![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Currently we are sending out PACE V5542s untill we secure our residential stock for modems which should be the Technicolor TG587n
Publius:
No, blame Telecom for not getting their act together in time to offer a voice over fibre product. Seriously. Chorus UFB has been available since June 2012 now. Thats 10 months. The Chorus ONT has been available to ISPs to test for much longer than that. At the very least they could have just done what other ISPs are happy doing -- use a CPE device with an ATA.
This is very much a Telecom problem.
sbiddle:Publius:
No, blame Telecom for not getting their act together in time to offer a voice over fibre product. Seriously. Chorus UFB has been available since June 2012 now. Thats 10 months. The Chorus ONT has been available to ISPs to test for much longer than that. At the very least they could have just done what other ISPs are happy doing -- use a CPE device with an ATA.
This is very much a Telecom problem.
You clearly don't understand the reasons for the delays and the changes to ONT provisioning which still aren't complete.
Publius:sbiddle:Publius:
No, blame Telecom for not getting their act together in time to offer a voice over fibre product. Seriously. Chorus UFB has been available since June 2012 now. Thats 10 months. The Chorus ONT has been available to ISPs to test for much longer than that. At the very least they could have just done what other ISPs are happy doing -- use a CPE device with an ATA.
This is very much a Telecom problem.
You clearly don't understand the reasons for the delays and the changes to ONT provisioning which still aren't complete.
Are you saying no ISP can currently use the ATA on the ONT?
richms: If that is really a TSO problem, then it is time that telecom were released from that misguided obsolete agreement, it has no place post chorus split.
If anything the TSO crap should have gone to chorus.
Also, where is it written that the analog phone service has to come into the property? Surely telecom could deliver it to the boundary and leave it to the customer to bring it to the house if they actually want it?
common sense is not very common
richms: If that is really a TSO problem, then it is time that telecom were released from that misguided obsolete agreement, it has no place post chorus split.
If anything the TSO crap should have gone to chorus.
Also, where is it written that the analog phone service has to come into the property? Surely telecom could deliver it to the boundary and leave it to the customer to bring it to the house if they actually want it?
Regards,
Old3eyes
ashnizzle:Currently we are sending out PACE V5542s untill we secure our residential stock for modems which should be the Technicolor TG587n
Are the Pace V5542s 2.4 and 5Ghz?
Yyrael:ashnizzle:Currently we are sending out PACE V5542s untill we secure our residential stock for modems which should be the Technicolor TG587n
Are the Pace V5542s 2.4 and 5Ghz?
It is 802.11n 3x3 @ 2.4GHz only
ashnizzle:Yyrael:ashnizzle:Currently we are sending out PACE V5542s untill we secure our residential stock for modems which should be the Technicolor TG587n
Are the Pace V5542s 2.4 and 5Ghz?
It is 802.11n 3x3 @ 2.4GHz only
Thanks for that. I've ordered to get Fibre installed at my place too. Got the technicolor modem already. Just hoping that they dont have to dig a trench in my property (big concrete driveway) to get fibre installed. house is 10 years old so hopefully is already has ducts. but we'll see when technicians come. fingers crossed
Bazil: Just had Telecom UFB installed today. Network performance is excellent, very happy so far with the product and service.
Received a Pace v5542 router from Telecom for this install - much better than my old technicolor. Shortcoming is no user manual (only a quickstart) for the v5542. Telecom says coming soon, and Google searches proving fruitless, surely there is a user manual out there somewhere? The Pace UI is frustratingly limited.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |