|
|
|
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
andrew027:loceff13:mattwnz:
I did try putting through another order just now, and it now says the product isn't available for click and collect from the store I initially selected, but it is available for click and click from another store. But if that is the case, why don't they just move it between the stores, especially as they are the ones who made the error. It is poor management at the very least, resulting in poor customer service.
Because it's uneconomic to move it between stores(even in the same city) when they are already losing on it.
Which is probably why they charged me a $5 fee to ship the a6000 camera from Rotorua. I just hope they don't lock the doors for good before it gets here! Selfish, I know, but...
MikeB4: This is a process of cutting down the stock on hand valuation to make a purchase price more attractive to a potential buyer. It would not surprise me to read that the Dick Smith chain has been sold. A possible buyer could be David Jones?
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
mattwnz:andrew027:loceff13:mattwnz:
I did try putting through another order just now, and it now says the product isn't available for click and collect from the store I initially selected, but it is available for click and click from another store. But if that is the case, why don't they just move it between the stores, especially as they are the ones who made the error. It is poor management at the very least, resulting in poor customer service.
Because it's uneconomic to move it between stores(even in the same city) when they are already losing on it.
Which is probably why they charged me a $5 fee to ship the a6000 camera from Rotorua. I just hope they don't lock the doors for good before it gets here! Selfish, I know, but...
It's not selfish, you don't want to be out of pocket, and often when a store goes under, it is the consumer that is also out of pocket, such as with gift vouchers. I would pay by credit card so you have some protection
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
richms: Those figures are provided by accountants. One step below lawyers.
andrew027:
Payment definitely by credit card, but much as I want this camera (and was close to paying more than twice as much for it) it seems less important than a few hundred people being laid off just before Christmas.
Meanwhile, at Dick Smith's in Australia, as well as losing money they're losing sympathy.
richms: Those figures are provided by accountants. One step below lawyers.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
eracode:MikeB4: This is a process of cutting down the stock on hand valuation to make a purchase price more attractive to a potential buyer. It would not surprise me to read that the Dick Smith chain has been sold. A possible buyer could be David Jones?
It's a listed company - can really only be sold if a purchaser makes a stand in the market and/or announces a takeover bid. i.e. It can't be sold without the public shareholders' knowledge/acceptance of the share price offered.
eracode:MikeB4: This is a process of cutting down the stock on hand valuation to make a purchase price more attractive to a potential buyer. It would not surprise me to read that the Dick Smith chain has been sold. A possible buyer could be David Jones?
It's a listed company - can really only be sold if a purchaser makes a stand in the market and/or announces a takeover bid. i.e. It can't be sold without the public shareholders' knowledge/acceptance of the share price offered.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
MikeB4:eracode:MikeB4: This is a process of cutting down the stock on hand valuation to make a purchase price more attractive to a potential buyer. It would not surprise me to read that the Dick Smith chain has been sold. A possible buyer could be David Jones?
It's a listed company - can really only be sold if a purchaser makes a stand in the market and/or announces a takeover bid. i.e. It can't be sold without the public shareholders' knowledge/acceptance of the share price offered.
Anchorage were at one point 98% stock holders, that will of course be diluted by the float. I am not sure what percentage was floated however Anchorage hold a large percentage, that could be sold in an off market deal, the balance then picked up on the market.Off course this would have to be made
public and the Exchange advised prior.
Fred99:MikeB4:eracode:MikeB4: This is a process of cutting down the stock on hand valuation to make a purchase price more attractive to a potential buyer. It would not surprise me to read that the Dick Smith chain has been sold. A possible buyer could be David Jones?
It's a listed company - can really only be sold if a purchaser makes a stand in the market and/or announces a takeover bid. i.e. It can't be sold without the public shareholders' knowledge/acceptance of the share price offered.
Anchorage were at one point 98% stock holders, that will of course be diluted by the float. I am not sure what percentage was floated however Anchorage hold a large percentage, that could be sold in an off market deal, the balance then picked up on the market.Off course this would have to be made
public and the Exchange advised prior.
Dick Smith was bought from Woolworths by Anchorage Partners in late 2012 for A$74 million and floated a year later with a valuation of A$345 million. About a year after that Anchorage sold its remaining 20 per cent in the company.
One would hope that ASIC is taking a long hard look at what happened there.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
|
|
|