Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | ... | 268
Aredwood
3885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1749


  #1992453 10-Apr-2018 02:19

Pumpedd:

It is true that the last government gave vastly more (in %GDP terms) to health than Labour ever has and what is clear Labour seems intent on not changing that. Lucky lucky students.



Curious as to why students in particular benefit from more health spending. Are you referring to medical students in particular?







MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12769

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1992518 10-Apr-2018 09:02
Send private message

Some are predicting a not so good budget from the Coalition. It seems to me that when ever Labour is in Government things  always start as gloomy and bad. I swear they need to get repeats for their antidepressants. 





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


Pumpedd
1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 887
Inactive user


  #1992526 10-Apr-2018 09:14
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Some are predicting a not so good budget from the Coalition. It seems to me that when ever Labour is in Government things  always start as gloomy and bad. I swear they need to get repeats for their antidepressants. 

 

 

If things are so gloomy why was so much spending done in the first 3 months of their term outside of budget. The 4 billion given to Jones to spend among  his friends seems almost criminal with the books as gloomy as Adern is predicting.




6FIEND
774 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 589
Inactive user


  #1992543 10-Apr-2018 09:40
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

It is true that the last government gave vastly more (in %GDP terms) to health than Labour ever has and what is clear Labour seems intent on not changing that. Lucky lucky students.

 

 

 

 

Actually, in %GDP terms, I believe that the Health funding dropped.

 

ie. The Health Budget grew in absolute terms.  (And in "adjusted for inflation" and "population growth" terms)  ...but the Economy as a whole grew at a faster rate.


MikeB4
MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12769

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1992544 10-Apr-2018 09:40
Send private message

Pumpedd:

MikeB4:


Some are predicting a not so good budget from the Coalition. It seems to me that when ever Labour is in Government things  always start as gloomy and bad. I swear they need to get repeats for their antidepressants. 



If things are so gloomy why was so much spending done in the first 3 months of their term outside of budget. The 4 billion given to Jones to spend among  his friends seems almost criminal with the books as gloomy as Adern is predicting.



Regional development is very important and so often neglected. Developing the regions will take pressure off the urban centres.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


6FIEND
774 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 589
Inactive user


  #1992546 10-Apr-2018 09:43
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Some are predicting a not so good budget from the Coalition. It seems to me that when ever Labour is in Government things  always start as gloomy and bad. I swear they need to get repeats for their antidepressants. 

 

 

 

 

Funniest thing I read about this today...

 

@Mike_Smith_NZ:

 

So, let me get this right, pre-election National say that there is a shortfall in Labour's budget.  Which Labour deny... Post election Labour say, "We have a shortfall in our budget, and it's National's fault" - facepalm

 


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

  #1992550 10-Apr-2018 09:48
Send private message

Is that opinion or fact?

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Reciprocity
169 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 97
Inactive user


  #1992560 10-Apr-2018 10:00
Send private message

6FIEND:

gzt: Where to look for these rumors?

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=jacinda+ardern+rumors

Nope ; )


 


Firstly, look at the bolded statement above, rather than the PM herself.


Beyond that, it's not the kind of thing that you're likely to find on Google anyway... Some of it may be subject to name suppression, and some of it may be pure fabrication, so I'm not going perpetuate any of that here.  But, again, despite my opinion of Ardern's suitability for her role and her performance to date - I hope that none of it is true.



Name suppression you say?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11768598

mrfte
83 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32


  #1992564 10-Apr-2018 10:04
Send private message

6FIEND:

 

MikeB4:

 

Some are predicting a not so good budget from the Coalition. It seems to me that when ever Labour is in Government things  always start as gloomy and bad. I swear they need to get repeats for their antidepressants. 

 

 

 

 

Funniest thing I read about this today...

