Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


concordnz

492 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 277

Trusted
EMT (R)

#269694 2-Apr-2020 17:48
Send private message

Hi, 

 

I have $1000+ in flights booked over Easter, which AirNZ have Cancelled, 

 

They are refusing to offer a Refund, (just a 'credit for use in the next 12 months') -

Of which I have no use for, and as they have not provided the services, for which I paid, 
As I paid via Credit Card, I would suspect, I have some grounds for Requesting a charge back(refund) from the Bank, via the Credit Card.

 

 

 

Does anyone have experience in this process, and know what the requirements are to get a Refund via the C/card?  
(There is going to be a lot of people in this situation, - with Air NZ refusing to provide Refunds, - even know they have not provided the services, they were contracted to provide.)



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

dejadeadnz
2394 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2453343 2-Apr-2020 21:11
Send private message

There's very unlikely to be a CGA claim available as this is not a case where the airline has failed to meet the required guarantees in respect of supply of services. @SirHumphreyAppleby is on the best track so far. The ordinary legal principles that govern such a situation is the legal doctrine of frustration and this has been encapsulated in s 60 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017. The most relevant remedy is s 61(1), which mirrors the common law doctrine of money had and received for cases where one party receives money to perform a contract that now cannot be performed for reasons that are not the fault of either party. Under traditional common law, I'd argue that both parties have been discharged from the contract and the OP is entitled to a refund under the doctrine of frustration but his rights may also be tempered by international instruments like the Montreal Convention, which has the force of domestic law by virtue of the Civil Aviation Act. In some cases, the Convention (as confirmed by High Court precedents) absolutely overrides provisions of the CGA but I don't know enough about aviation law to know whether it does here.

 

If the OP is unhappy, once things open up, take a case to the DT if you don't get a satisfactory outcome from your perspective. At the end of the day, only the judicial systems' opinion count and as presumably the only real lawyer in this thread (taking legal advice from certain characters who have posted in this thread would be most unwise if you are aware of their history and general attitudes towards consumer rights), even I am not 100% sure as to your rights in these rather unique circumstances.

 

Best of luck.

 

Edit: Left out "CGA" in the first sentence.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.