Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Please note this sub-forum does not provide professional finance advice. You should seek advice from a licensed financial advisor.

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification.

If investing please consider our affiliate link for new accounts: Sharesies.



David321

507 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105


#315219 24-Jun-2024 07:29
Send private message

Hi all,

 


First of all, I do plan to check this with my conveyancer but I am also looking for other people opinions/experiences as I have seen information from lawyers and conveyencers also varies between them.

 

My wife and I have found a place in Rolleston we really like, we had been looking for a while and even had an offer on another place we like get declined as it was subject to sale of our house, so we have decided to get our house on the market and sell before making more offers on other places we like.

 

Our plan was to get our house sold unconditionally then start looking for a new place again and make offers without the subject to sale clause, which should make our offers more appealing to sellers. The deadline on our house sale is tomorrow and we already have an offer we are happy with, and possibly two more offers coming according to our agent. The potential buyer will obviously want 10 or 15 days to satisfy their finance and lim etc.

 

The house we like had a deadline 1 week after our deadline, so our house sale would not be unconditional by then and obviously there is a chance the buyer of our house may not be able to go unconditional if they dont get finance or something like that. This leaves us two choices for the house we like, we put our offer in with a subject to sale clause and explain that our house is conditionally sold anyway and hope that would be appealing enough to the sellers, or, as the selling agent has suggested, put an offer in without the subject to sale clause but use the subject to finance clause to fall back on if our buyer is unable to go unconditional as our pre-approval require an unconditional sale of our house.

 

I would never trust 100% what a selling agent tells me, but this is something I never thought of and there does seem to be some sense in it? I am just curious if there is any pitfalls/risks in relying on a subject to finance clause rather than a subject to sale clause in our situation? as mentioned already my pre-approval is based on an unconditional sale of my existing place anyway.





_David_

Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

cddt
1970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1905


  #3252302 24-Jun-2024 07:50
Send private message

First things first, speak to a lawyer you really, really trust. 

 

 

 

You can put in an offer subject to due diligence, and have your lawyer word it so it's as broad as possible. That will give you the 10 days you require. The clause can be wide enough to cover not only finance and building reports, but also suitability for your future use and any other criteria you may consider. 





My referral links: BigPipeMercury




Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3252419 24-Jun-2024 12:20
Send private message

Just ask a solicitor. That is why they exist. The cost of getting things like this wrong is potentially ruinous.






Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.