 

@Mike_Smith_NZ:

 

So, let me get this right, pre-election National say that there is a shortfall in Labour's budget.  Which Labour deny... Post election Labour say, "We have a shortfall in our budget, and it's National's fault" - facepalm

 

 

 

 

 

Robertson himself said National left the books in good order.. lol


GV27
5978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4212


  #1992565 10-Apr-2018 10:06
Send private message

6FIEND:

 

Pumpedd:

 

It is true that the last government gave vastly more (in %GDP terms) to health than Labour ever has and what is clear Labour seems intent on not changing that. Lucky lucky students.

 

 

Actually, in %GDP terms, I believe that the Health funding dropped.

 

ie. The Health Budget grew in absolute terms.  (And in "adjusted for inflation" and "population growth" terms)  ...but the Economy as a whole grew at a faster rate.

 

 

...and? Heaven forbid the rest of the economy grow faster than the Government's ability to spend money. 


networkn
Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15474

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1992567 10-Apr-2018 10:16
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

6FIEND:

 

Short summary:
FACTS: The Health budget steadily increased year-on-year under the last National Government.  It increased (in inflation-adjusted terms) beyond what Labour funded it at a rate higher than the population growth that NZ experienced.
OPINIONS: It's not enough to do everything that we want to do. (from Healthcare advocates, lobbyists, and Unions.)

 

 

Okay, I give up. You win. Even if I could find more facts that would satisfy you, which I'm certain I could with some effort, I have no doubt you could find bigger and better ones to dispute them. In any case, I don't disagree with your conclusion. It will never be enough to do everything we want. So we have the answer. Now if I could only remember the question. Maybe I should ask Deep Thought.

 

 

 

 

Well done on your position change. I have respect for someone who feels strongly about a situation but is prepared to take proof into account and move from that position.

 

 


 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.
6FIEND
774 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 589
Inactive user


  #1992587 10-Apr-2018 10:19
Send private message

...and - I like accuracy.  That's all :-)

 

If you use false claims to make a good argument, you will lose when the falsehood is revealed.  (irrespective of whether your overall point was correct)

 

 

 

And @Rikkitic - that was opinion.  Facts are very rarely that amusing :-)


networkn
Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15474

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1992590 10-Apr-2018 10:24
Send private message

It doesn't matter how much JA says the spending at the start of their tenure wasn't the reason for the poor budget, the facts are that :

 

1) If you haven't been in power for a long time and don't have a complete grasp of the books you take a cautious approach to spending

 

1a) You don't over promise and under deliver as it makes you look vulnerable and not well structured to lead the country.

 

2) You don't spend money you aren't sure if you don't have it. 

 

The better approach would have been to look at the situation when you come in and THEN hand out lollies. 

 

Labour has once again, proven themselves unfit to lead. 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

  #1992600 10-Apr-2018 10:36
Send private message

The thing is, I think we all agree that health care is important, that it has been underfunded, and that it needs more money. The arguments always seem to come back to a tit for tat they did this or they didn't do that. I am very disappointed that Jacinda Ardern seems to be resorting to the old ploy of claiming to have inherited a bigger mess than expected from the previous government, so it is all somebody else's fault. This is just more of the same old same old, another politician behaving like a politician. I applauded the formation of this government because I was hoping for something new and fresh and different. I continue to do so. There is still time. 

 

 

 

  





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


networkn
Networkn
32873 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15474

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1992601 10-Apr-2018 10:39
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

The thing is, I think we all agree that health care is important, that it has been underfunded, and that it needs more money. The arguments always seem to come back to a tit for tat they did this or they didn't do that. I am very disappointed that Jacinda Ardern seems to be resorting to the old ploy of claiming to have inherited a bigger mess than expected from the previous government, so it is all somebody else's fault. This is just more of the same old same old, another politician behaving like a politician. I applauded the formation of this government because I was hoping for something new and fresh and different. I continue to do so. There is still time. 

 

 

 

  

 

 

My grandfather always taught me this: Start how you intend to continue. 

 

I am sorry to say, but you will be disappointed in this Government, they have shown what they are capable of. It would take some massive turnaround for them now. It would take some pretty amazing Leadership, and I have yet to see JA show ANY.

 

 


1 | ... | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | ... | 268
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.