Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ... | 25
Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #2374474 12-Dec-2019 22:54
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

If 47 is too may people to risk, 3 or 4 are? My point still stands. Is your point that it should always have been shut down, or that it should be limited to just a few people each visit? 

 

 

 

 

3 or 4 are a hell of a lot less potential fatalities and a hell of a lot easier to evacuate.  Sure - I'd be okay with reducing access so only a few could go - better than closing it down entirely - which is what i expect will happen.




eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6203

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374497 13-Dec-2019 04:15
Send private message

Mahon:

 

eracode:

 

DarthKermit:

 

We have the technical ability to make cars and planes safer. We can't make volcanoes safer.

 

 

Of course we can. We can avoid the danger of volcanoes by not getting close to them. They’re totally safe if you’re nowhere near them.

 

 

So based on that Aucklanders should all evacuate???

 

 

Of course you’re correct - but I think you know I meant by not wilfully going close to an obviously active volcano and peering down into the crater.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2374500 13-Dec-2019 06:54
Send private message

Even if they don't formally close it, how many will choose to go out there in future now the potential has become reality? If not shut down, there will need to be significant change. A significant exclusion zone around the crater and visitors kept close to easily accessible purpose built permanent shelters?



floydbloke
3646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4554

ID Verified

  #2374508 13-Dec-2019 07:21
Send private message

Kia kaha and good luck to all those involved in the recovery mission today.  





Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.


eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6203

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374513 13-Dec-2019 07:41
Send private message

dafman: Even if they don't formally close it, how many will choose to go out there in future now the potential has become reality? If not shut down, there will need to be significant change. A significant exclusion zone around the crater and visitors kept close to easily accessible purpose built permanent shelters?

 

My understanding is that until now the decision to visit or not visit on any given day has been in the hands of the tour operators. If tourists are still going to be able to go there, surely this will have to change - not sure who should have control but it needs to be an independent authority. Even the most responsible operator has a conflict of interest between revenue and customer safety.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


frednz
1467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 429
Inactive user


  #2374541 13-Dec-2019 08:38
Send private message

floydbloke:

 

Kia kaha and good luck to all those involved in the recovery mission today.  

 

 

Yes, I agree it's great to see this recovery mission is underway.

 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/12/white-island-eruption-live-updates-recovery-operation-to-go-ahead-despite-risk-of-eruption.html

 

GNS Science confirmed the volcano is becoming increasingly unstable, with a 50-60 percent chance of another eruption in the next 24 hours.

 

It's interesting that, although GNS predict that there's a 50-60% chance of another eruption in the next 24 hours, the above article says:

 

According to the most recent Geonet update, issued Thursday night, the alert level for White Island remains unchanged, at level 2. 

 

The alert level was also at Level 2 when tourists were still visiting the island.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
GV27
5977 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2374551 13-Dec-2019 09:05
Send private message

frednz:

 

According to the most recent Geonet update, issued Thursday night, the alert level for White Island remains unchanged, at level 2. 

 

The alert level was also at Level 2 when tourists were still visiting the island.

 

 

Again, from Geonet: 

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

https://www.geonet.org.nz/news/60xDrUB7wRZPZXyBa8xYwE


tdgeek
30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374556 13-Dec-2019 09:11
Send private message

frednz:

 

floydbloke:

 

Kia kaha and good luck to all those involved in the recovery mission today.  

 

 

Yes, I agree it's great to see this recovery mission is underway.

 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/12/white-island-eruption-live-updates-recovery-operation-to-go-ahead-despite-risk-of-eruption.html

 

GNS Science confirmed the volcano is becoming increasingly unstable, with a 50-60 percent chance of another eruption in the next 24 hours.

 

It's interesting that, although GNS predict that there's a 50-60% chance of another eruption in the next 24 hours, the above article says:

 

According to the most recent Geonet update, issued Thursday night, the alert level for White Island remains unchanged, at level 2. 

 

The alert level was also at Level 2 when tourists were still visiting the island.

 

 

Yess, thats my point all along. 1 is active and simmering, 2 is unstable, 3 is a small eruption is happening, 4 is medium eruption, 5 is large eruption. There is only one number that is viable.


frednz
1467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 429
Inactive user


  #2374560 13-Dec-2019 09:13
Send private message

GV27:

 

frednz:

 

According to the most recent Geonet update, issued Thursday night, the alert level for White Island remains unchanged, at level 2. 

 

The alert level was also at Level 2 when tourists were still visiting the island.

 

 

Again, from Geonet: 

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

https://www.geonet.org.nz/news/60xDrUB7wRZPZXyBa8xYwE

 

 

Yes, from the above:

 

For 11 and 12 December, eruption likelihoods have been calculated for a 24-hour time period. The table shows a large increase in eruption likelihoods over time.

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

So, it's good that eruption likelihoods are also published, and it seems that these are also an essential piece of information when deciding on whether to visit the island.


tdgeek
30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374562 13-Dec-2019 09:16
Send private message

GV27:

 

frednz:

 

According to the most recent Geonet update, issued Thursday night, the alert level for White Island remains unchanged, at level 2. 

 

The alert level was also at Level 2 when tourists were still visiting the island.

 

 

Again, from Geonet: 

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

https://www.geonet.org.nz/news/60xDrUB7wRZPZXyBa8xYwE

 

 

I dont see your point. Its an alert of activity not risk. The alert levels only contain physical parameters of the volcano. But you can easily extrapolate that to "an" alignment to risk levels without needing a Judge to decide foreseeability. 1 is simmering in the usual range of activity, 2 is unstable. Unstable, particularly for a volcano's crater which is where you are standing is a heightened risk of injury. Alert 2 also stated a heightened risk of an eruption. 

 

Fred is right as are you. But a layman can convert the alerts to risk


networkn
Networkn
32871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15464

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374565 13-Dec-2019 09:23
Send private message

Can someone explain to me, why they wouldn't wait till the status dropped to 1? Surely, overall, the risk is much less at 1 than 2, or 3?

 

It feels like "pressure" has meant they are heading out there earlier than they would, if the pressure wasn't being applied.

 

 


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
GV27
5977 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #2374567 13-Dec-2019 09:27
Send private message

frednz:

 

For 11 and 12 December, eruption likelihoods have been calculated for a 24-hour time period. The table shows a large increase in eruption likelihoods over time.

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

So, it's good that eruption likelihoods are also published, and it seems that these are also an essential piece of information when deciding on whether to visit the island.

 

 

Those metrics are going on in the background, but the most immediate piece of information, the alert level, is not a 'this thing is likely to pop' index like some people keep referring to it as.

 

It's a 2 until it is actually erupting.

 

There's a really neat thesis by one of the GNS scientists (Dr Sally Potter) that applied an alert system criteria to recent historic events in Taupo and charted what the alert level would have been had it been in place. It's here if you fancy a read. Also gives you an appreciation for how active Taupo has been in the past thirty years. Also gives a good breakdown of the issues with various ways of communicating unrest:

 

https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5654


dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2374571 13-Dec-2019 09:31
Send private message

networkn:

 

Can someone explain to me, why they wouldn't wait till the status dropped to 1? Surely, overall, the risk is much less at 1 than 2, or 3?

 

It feels like "pressure" has meant they are heading out there earlier than they would, if the pressure wasn't being applied.

 

 

The status may not change for days/weeks/years.

 

They are operating in the shadow of Pike River.

 

They will get in and out quickly and the affected families can begin closure.


tdgeek
30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374572 13-Dec-2019 09:36
Send private message

GV27:

 

frednz:

 

For 11 and 12 December, eruption likelihoods have been calculated for a 24-hour time period. The table shows a large increase in eruption likelihoods over time.

 

The Volcanic Alert Level is not linked directly to risk and likelihoods but describes the level of current volcanic activity.

 

So, it's good that eruption likelihoods are also published, and it seems that these are also an essential piece of information when deciding on whether to visit the island.

 

 

Those metrics are going on in the background, but the most immediate piece of information, the alert level, is not a 'this thing is likely to pop' index like some people keep referring to it as.

 

It's a 2 until it is actually erupting.

 

There's a really neat thesis by one of the GNS scientists (Dr Sally Potter) that applied an alert system criteria to recent historic events in Taupo and charted what the alert level would have been had it been in place. It's here if you fancy a read. Also gives you an appreciation for how active Taupo has been in the past thirty years. Also gives a good breakdown of the issues with various ways of communicating unrest:

 

https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5654

 

 

She does say that "Volcanic unrest is the key indicator of an impending eruption, enabling warnings to be disseminated, and risk to be reduced." Alert 2 was just that. Not an eruption prediction but a key indicator of an impending eruption. It might not happen, it may subside, but IMHO alert 2 is a no go time. Wait till it subsides if it does


tdgeek
30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2374575 13-Dec-2019 09:40
Send private message

dafman:

 

networkn:

 

Can someone explain to me, why they wouldn't wait till the status dropped to 1? Surely, overall, the risk is much less at 1 than 2, or 3?

 

It feels like "pressure" has meant they are heading out there earlier than they would, if the pressure wasn't being applied.

 

 

The status may not change for days/weeks/years.

 

They are operating in the shadow of Pike River.

 

They will get in and out quickly and the affected families can begin closure.

 

 

Inman thanked Ngāti Awa for the opportunity and the authorities for listening to the families of the deceased. 

 

Where is the safety of the recovery team? People are now back in harms way and there is no opportunity to save lives, they are already lost. 


1 | ... | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ... | 25
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.