Donald Trump, US President #47, US President #45, convicted felon, twice impeached, four times indicted, liable of rape, convicted for financial fraud, guilty of hiding hush money payments to porn actress in attempt to influence 2016 elections

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification

Forums › Politics › Donald Trump, US President #47, US President #45, convicted felon, twice impeached, four times indicted, liable of rape, convicted for financial fraud, guilty of hiding hush money payments to porn actress in attempt to influence 2016 elections

1 | ... | 557 | 558 | 559 | 560 | 561 | 562 | 563 | 564 | 565 | 566 | 567 | ... | 2317

1139 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1972100 9-Mar-2018 19:07

Sideface:

President Trump agrees to meet with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un

This thread might just become a little more interesting and newsworthy again. I wonder which of these two monkeys will be able to jump the highest for nomination of the Nobel Peace Prize?

tdgeek

29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1972103 9-Mar-2018 19:13

DaveB:

Sideface:

President Trump agrees to meet with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un

This thread might just become a little more interesting and newsworthy again. I wonder which of these two monkeys will be able to jump the highest for nomination of the Nobel Peace Prize?

They will say they deserve it, but SK is the hero, notwithstanding if there is a result or not. I feel you will see that this issue is going to be handled by Asia.

What I dont get is all the commentators say that denuclearisation is not on the table for NK, for any reasons, yet SK said that Kim said that is a goal, or similar.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek

#1972112 9-Mar-2018 20:00

Stan:

I don't think you understand the meaning of supporting a political party technically voting for them is supporting them.

So if you live in the United States I would have taken it that you would have voted for Hillary going by your previous posts?

You said "support Trump" not "support the GOP".

I'd have voted for a baboon if it hadn't done things like endorsing sexual assault of women, fascists, racists, and mocking disabled people.

Stan:

You clearly have not watched much in the way of Paul Joseph Watson.

While I don't agree with all of his content he is a political commentator rather than a conspiracy theorist on the vast majority of his work.

Edit:spelling

He absolutely is a conspiracy theorist, he is not a "political commentator" - unless you think Infowars is "journalism" - LOL.

Prior to becoming a conspiracy theorist and alt-right nutter, he cleaned toilets for a living, so he's probably quite comfortable in his present environment.

(LOL - your original typo "political contaminator" seems as if your spell checker was programmed by me. Quick - tweet Alex Jones - there's a story in that)

tdgeek

29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1972123 9-Mar-2018 20:11

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/08/politics/north-korea-us-trump-white-house-surprise/index.html

Funny last quote by Trump, said a few days ago

"I won't rule out direct talks with Kim Jong Un. I just won't," the President said. "As far as the risk of dealing with a madman is concerned, that's his problem, not mine."

Priceless

DaveB

1139 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1972124 9-Mar-2018 20:12

tdgeek:
DaveB:

Sideface:

President Trump agrees to meet with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un

This thread might just become a little more interesting and newsworthy again. I wonder which of these two monkeys will be able to jump the highest for nomination of the Nobel Peace Prize?

They will say they deserve it, but SK is the hero, notwithstanding if there is a result or not. I feel you will see that this issue is going to be handled by Asia.

What I dont get is all the commentators say that denuclearisation is not on the table for NK, for any reasons, yet SK said that Kim said that is a goal, or similar.

Meanwhile on iptv. MSNBC are staying focused on the Porn Actress Stormy Daniels and a reference to the words Paternity Questions.CNN, not to be outdone also focus on Stormy Daniels, but with the additional headlines that Trump is pissed with Sarah Saunders for not lying and deflecting this issue. North Korea? Trump is jumping the gun.

Fox News US? The meeting with NK was always part of Trumps grand plan since the presidential transition.

Perhaps I should turn back to NZ TV. At least we know Married At First Sight is real. Isn't it?

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972138 9-Mar-2018 20:36

Fred99:

Stan:

I don't think you understand the meaning of supporting a political party technically voting for them is supporting them.

So if you live in the United States I would have taken it that you would have voted for Hillary going by your previous posts?

You said "support Trump" not "support the GOP".

I'd have voted for a baboon if it hadn't done things like endorsing sexual assault of women, fascists, racists, and mocking disabled people.

Stan:

You clearly have not watched much in the way of Paul Joseph Watson.

While I don't agree with all of his content he is a political commentator rather than a conspiracy theorist on the vast majority of his work.

Edit:spelling

He absolutely is a conspiracy theorist, he is not a "political commentator" - unless you think Infowars is "journalism" - LOL.

Prior to becoming a conspiracy theorist and alt-right nutter, he cleaned toilets for a living, so he's probably quite comfortable in his present environment.

(LOL - your original typo "political contaminator" seems as if your spell checker was programmed by me. Quick - tweet Alex Jones - there's a story in that)

So you wouldn't have voted for Clinton then I take it?

PJW is not alt-right im not sure you understand what alt-right is or don't know alot about his content judging by your comments I would say the latter is true.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek

#1972148 9-Mar-2018 21:10

Stan:

PJW is not alt-right im not sure you understand what alt-right is or don't know alot about his content judging by your comments I would say the latter is true.

