![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
HTPC Intel Pentium G3258 cpu, Gigabyte H97n-wifi motherboard, , 8GB DDR3 ram, onboard graphics. Hauppuage HVR 5500 tuner, Silverstone LC16M case, Windows 10 pro 64 bit using Nextpvr and Kodi
Foo: Does this link seem a fair representation of your experience(s) of battery usage on the Sensation? I realise that it's been updated, but keen on thoughts.
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/htc-sensation-943466/review?artc_pg=9
Gilco2: well after updating phone software to 1.35.707.1 the phone seems to be behaving. However it is still slower than my desirehd and battery doesnt last anywhere near as long. I cant get a day out of it and there is just idle not doing anything. Then it takes 6 to 8 hours to charge depending how flat it is.
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.
Gilco2: well after updating phone software to 1.35.707.1 the phone seems to be behaving. However it is still slower than my desirehd and battery doesnt last anywhere near as long. I cant get a day out of it and there is just idle not doing anything. Then it takes 6 to 8 hours to charge depending how flat it is.
Gilco2: well after updating phone software to 1.35.707.1 the phone seems to be behaving. However it is still slower than my desirehd and battery doesnt last anywhere near as long. I cant get a day out of it and there is just idle not doing anything. Then it takes 6 to 8 hours to charge depending how flat it is.
ArtooDetoo:
It's going to depend on how you use it, that's for sure.
Unless I'm hammering it (shooting video and playing it back. playing audio continuously, shooting and viewing stills etc), the battery is lasting all day. It's going on charge in the evening (11pm-ish) and back on battery around 7am each day. There are times when it doesn't make it, normally when I'm heavily testing for instance, but with my 'normal' use, it's getting through the day until bedtime. That's probably what you'd expect of a dual core phone running at 1.2GHz with a 960x540 display and a battery the same capacity as you'd find on a phone with a single core, running slower and with a smaller display.
Which brings up a salient point - why is the Sensation's battery not a larger capacity? The aftermarket will no doubt take care of that need, but HTC could do well to make it available.
Your link reveals that the original hardware tested had a higher power consumption than the later model that they received, the latter getting through the day with 30% remaining. So I'd say "yes" to your original question that the replacement Sensation's performance certainly fairly represents my experience.
Unless I'm caning it of course. :-)
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
lokhor: @Foo - what do you think of Sense UI?
Foo: The main reason I started using Launcher Pro was to fit more icons onto screens and I think I noticed a bit of a speed boast.
Foo:lokhor: @Foo - what do you think of Sense UI?
I immediately want to say that I quite like it, however I do use Launcher Pro, so I guess I lose a lot of the Sense functionality due to this.
The main reason I started using Launcher Pro was to fit more icons onto screens and I think I noticed a bit of a speed boast.
I've had a play with the Samsung Galaxy and have to say I don't really like it, but from everything I've read, the SGS II is far and away superior. Once again, using a different launcher might help in that regard.
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.
lokhor:
I used Launcher Pro on my SGS and really liked it a lot better than TouchWiz. So far with the HTC Sensation I've tried Launcher Pro once and ended up going back to Sense. Did you read my post on Sense UI 3.0?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |