Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 361 | 362 | 363 | 364 | 365 | 366 | 367 | 368 | 369 | 370 | 371 | ... | 2481
Sideface
9650 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15602

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #1757369 6-Apr-2017 09:21
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

Steve Bannon removed from National Security Council.

 

Reasons suggested by the WH for this don't make sense ie "he was only there to keep an eye on Flynn" (WTF???).

 

More likely his atrocious religious-war-mongering apocalyptic views, comparing himself to Satan and Darth Vadar were upsetting too many of the "establishment" and/or some of his history at Breitbart etc is going to catch up with him.

 

I try not to judge people on how they look, but...

 

 

Maybe it was a dress code problem ...

 





Sideface


Sideface
9650 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15602

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #1757384 6-Apr-2017 09:48
Send private message quote this post

Trump defends Bill O'Reilly: 'I don't think Bill did anything wrong'

President Pussygroper has given Bill O'Reilly (Fox News) a character reference:   undecided

“Personally, I think he shouldn’t have settled,” Mr. Trump said in an interview in the Oval Office with Times reporters. “Because you should have taken it all the way; I don’t think Bill did anything wrong.”

“I think he’s a person I know well - he is a good person,” Mr. Trump said.

Last week, Trump declared April 2017 National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, pledging that his administration "will do everything in its power to protect women, children, and men from sexual violence."





Sideface


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1757385 6-Apr-2017 09:50
Send private message quote this post


sir1963
3428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3756

Subscriber

  #1757389 6-Apr-2017 09:57
Send private message quote this post

blakamin:

 

sir1963:

 

 

 

Probably have to pay a fortune to ensure all the rooms around the president are empty etc etc etc too.

 

 

 

 

He has a private wing. 

 

Always has.

 

He bought the place 30 years ago. By offering the family $15m, and when they turned him down, he tried to buy the land between Mar-a-Lago and the beach, and then told them he was going to build out their view.

 

They sold him the place for a third of the price he offered first. He's an ar$3hole.

 

 

 

I wonder how his support of a Syrian dictator is going today :(

 

 

 

 

Yeah, but do all the hanger oners have to pay his exorbitant fees for staying there.


TheLastTherapist
16 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  #1757800 6-Apr-2017 20:56
Send private message quote this post

freitasm:

 

I am convinced that Hilary did not get the vote of the majority because she is a woman and was following a black President. Racists and misogynists couldn't allow that.

 

 

That's certainly a perspective that serves current Dem leadership well. Faced with a loss to a rank (indeed, stinking) outsider they could either acknowledge that they just spent eight years either ignoring or failing working people in the US (a hard call for anyone to make), or they could say that those same working people are racists and sexists and didn't support the candidate (basically because they're stupid).

That perspective becomes harder to swallow when you think that the US electorate were non-racist enough to vote for Obama twice, which makes it a stretch to then say they were then, so racist against Obama that they wouldn't vote for a white woman he endorsed. 
Likewise the gender thing (apart from letting the Dem leadership off the hook)...
Both Trump and Clinton won their gender's votes by 12%, which net advantaged Hillary (more women voted than men).

And Hillary arguably had the better of any gender split, being on track to be the first female president (whereas Trump was just another in a long line of rich white men).

Hard to draw a conclusion either way, but interesting that Dem leadership's conclusion is the one that lets them off the hook, and doesn't require them to admit fault or examine their policy platform. Especially to lose to such an awful, awful candidate.


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1757822 6-Apr-2017 21:51
Send private message quote this post

The pain experienced by the US "working class" was an inevitable consequence of the GFC.  It's a fundamental problem - when there's an economic shock, the poor always get hit hardest.  It was actually factions from the right arguing that bailouts shouldn't happen -  the "tea party" and libertarians argument anyway - was to let them fail. That wasn't an option for "moderates" from either side.  

 

I believe that the fundamental change that ultimately resulted in the GFC goes back to the Reagan / Greenspan era, not just the repeated mantra that "greed is good", but to divide and conquer the "working class".  It freaking well worked - you'll find the strongest nationalist support amongst the "working class".  They're the Fox News audience - unfortunately it's the only voice they think they've got.  

