i return home. you used to deal in 'facts', even if they were disputable. now you just keep braying 'jacinda bad' to your echo chambre audience of three.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Pumpedd:
Rikkitic:
networkn:
Fred99:
Bye again for now. I'll pop back in for another laugh later perhaps.
How passive aggressive of you. Don't hurry back on our account.
get a life, man. Your posts here have really deteriorated.
and here comes Rikkitic to try and the the last word in by taking it to gutter....
and here come's laurel to networkn's hardy, or maybe it is tweedledum to tweedledee.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
it is hard to type on my device so i will come back to this later but i will collect all your unsubstantiated anti-jacinda comments, pointless digs and slurs, and other similar remarks and feed them back to you when i return home. you used to deal in 'facts', even if they were disputable. now you just keep braying 'jacinda bad' to your echo chambre audience of three.
That's an interesting take on the situation. I have asked multiple times what people think Labour/JA is doing well, that is deserving of praise.. Result.. CRICKETS.
I've provided quite a few examples of where policy has been rolled back, and policy implemented is having a negative effect on real people and business (Because Labour hasn't thought policy and it's impact out properly).
Geektastic:
I personally find this article about her spending spree in the Pacific islands a bit of a concern.
I find the Governments spending spree somewhat a concern.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |