Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 12
Kyanar
4089 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1684

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3136694 29-Sep-2023 19:56
Send private message

ezbee:

 

Do they still own a major paint company as well? Somewhere its said they own 23 companies.

 

 

I can only find four companies - though that's just the ones I can direct link down from the Australasian Conference Association or New Zealand Conference Association. One of their companies is a trustee, so I'd assume that means there's a trust that could be hiding who knows how many other companies.




jonathan18
7415 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2850

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3136697 29-Sep-2023 20:02
Send private message

All this talk of supermarket competition is distracting from the key topic: I may be casting a last-minute vote on this but it’s definitely 10 ticks for Vegemite from me; specifically the low-salt version, which is actually pretty close to the original. (As opposed to the gluten-free version - someone in the family accidentally bought that; it’s pretty gross.)

As it happens, we did a taste comparison between Vegemite and Marmite this morning as our Air BnB has it and we’d brought the real stuff with us - I was easily able to tell which was which in a blind tasting, and definitely preferred the former…

gzt

gzt
18685 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7826

Lifetime subscriber

  #3136698 29-Sep-2023 20:03
Send private message

SATTV: Me too, except for Marmite, I have not found a suitable replacement.

$7.20 for 500gms Marmite at paknsave. That had me thinking. Unfortunately it's $8.20 at The Warehouse today apparently.



rscole86
4999 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 462

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3136699 29-Sep-2023 20:04
Send private message

Kyanar:

ezbee:


Do they still own a major paint company as well? Somewhere its said they own 23 companies.



I can only find four companies - though that's just the ones I can direct link down from the Australasian Conference Association or New Zealand Conference Association. One of their companies is a trustee, so I'd assume that means there's a trust that could be hiding who knows how many other companies.



Second Google result, then follow your nose.
https://register.charities.govt.nz/CharitiesRegister/ViewCharity?accountId=494b24a9-791c-dd11-99cd-0015c5f3da29

gzt

gzt
18685 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7826

Lifetime subscriber

  #3136701 29-Sep-2023 20:09
Send private message

jonathan18: As it happens, we did a taste comparison between Vegemite and Marmite this morning as our Air BnB has it and we’d brought the real stuff with us - I was easily able to tell which was which in a blind tasting, and definitely preferred the former…

Vegemite has less sugar. I prefer it. I find I get habituated to either one and reject the other one. A jar used to last me a year. Kids..

jonathan18
7415 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2850

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3136703 29-Sep-2023 20:11
Send private message

gzt:
jonathan18: As it happens, we did a taste comparison between Vegemite and Marmite this morning as our Air BnB has it and we’d brought the real stuff with us - I was easily able to tell which was which in a blind tasting, and definitely preferred the former…

Vegemite has less sugar. I prefer it. I find I get habituated to either one and reject the other one. A jar used to last me a year. Kids..

Yep, it was the distinct sweetness of Marmite that immediately gave it away. I’m sure you’re right about it being relatively easy to get used to either one - but now I need to watch my salt intake it’s definitely Vegemite for me!

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

gzt

gzt
18685 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7826

Lifetime subscriber

  #3136704 29-Sep-2023 20:24
Send private message

evilengineer: There's only one true Marmite. And it ain't the one from New Zealand.Real Marmite from the UK,please..

Where do you buy that?

Handle9
11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9680

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3136705 29-Sep-2023 20:29
Send private message

gzt:
evilengineer: There's only one true Marmite. And it ain't the one from New Zealand.Real Marmite from the UK,please..

Where do you buy that?

 

From the rubbish bin. It's the devils spread.


ezbee
2657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3098


  #3136707 29-Sep-2023 20:49
Send private message


It might have been Brethern who seem to have big focus on business. 
Though some/many may not be directly able to be registered as charities their donations to chuch etc probably are deducted.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2022/07/former-exclusive-brethren-members-detail-complete-control-massive-buying-power-of-cult-like-church.html

 

It was a few decades ago and with international companies buying out NZ business may no longer apply.


mattwnz
20520 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4797


  #3136715 29-Sep-2023 21:25
Send private message

Handle9:
mattwnz: But the Government should have done far more than just appoint a grocery commissioner.


What exactly did you want them to do?


The Commerce Commission had a whole lot of recommendations for the government to follow.

yitz
2239 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 594


  #3136716 29-Sep-2023 21:30
Send private message

raytaylor:

 

What I hope is actually going down.... 

