KrazyKid:
Yes they individually contribute a little bit only in each place, there is a quality in numbers all of its own as the saying goes.
some figures I found puts the average spend of backpackers at $3,700 and the average stay at 31 days.
So a bit over $100 a day spend each.
But the number of backpackers per year was quoted at 159,000. That's $600 million a year.
so while it would be nice to get more big spending tourists, backpackers are good.
I assume camper vans are a subset of all backpackers, but are basically in the same spend bracket (vans instead of hostels)
I think it is worth having a discussion about these numbers and whether it is a market we should be chasing. $600m a year in the scheme of things is not a huge amount. If you assumed a very basic 15% GST going to the government, that's less than $18 per person per day of tax going to the government. Generally nothing goes to the ratepayer, who usually has to pay for the facilities a backpacker may use as well as upkeep (i.e public toilets).
Looking at the Premium section of that website:
Tourism New Zealand considers that the biggest growth opportunities exist with the top 10 per cent of the world's wealthy - the Very and Ultra High Net-Worth Individuals (VHNWI and UHNWI) with liquid assets of US$30m plus. Travellers in this segment can spend $50k per visit, with some capable of spending $100k or more. (*source: 2013 World Wealth Report)
1 person spending $3,700 over 31 days vs 1 person spending up to $100,000 over a shorter period. Obviously we don't want to end up as some inaccessible ultra-wealthy only tourist destination but at the same time we are already creaking with the numbers of low-value backpackers.




