Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


kingdragonfly

11984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12867

Subscriber

#215190 16-Jun-2017 10:15
Send private message


The "Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy" / "DairyGood" has published the result of 1,000 survey of Americans.

7% believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows.

While that's funny, their web page about adding sugar to milk is misleading, by paltering: using truthful statements to lead a listener to a false conclusion

"While some have concerns about sweeteners in milk, leading health and nutrition organizations have recognized that the small amounts of added sugars that can be used in nutrient-dense foods, like chocolate milk. For some people, the calories from sugar in flavored milk are a worthwhile trade-off for all of the nutrients milk provides.

In fact, dairy companies have come together to lower sugars in flavored milk available in schools by 38 percent. This lower-sugar, fat-free option has an average of 134 calories per 8 oz., which is only about 30 more calories than white milk."

https://dairygood.org/Content/2014/4-Chocolate-Milk-Myths-Busted

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1801979 16-Jun-2017 10:35
Send private message

Don't look at the amount of sugar in Lewis Road chocolate milk...!

 

 

 

When I was studying rural land management, I recall a survey in the UK that showed that urban kids actually believed cows produced milk in tetrapaks.








Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1801981 16-Jun-2017 10:38
Send private message

There's now some arguments that whole milk may be better for you than low fat.  Correlation only, possible mechanism that some nutrients in milk are fat soluble, that the ratio of sugar:fat (even though that may be lactose - not added sucrose in flavoured milk etc) contributes to obesity etc.  The apparent flaw in many of the population studies is the same flaw that appears in studies suggesting negative outcomes / higher mortality through use of artificial sweeteners.  They conveniently ignore the fact that of the population using artificial sweeteners, some larger % are diabetic, obese already and have reason to reduce sugar consumption (the hope to avoid the negative health outcome they're being told they're going to get) - or do things I've seen so many times - have a donut or big slab of sweet cake with their coffee - then bung artificial sweetener in their coffee "because they need to diet".

 

Who knows?  Reducing added sugar intake is a no-brainer, but consuming massive quantities of saturated fats just because it seems they aren't as harmful as once thought may be a serious mistake.

 

Almost all industry-funded food studies truly suck - and media reporting on them is shamefully inadequate.


Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #1802008 16-Jun-2017 11:11
Send private message

 

 

Geektastic:

 

Don't look at the amount of sugar in Lewis Road chocolate milk...!

 

 

I assume there is a lot. That's probably why it tastes so much better.

 

But I actually prefer the double caramel one. I haven't looked to know for sure, but it tastes like it would have even more sugar than the chocolate one.




Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1802012 16-Jun-2017 11:14
Send private message

You can't beat Puhoi Half & Half...!!

 

 

 

The funny thing is that full fat milk is still accurately describable as "95% fat free". I would think that, unless you drink pints of the stuff every day, bothering with skimmed or semi-skimmed is a waste of time really, considering that they both taste worse (especially skimmed, which tastes like white water).






floydbloke
3646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4554

ID Verified

  #1802063 16-Jun-2017 11:38
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

....

 

The funny thing is that full fat milk is still accurately describable as "95% fat free"....

 

 

I'm about to go and have my weekly Mee Goreng from Chummeez on Lambton Quay.  I haven't asked them for nutritional information but I'm sure that fellow Geekzoners who have partaken in this delicacy will agree it's at lest 47% fat-free.





Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.


MikeAqua
8024 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3817


  #1802087 16-Jun-2017 12:15
Send private message

"I'll have two big macs, large fries, chicken nuggets, an apple pie and a diet coke please".





Mike


 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).
nathan
5695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1630
Inactive user


  #1802088 16-Jun-2017 12:23
Send private message

humans aren't designed to food that has had its fat artificially removed


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

  #1802091 16-Jun-2017 12:33
Send private message

Fred99:

 

There's now some arguments that whole milk may be better for you than low fat.  Correlation only, possible mechanism that some nutrients in milk are fat soluble, that the ratio of sugar:fat (even though that may be lactose - not added sucrose in flavoured milk etc) contributes to obesity etc.  The apparent flaw in many of the population studies is the same flaw that appears in studies suggesting negative outcomes / higher mortality through use of artificial sweeteners.  They conveniently ignore the fact that of the population using artificial sweeteners, some larger % are diabetic, obese already and have reason to reduce sugar consumption (the hope to avoid the negative health outcome they're being told they're going to get) - or do things I've seen so many times - have a donut or big slab of sweet cake with their coffee - then bung artificial sweetener in their coffee "because they need to diet".

 

Who knows?  Reducing added sugar intake is a no-brainer, but consuming massive quantities of saturated fats just because it seems they aren't as harmful as once thought may be a serious mistake.

 

Almost all industry-funded food studies truly suck - and media reporting on them is shamefully inadequate.

 

 

Media reporting on everything here seems shamefully inadequate. Nearly every article I see is just a regurgitated press release. I can't recall the last time I saw a critical report on anything. I don't think today's 'journalists' are even capable of critical thinking. I have to wonder what they are actually taught in journalism school.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1802096 16-Jun-2017 12:39
Send private message

do red Apples come from red trees?  Do blue Holden Sparks come from blue Holden Colorado Utes?





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1802100 16-Jun-2017 12:45
Send private message

floydbloke:

 

Geektastic:

 

....

 

The funny thing is that full fat milk is still accurately describable as "95% fat free"....

 

 

I'm about to go and have my weekly Mee Goreng from Chummeez on Lambton Quay.  I haven't asked them for nutritional information but I'm sure that fellow Geekzoners who have partaken in this delicacy will agree it's at lest 47% fat-free.

 

 


Haven't been there for ages - is it still good? I used to meet my wife there for lunch when I worked at the DIA.






Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1802102 16-Jun-2017 12:46
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

"I'll have two big macs, large fries, chicken nuggets, an apple pie and a diet coke please".

 

 

 

 

Quite so.






 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1802104 16-Jun-2017 12:48
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

floydbloke:

 

Geektastic:

 

....

 

The funny thing is that full fat milk is still accurately describable as "95% fat free"....

 

 

I'm about to go and have my weekly Mee Goreng from Chummeez on Lambton Quay.  I haven't asked them for nutritional information but I'm sure that fellow Geekzoners who have partaken in this delicacy will agree it's at lest 47% fat-free.

 

 


Haven't been there for ages - is it still good? I used to meet my wife there for lunch when I worked at the DIA.

 

 

 

 

I used to go to Mo's in Bowen State and to splash out go to the Ministry of Food at the same locale tongue-out





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

  #1802109 16-Jun-2017 13:20
Send private message

Actually, chocolate milk does come from brown cows. You just have to use the right end.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


nathan
5695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1630
Inactive user


  #1802131 16-Jun-2017 13:58
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Fred99:

 

There's now some arguments that whole milk may be better for you than low fat.  Correlation only, possible mechanism that some nutrients in milk are fat soluble, that the ratio of sugar:fat (even though that may be lactose - not added sucrose in flavoured milk etc) contributes to obesity etc.  The apparent flaw in many of the population studies is the same flaw that appears in studies suggesting negative outcomes / higher mortality through use of artificial sweeteners.  They conveniently ignore the fact that of the population using artificial sweeteners, some larger % are diabetic, obese already and have reason to reduce sugar consumption (the hope to avoid the negative health outcome they're being told they're going to get) - or do things I've seen so many times - have a donut or big slab of sweet cake with their coffee - then bung artificial sweetener in their coffee "because they need to diet".

 

Who knows?  Reducing added sugar intake is a no-brainer, but consuming massive quantities of saturated fats just because it seems they aren't as harmful as once thought may be a serious mistake.

 

Almost all industry-funded food studies truly suck - and media reporting on them is shamefully inadequate.

 

 

Media reporting on everything here seems shamefully inadequate. Nearly every article I see is just a regurgitated press release. I can't recall the last time I saw a critical report on anything. I don't think today's 'journalists' are even capable of critical thinking. I have to wonder what they are actually taught in journalism school.

 

 

 

 

quality of journalists is a reflection of how much their audience is prepared to pay.

 

Read the NBR sometime for quality critical reporting (yes its behind a paywall)


linw
2893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1205


  #1802135 16-Jun-2017 14:10
Send private message

Put bad journalists together with scientists trying to bolster their case for funding and you get what we see.

 

There seem to be very few people left who still hold that correlation tells us nothing about causation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.