![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.
Andy Ghozali ![]() | E: andy@ghozali.ru M: +64 21 395 458 A: Andy's Business Services, 231 High St, Christchurch 8011, NZ |
www.andy.mobi | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
JamesL: I'm not bothered to even check.
Battery life and performance is infinitely better than my Nexus 5 so it makes no difference what it has
sep11guy:
apple has confirmed chipgate
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2015/10/09/apple-reply-a9-battery-life-samsung-tsmc-iphone-6s/
and there are 3 ios issues :
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/10/09/apple-ios-9-0-2-three-more-problems/
dejadeadnz:sep11guy:
apple has confirmed chipgate
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2015/10/09/apple-reply-a9-battery-life-samsung-tsmc-iphone-6s/
and there are 3 ios issues :
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/10/09/apple-ios-9-0-2-three-more-problems/
Have you heard of the concepts of statistically insignificant difference or margin of error?
dejadeadnz: Look, this is coming from a person who is actually concerned by this issue also but it's just silly to keep harping on about some Geekbench test that runs the CPU at maximum load/near maximum load and then saying "See, the Samsung chip performs much worse". Even if all this is literally true, SO WHAT? No one runs their phone at maximum load for hours on end.
"Tests are coming in"? They aren't coming in. People already have seen those silly Geekbench tests. If you are going to slag off a company, at least get your facts straight.
dejadeadnz: Umm no. I actually have on here made pretty harsh comments about Apple. How about your actually address the issues I have raised instead of doing stupid name calling? Or are you just a troll?
nate: Alright, had a few reports of this thread, please keep the personal attacks out, if you can't keep this civil we'll have to lock this thread.
Thanks.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |