|
|
|
greenbone: got a callback from Reece plumbing; their advice is a dual check valve with 25mm air break, p# 104553, rrp $48.50+gst. think i will proceed
greenbone: link to the product if anyone is interested
farcus:greenbone: link to the product if anyone is interested
wouldn't something like this be much better?
hand held seems a bit yuk!
nakedmolerat:farcus:greenbone: link to the product if anyone is interested
wouldn't something like this be much better?
hand held seems a bit yuk!
No! No!
Have you used one? They have this in one of the 5 star hotel I stayed. I don't like it. Handheld is much better.
greenbone: thanks for replies
Aredwood, lets say for a second, purely theoretically, that compliance and legalities dont exist ...
would you personally trust a check valve fitted between the cistern tap and bitdet attachment to prevent backwater contamination in 99% of cases?
greenbone: got a callback from Reece plumbing; their advice is a dual check valve with 25mm air break, p# 104553, rrp $48.50+gst. think i will proceed
oxnsox: Alternatively you could take the hand unit feed from the toilet header tank (which by default provides the required seperation). A simple partion in the tank would ensure you retained a separate supply that woulnt be used in the flush.
And you probably wouldn't need a plumber to do it legally.
The idea of touching something that a previous person had been handling and holding inside the toilet just after they have finished their business would have me breaking out in a cold sweat!!!
nakedmolerat: It is a known fact that phone is dirtier than toilet seat!
http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/3948311/
andrewNZ: There was a case quite a few years back where (I think) a dairy factory managed to back feed the town supply with cleaning solution. Burned quite a few people from memory.
|
|
|