 

So Trump jumped on that.  Of course it's sexist.  Also racist - very distressing to some that there was visible social mobility with women and blacks apparently doing better than many of the "proud" white working class American.  Convince them that's a result of "liberal" values, and get them on side to support a right-wing agenda - to protect the absurd notion that the rich are being disadvantaged.  It's f%$^ing nuts.

 

The world has gone backwards. Pussy-grabbing, abusive, openly anti-liberal megalomaniac as POTUS?  Unthinkable - even to conservatives from the Reagan / Thatcher era.


sir1963
3428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3756

Subscriber

  #1757921 7-Apr-2017 08:53
Send private message quote this post

sir1963:

 

blakamin:

 

sir1963:

 

 

 

Probably have to pay a fortune to ensure all the rooms around the president are empty etc etc etc too.

 

 

 

 

He has a private wing. 

 

Always has.

 

He bought the place 30 years ago. By offering the family $15m, and when they turned him down, he tried to buy the land between Mar-a-Lago and the beach, and then told them he was going to build out their view.

 

They sold him the place for a third of the price he offered first. He's an ar$3hole.

 

 

 

I wonder how his support of a Syrian dictator is going today :(

 

 

 

 

Yeah, but do all the hanger oners have to pay his exorbitant fees for staying there.

 

 

 

 

This may answer the question

 

http://daringfireball.net/2017/04/so_called

 

 

 

Looks like he is using the presidency to line his own pocket. 


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1757958 7-Apr-2017 09:47
Send private message quote this post

sir1963: 

 

Looks like he is using the presidency to line his own pocket. 

 

 

And his family's pockets.

 

Then there's:

 

Donald Trump's travel expenses in 10 weeks cost US taxpayers as much as Barack Obama spent in two years

 

 


kingdragonfly
11992 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12887

Subscriber

  #1758122 7-Apr-2017 13:26
Send private message quote this post

Click to see full size

"On April 6, Twitter filed a lawsuit alleging the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had attempted to use a customs summons to unmask the identity of an anonymous Twitter user critical of the administration. In its complaint, Twitter alleged that the request exceeded Homeland Security's authority and infringed on the constitutional rights of Twitter's users to engage in political speech.

'Homeland Security's effort to stretch an obscure customs regulation to stifle political dissent is deeply troubling,' said Austin Evers, executive director of American Oversight. 'This raises serious questions about the new administration. We have a right to know whether this action was ordered by political leadership or even the White House. While government officials don't have the right to expose the identities of people who criticize them, the American people do have the right to identify government officials who try to abuse their power.'

American Oversight is filing Freedom of Information Act requests to uncover the facts behind DHS's actions and will publish the results for the public to read."

https://www.americanoversight.org/news/american-oversight-investigates-dhs-attempt-stifle-online-criticism

Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16318

Lifetime subscriber

  #1758126 7-Apr-2017 13:37
Send private message quote this post

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


sir1963
3428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3756

Subscriber

  #1758139 7-Apr-2017 13:52
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sigh..... 


DarthKermit

5346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3317

Trusted

  #1758149 7-Apr-2017 14:22
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

 

 

 

Geeze, might be a good time to buy some shares in US defense contractors. undecided


MikeAqua
8031 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3820


  #1758152 7-Apr-2017 14:38
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

About effing time.

 

To paraphrase some vintage Reagan ....

 

Assad counted on America to be passive. He counted wrong.





Mike


throbb
675 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 167


  #1758157 7-Apr-2017 14:43
Send private message quote this post

MikeAqua:

 

Rikkitic:

 

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

About effing time.

 

To paraphrase some vintage Reagan ....

 

Assad counted on America to be passive. He counted wrong.

 

 

His mate Putin wont be happy.


Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1758162 7-Apr-2017 14:45
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Breaking news: US warships have fired Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase on Trump's orders.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html

 

 

 

 

Better not hit any Russian stuff ... big brother Putin won't be happy

 

If I were Assad, I'd be planting some Russians here and there ...


1 | ... | 361 | 362 | 363 | 364 | 365 | 366 | 367 | 368 | 369 | 370 | 371 | ... | 2481
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.