 

4) Sanitarium doing good for consumers: Something within 1 and 2 is happening where Sanitarium feels they are getting shafted by the supermarkets and decided this was the best path to get the commerce commission involved, bypassing a non-disclosure agreement to get the supermarket terms of trade made public so politicians have some ammunition for the upcoming election. 

 

 

Was wondering this myself as newly appointed grocery commissioner is ex-Sanitarium ... bureaucrat justifying their role before public service agency cuts.


 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
Eitsop
584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153

ID Verified

  #3136717 29-Sep-2023 21:32
Send private message

I would like to know what benefits the get as a charity, feels like tax avoidance benefitting individuals 


Qazzy03
546 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 492


  #3136719 29-Sep-2023 21:36
Send private message

Eitsop:

 

I would like to know what benefits the get as a charity, feels like tax avoidance benefitting individuals 

 

 

It just means that profit gets put towards their church rather than benefitting individuals 'income'.

 

Remember people can care more about $$$ and having more $$$ to put towards your church and what the church wants to archive is a pretty big benefit. 


Handle9
11927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9680

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3136722 29-Sep-2023 21:52
Send private message

mattwnz:
Handle9:

What exactly did you want them to do?


The Commerce Commission had a whole lot of recommendations for the government to follow.


12 of the 14 recommendations are implemented or are being implemented.

What specifically should the government be doing that they are not?

SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3136723 29-Sep-2023 22:05
Send private message

raytaylor:

 

So I am thinking one of four things would have happened    

 

1) Sanitarium rents shelf space at supermarkets.   
This is the model where a food producer can rent shelf space, then pay the supermarket to provide services such as checkout, cash handling, shelf refilling, distribution etc. Some companies rent shelf space and do their own shelf stocking etc or use only some of the supermarket services and then provide their own staff for other services. Sometimes you will see staff from companies like Coca Cola working in the supermarket restocking shelves rather than the supermarket staff.   

In this case, sanitarium wont want to leave those shelves empty that they are paying for - and the supermarket will have requirements for shelves to be kept stocked because they advertise their foot traffic walking past the shelf space as a feature to potential tenants.
Anything driving foot traffic away is bad for the supermarket when setting their shelf lease prices. 

 

 

 

2) Sanitarium has a supply requirement and potential penalties if they cant supply. 
The supermarket is buying product, adding a markup and then selling it - just like how we imagine any standard retailer to operate.    
The supermarket may have an agreement in place where they will pay a certain price for the product and Sanitarium is required to keep shelves stocked.    

 

3) No one likes selling to The Warehouse like Mitre10 - just a pain in the ass to deal with as a customer. The supermarket pays more for the product or is easier to deal with and sanitarium can make more money via supermarkets when allocating their limited output.    

 

   

 

What I hope is actually going down.... 

 

4) Sanitarium doing good for consumers: Something within 1 and 2 is happening where Sanitarium feels they are getting shafted by the supermarkets and decided this was the best path to get the commerce commission involved, bypassing a non-disclosure agreement to get the supermarket terms of trade made public so politicians have some ammunition for the upcoming election. 

 

 

The question with contractual and even "they're a pain" considerations is of course - is that reasonable?

 

Plenty of companies love to hide behind "it's in the T&Cs" and "we put it in a contract". That might be true - but it doesn't make it legal nor reasonable. The lawsuits involving Intel paying Dell 'rebates' for not selling computers with AMD processors are still rolling around. Employers get done on a semi-regular basis for contracts paying below minimum wage or illegally stating certain time (e.g. "pre-start meetings") will be unpaid.

 

 

 

So the question is whether offering or signing contracts with such terms is anti-competitive. And whether there's a "gentleman's agreement" that if there are supply shortages, the major players have first dibs and/or compete together for volume.

 

 

 

As for the tax question? I think it should be considered as two separate parts.

 

Where you collect tax is a zero sum game. If one company/industry/person pays less, everyone else has to pick up the tab. By granting or campaigning for tax exemptions, you're punishing others. When those people are running a prominent, successful business? They're inherently the primary target for reasonable taxation.

 

Separately, consider separately whether the total tax take, both in dollar terms and as a proportion of GDP or other metrics, should be adjusted. 

 

Any cuts are going to be just that - cuts. Politicians always make promises to cut fat and never really manage to.

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 12
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.