Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Geektastic

17960 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8377

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#190693 9-Jan-2016 01:12
Send private message

What law allows VF to pass this charge on to us?





Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
DarkShadow
1647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 656


  #1466302 9-Jan-2016 01:27
Send private message

Why does Vodafone need a specific law to charge you a fee? They did tell you about the fee before they charged you so they satisfied the requirements of consumer law. If you're not happy you can always not use their services.



richms
28343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9325

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1466306 9-Jan-2016 02:21
Send private message

Laws dont allow things, the prohibit things.

So where is the law that says that they cant pass this charge on to you, or make up any charge and stick it on the bill?




Richard rich.ms

tdgeek
29819 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9155

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1466345 9-Jan-2016 08:42
Send private message

Its not a telco increase of price. Its passing on a Govt levy. Given that being a telco is a difficult business, and what we pay has given higher and higher GB allowances, minutes, free add ons year on year, I think its fair to not expect them to absorb another cost, a cost which is in the interests of the national population. 



ajw

ajw
1933 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 349


  #1466348 9-Jan-2016 08:57
Send private message

I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure. People are not forced to live in rural locations.

ubergeeknz
3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

Trusted
Vocus

  #1466354 9-Jan-2016 09:30
Send private message

ajw: I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure.


Because we have a 19th century economy which revolves around farming?

ajw

ajw
1933 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 349


  #1466355 9-Jan-2016 09:37
Send private message

ubergeeknz:
ajw: I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure.


Because we have a 19th century economy which revolves around farming?


And the majority support a national government.

MikeB4
18464 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12124

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1466364 9-Jan-2016 10:11
Send private message

Isn't this just a few dollars? Small charge to improve our infrastructure in our most important revenue generating regions

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
MikeB4
18464 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12124

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1466365 9-Jan-2016 10:12
Send private message

ajw: I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure. People are not forced to live in rural locations.


You benefit greatly from these people

ajw

ajw
1933 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 349


  #1466366 9-Jan-2016 10:16
Send private message

MikeB4:
ajw: I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure. People are not forced to live in rural locations.


You benefit greatly from these people


Tell that to the telecos who weren't interested in building infrastructure in rural areas unless they got millions of $$$ of taxpayers money.

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79608 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 38034

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1466367 9-Jan-2016 10:16
Send private message

MikeB4: Isn't this just a few dollars? Small charge to improve our infrastructure in our most important revenue generating regions


I thought Chorus (and the other network managers) were in charge of the infrastructure. And they already charge for that...







Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Geekzone and Quic social @ DataVault Auckland 18 Oct 2025 11AM - 2:30 PM


tdgeek
29819 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9155

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1466368 9-Jan-2016 10:18
Send private message

MikeB4: Isn't this just a few dollars? Small charge to improve our infrastructure in our most important revenue generating regions


$11.88 per year.

Not worth a thread or a news article IMHO

gregmcc
2161 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 826

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1466389 9-Jan-2016 10:34
Send private message

I can understand the levy to some degree, Ok fine I'll gin and bear it, but what really grates me is that I not just paying it once on my broadband account I paying it again on my mobile on account, and again on my wife's on account mobile, but the pre-pay accounts pay *nothing* - go figure




Ouranos
118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  #1466390 9-Jan-2016 10:38
Send private message

Geektastic: What law allows VF to pass this charge on to us?

To answer the OP, the law that gives the Government the right to impose the levy is the Telecommunications Act 2001, as amended by Acts such as the Telecommunications (Development Levy) Amendment Bill which increased funding for the Rural Broadband Initiative and established a Mobile Black Spots Fund. The retail telcos can then charge whatever they like, including labelling some of the price as a levy, provided that the laballing is  not misleading.

ajw

ajw
1933 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 349


  #1466392 9-Jan-2016 10:39
Send private message

gregmcc: I can understand the levy to some degree, Ok fine I'll gin and bear it, but what really grates me is that I not just paying it once on my broadband account I paying it again on my mobile on account, and again on my wife's on account mobile, but the pre-pay accounts pay *nothing* - go figure





Quite simple prepay users are free to switch providers at any time. Very competitive out there now. I do wish warehouse mobile would introduce more prepay plans.

Linuxluver
5828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1632

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1466426 9-Jan-2016 11:00
Send private message

ajw: I disagree, if people choose to live in a rural location why should the taxpayer have to contribute by paying millions of $$$ in subsidies to supply modern telecommunications infrastructure. People are not forced to live in rural locations.


Because we're all in it together as Kiwis who look after each other?  The sort of thinking you describe is selfish and nothing would ever get done because anyone not directly benefiting - today (no imagination about tomorrow) doesn't want to pay for it. 




_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.