People using Spark's 5G Wireless Broadband at home, how is it? What's the speed like?
If you have the Nokia gateway, are you able to put it in bridge mode? Are there any other weird restrictions?
|
|
|
Thought I would give it a try. These are my immediate thoughts.
Physical connectivity
Pricing
Software
Wi-Fi connectivity
IP addressing
Lastly, the all important speedtest:

So, am I happy with this, having used exclusively fibre (originally 200/20 then 200/200 then 1000/500) for the past decade or so?
Generally, yes. The Spark 5G network is very solid. Even when I was having the 5G glitch where the device fell back to only 4G, I didn't even really notice as I was still getting around 200 Mbps download.
The hardware itself appears solid but it's the software that ultimately lets it down. This was something of a surprise for me at least with it being Nokia.
And while the rest of my network is UniFi and I'd have liked to have picked-up a UniFi 5G Max, the prices for them domestically are frankly crazy ($1000+) for what's inside (the radio chipset appears to be inferior to even that of the $199 Nokia).
I would never give up a fibre connection for FWA no matter what the “savings” you are risking congestion if circumstances in your area change
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Unfortunately, overnight the software experience on the Nokia went from mostly working but occasionally frustrating to just downright dysfunctional with the connection down no less than six times past midnight.



When the connection goes down and then - ten minutes or so later - comes back up, it never comes back with 5G nor 4G carrier aggregation. There is nothing in the logs to suggest why that is. That's despite being less than 500 metres from the tower with mostly line-of-sight. Rebooting the device always brings 5G back, but this should not be necessary for me to do.

The gateway does not appear to handle cell changes properly, either. It can take around 5 minutes to re-establish itself after a cell ID change.
Not sure where to go on this next. This appears to just be software issues inherent to the device. I'd like to return it now (the connection itself appears to be fine) but don't know what receiver I'd use in its place.
It'll depend on your use case. My elderly mother lives across the road from a Spark 4G tower that has L700/1800/2100/2300x3/2600. You can see the panels from her lounge window and that is where the CPE sits. She's had no complaints for her ocassional Netflix shows and checking email messages. I think this is really the target market for WBB -- people in good service areas that don't require much in the way of data. I think it's a great option for low usage customers but agree it's not a substitute for fibre.
People on this forum love to bash wireless, but a lot of people have very basic needs. If you're just doing your banking and sending the odd email then you wouldn't notice the difference between wireless and fibre.
alasta:
People on this forum love to bash wireless, but a lot of people have very basic needs. If you're just doing your banking and sending the odd email then you wouldn't notice the difference between wireless and fibre.
Spark, to their credit, gave me a pretty much no questions asked full refund of the hardware, as well as including the plan charges (even without the 30-days notice). It's a real shame as I was very happy with the Spark 5G network when it worked, and it does work well on all the phones in our households - but the Nokia FastMile software is just junk.
Side note - does anyone in here know if the Spark FWA SIM's are still TAC-locked? I really should have tried it before I returned the device but I didn't have an alternate 5G CPE with me.
@boosacnoodle I take it you don't have access to fibre?
Linux:
@boosacnoodle I take it you don't have access to fibre?
He does and has been on Fibre, as above wanting to save money
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
The fact of the matter is there is no comparable product that will come close to fibre, if you have access to fibre then you should be on fibre.
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
nztim:
Linux:
@boosacnoodle I take it you don't have access to fibre?
He does and has been on Fibre, as above wanting to save money
Why why why
Because not everyone has the luxury of being able to afford the expensive option every time, so trying the inexpensive option to see if it works OK is worthwhile.
Linux:
Why why why
I would have no problem with the government mandating that if you are in a specified fibre area then the only connection you are allowed to have is fibre.
Now obviously this mandate would allow for competing LFCs to provide service (for example Chorus, Vital & Vector competing against each other in Wellington and Auckland) but the technology must be fibre.
And also 4g/5g is an acceptable backup solution but the primary connection must be fibre
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
RunningMan:
Because not everyone has the luxury of being able to afford the expensive option every time, so trying the inexpensive option to see if it works OK is worthwhile.
@RunningMan Expensive? Unlimited fibre under $70 per month I actually pay $55
Yep, but as per the OP, got it down to less than half that, saving $40 per month, assuming it works OK.
|
|
|