|
|
|
MrMistofeles:
If you don't see this you are running the gauntlet of bigotry. If you're ok with that then so am I.
tardtasticx:nakedmolerat:NZtechfreak: I will merely leave some food for thought: when basically nobody agrees with your point of view, I think it is time to reflect on your point of view.
Honestly this does not mean anything. Just because many people disagree with you, it does not make you wrong.
OP is fully entitled to his opinion. Unfortunately, homosexual issue is deem sacred.
Well peoples opinions need to stop when they start attacking the human rights of others.
Glassboy:tardtasticx:nakedmolerat:NZtechfreak: I will merely leave some food for thought: when basically nobody agrees with your point of view, I think it is time to reflect on your point of view.
Honestly this does not mean anything. Just because many people disagree with you, it does not make you wrong.
OP is fully entitled to his opinion. Unfortunately, homosexual issue is deem sacred.
Well peoples opinions need to stop when they start attacking the human rights of others.
I get the sense you don't know what a human right is. Coincidently this popped up on Kiwiblog the other day http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/07/human_rights_and_civil_rights.html
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a16 - Article 16, Section 1:
Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
surfisup1000:MrMistofeles:
If you don't see this you are running the gauntlet of bigotry. If you're ok with that then so am I.
The bigot word comes out.
Come on mods, sort out the name calling!!
It is in the FUG! Or , is name calling allowed sometimes?
Demeter: I'm astounded at the level of moral outrage in this thread, since I can't for the life of me see where in this thread anybody's human rights (civil or otherwise) were transgressed or where it was suggested that marrying whomever you choose, regardless of their gender, is wrong.
Demeter: I'm astounded at the level of moral outrage in this thread, since I can't for the life of me see where in this thread anybody's human rights (civil or otherwise) were transgressed or where it was suggested that marrying whomever you choose, regardless of their gender, is wrong.
surfisup1000:MrMistofeles:
If you don't see this you are running the gauntlet of bigotry. If you're ok with that then so am I.
The bigot word comes out.
Come on mods, sort out the name calling!!
It is in the FUG! Or , is name calling allowed sometimes?
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
tardtasticx:Glassboy:
I get the sense you don't know what a human right is. Coincidently this popped up on Kiwiblog the other day http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/07/human_rights_and_civil_rights.html
Pretty sure I'd trust the United Nations website more than KiwiBlog. So yeah I think I do know. It was also the first link on Google.
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a16 - Article 16, Section 1:Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
Glassboy:tardtasticx:Glassboy:
I get the sense you don't know what a human right is. Coincidently this popped up on Kiwiblog the other day http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/07/human_rights_and_civil_rights.html
Pretty sure I'd trust the United Nations website more than KiwiBlog. So yeah I think I do know. It was also the first link on Google.
It's a summary of a speech given the Australian human rights commissioner. So yeah you can be sanctimonious or actually gain some knowledge beyond having Google think for you.
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a16 - Article 16, Section 1:Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
You know I didn't get that you were talking about people's right to be married. I actually though you might be talking about the OP's right to make a fool of himself. I'm not sure where anyone was saying that people aren't allowed to marry.
tardtasticx:
My previous post, 3 up from your last one, explains it.
Glassboy:tardtasticx:
My previous post, 3 up from your last one, explains it.
Nah not really. You're assigning your own "meaning" to what others are saying and constructing a straw man.
Glassboy: Your entire argument runs counter to Article 19 of the UDHR. The UDHR is also only relevant to the degree to which NZ has signed up to it, and that generally is expressed in the BORA 1990, and you by telling other people what they think and whether they are allowed to think it contravenes both the Freedom of thought, conscience, and expression and the Freedom of expression.
|
|
|