Oh yes he most certainly is.

Visit his website - and he's obsessed with things like the fact that the creator of Pepe the Frog is suing Infowars, presents a "poll" arguing that "feminism is a refuge for ugly losers", as well as the usual alt-right anti-refugee tripe and lies commonly held by his dirty filthy fascist aligned ilk.

He is a pathetic, uneducated, uninformed piece of sh!t.

Anybody supporting him is an idiot.

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972149 9-Mar-2018 21:10

Really good article here

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972160 9-Mar-2018 21:32

Fred99:

Stan:

PJW is not alt-right im not sure you understand what alt-right is or don't know alot about his content judging by your comments I would say the latter is true.

Oh yes he most certainly is.

Visit his website - and he's obsessed with things like the fact that the creator of Pepe the Frog is suing Infowars, presents a "poll" arguing that "feminism is a refuge for ugly losers", as well as the usual alt-right anti-refugee tripe and lies commonly held by his dirty filthy fascist aligned ilk.

He is a pathetic, uneducated, uninformed piece of sh!t.

Anybody supporting him is an idiot.

You don't know what the alt right is.

The alt right is a white identitarian movement similar it seeks to create a white ethnostate, actual alt-right people are: Richard Spencer, Tara McCarthy, Colin Robertson etc

Being anti "refugee" mass migration in particularly in Europe or anti 3rd wave feminism is not alt-right plenty on the left and the right hold these points of views.

Giving some examples would be:

Dr Christina Hoff Sommers a feminist and author who is anti 3rd wave feminism (democrat liberal, not alt right)

Dr Jordan Peterson a professor, best selling author and one of the world most cited clinical physiologists disagrees with mass refugee immigration and modern day feminism. (Liberal not alt right)

Ben Shapiro lawyer, author and political commentator, disagrees with mass refugee immigration and modern day feminism (conservative Jewish not alt right he infact was one of the most attacked figures by the alt right)

Do you understand see the difference?

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972161 9-Mar-2018 21:37

Forgot to mention none of those people support Trump Sam Harris is another good example.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek

#1972163 9-Mar-2018 21:54

Stan:

Really good article here

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8

Did he write that before or after Putin released a video simulation of his new nukes striking Florida, before or after the mysterious nerve-gas poisoning in the UK?

As a claimed "human rights lawyer", perhaps he should read the wikipedia page.

Knowing how left-wing biased the Huffington Post generally is, I'd actually suspect that article was published by them as a variation of the "concern troll" technique.

Yes - the USA has done some awful things. That author is however presenting "fake news".

For example:

"Reagan’s support of apartheid South Africa’s rampage through Southern Africa which resulted in the deaths of 1.5 million people"

That is abject BS. I despise Reagan for many reasons, but to suggest he "supported apartheid" is a lie. He opposed economic sanctions - because he (probably correctly at the time) believed that sanctions would hit the already impoverished hardest. His veto only lasted 3 days.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek

#1972166 9-Mar-2018 22:02

Stan:

Do you understand see the difference?

Yes I do, but Paul Joseph Watson is alt right even if he doesn't like that label applied to himself (probably because he'd prefer to be thought of as more "mainstream" than the whack job he is, Infowars is alt right and a fake news site, some of those ideologists you post the names of are heroes of the alt right because they challenge accepted views in a way that has appeal to some people, and you're getting way, way off topic. Start a new thread on "followers of Ayn Rand and other quasi-religious zealots" if you want to continue.

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972169 9-Mar-2018 22:11

Fred99:

Stan:

Do you understand see the difference?

Yes I do, but Paul Joseph Watson is alt right even if he doesn't like that label applied to himself, Infowars is alt right and a fake news site, some of those ideologists you post links to are heroes of the alt right, and you're getting way, way off topic. Start a new thread on "followers of Ayn Rand and other quasi-religious zealots" if you want to continue.

Sigh PJW is not alt right you have provided 0 evidence liking a frog meme does not = alt right.

I would not title my thread as such.

Other wise if you want to know someones political affiliation why not ask them?

What is your political affiliation are you alt right?

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek

#1972170 9-Mar-2018 22:21

Stan:

Sigh PJW is not alt right you have provided 0 evidence liking a frog meme does not = alt right.

Yes he is, and yes it does.

Is that enough - or do you want to continue with your stupid claims?

I'm over "discussion" with you. And it's getting seriously off-topic. Start another thread if you want.

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#1972172 9-Mar-2018 22:38

Fred99:

Stan:

Sigh PJW is not alt right you have provided 0 evidence liking a frog meme does not = alt right.

Yes he is, and yes it does.

Is that enough - or do you want to continue with your stupid claims?

I'm over "discussion" with you. And it's getting seriously off-topic. Start another thread if you want.

Nope that's not where near enough.

That article from the guardian is created by someone who doesn't understand memes

1 | ... | 557 | 558 | 559 | 560 | 561 | 562 | 563 | 564 | 565 | 566 | 567 | ... | 2317